like your whole argument relies on the idea that to appeal to "capitalist" about how luxury goods will work
i'm telling you that is pretty f***ing nonsensical both theoretically and in practicality.
you can still have luxury goods and literally take care of the material needs of people
you can still have luxury goods and literally take care of the material needs of people
Why would the PS5 exist if not for the constant need for profit? PS4s already exist. Why would the PS5 exist if not for greed? We can all just make do with the PS4. Or the PS3.
The PS5 exists because of the constant need for profit from companies. The free market does lead to innovation in the consumer industry.
Most socialists are not trying to reach a state of communism. It does not naturally just progress. We're all using very broad terms here, anyway. A socialist can see the benefit in the free market. Some other socialists are less convinced.
I will give you that people use the label under many different interpretations with nuance but when we’re referring to the basic definition, socialism and communism will always be connected
obviously the transition between would require dismantling power structures that couldn’t all just stop at once, there’s so many facets of it that obviously it has varying ideas of how to address them
that’s why u see people in the middle because there are other issues that have to be focused on before it’s fully practical to reach a communist society
y’all need to stop skipping over the concept of socialism completely when you talk about communism because you're immediately leaving a huge gap in your understanding of what it is
I will give you that people use the label under many different interpretations with nuance but when we’re referring to the basic definition, socialism and communism will always be connected
obviously the transition between would require dismantling power structures that couldn’t all just stop at once, there’s so many facets of it that obviously it has varying ideas of how to address them
that’s why u see people in the middle because there are other issues that have to be focused on before it’s fully practical to reach a communist society
y’all need to stop skipping over the concept of socialism completely when you talk about communism because you're immediately leaving a huge gap in your understanding of what it is
There are people in the middle because they see the benefit in the free market. More regulation and the nationalisation of very core industries. This is a viable solution and one that will work. You scare people away when you start getting more militant. Start using your own common sense and look at the world around you right now. Marx ain't here to save us. You have to start using your own wisdom to understand the best route to equality. Communism is not it. Militant socialism is not it. It is not going to work.
Why would the PS5 exist if not for the constant need for profit? PS4s already exist. Why would the PS5 exist if not for greed? We can all just make do with the PS4. Or the PS3.
The PS5 exists because of the constant need for profit from companies. The free market does lead to innovation in the consumer industry.
Nope. It’s because people want a better console than the ps4 or ps3.
Nope. It’s because people want a better console than the ps4 or ps3.
The majority do not. They would make do with the PS4 and have the games continue to release on it instead of paying $500 for something new.
The PS5 does not exist because the consumer wants it. The PS5 exists because the companies can force the consumer to buy it.
So if I wanna be a rapper in a communist society and at a point in my life want to host a concert tour the magnitude of the Yeezus Tour how might I go about that if my city desperately needs people to build basic infrastructure like roads and water piping?
The majority do not. They would make do with the PS4 and have the games continue to release on it instead of paying $500 for something new.
The PS5 does not exist because the consumer wants it. The PS5 exists because the companies can force the consumer to buy it.
They want better, higher quality games, and that entails more powerful consoles who can run it.
They want better, higher quality games, and that entails more powerful consoles who can run it.
No they do not. The private companies want that so they can market their games better.
Within the consumer space in video games, history has shown us very consistently the most powerful console is almost never the most popular.
So if I wanna be a rapper in a communist society and at a point in my life want to host a concert tour the magnitude of the Yeezus Tour how might I go about that if my city desperately needs people to build basic infrastructure like roads and water piping?
who cares
So if I wanna be a rapper in a communist society and at a point in my life want to host a concert tour the magnitude of the Yeezus Tour how might I go about that if my city desperately needs people to build basic infrastructure like roads and water piping?
How many people and infrastructure is needed to manage a Yeezus type tour? I’m pretty sure you could get that without having to take away resources from roads and water piping
who cares
I do. I want to be a rapper. I want to have a concert tour the magnitude of the Yeezus Tour one day. If you do not care why do you even respond?
who cares
This is not an answer to his question. You don't care, we know that, but many people do. Figure it out.
You have to have a solution if you want support for your ideology.
How many people and infrastructure is needed to manage a Yeezus type tour? I’m pretty sure you could get that without having to take away resources from roads and water piping
No I’m saying how would I go about doing that? In a communist society?
Under capitalism you gather enough capital either through saving or outside investment.
Without capital, how do I get this done under communism?
This is not an answer to his question. You don't care, we know that, but many people do. Figure it out.
You have to have a solution if you want support for your ideology.
/thread
I suggest you stop gatekeeping socialism.
it’s the foundational theory behind it though.
No they do not. The private companies want that so they can market their games better.
Within the consumer space in video games, history has shown us very consistently the most powerful console is almost never the most popular.
Well if people don’t want that then they won’t get that and instead will get what they really want. What’s the issue with that?
it’s the foundational theory behind it though.
Definitions, political landscapes and ideologies change and adapt. The best definition is the one most viable in 2020.
Well if people don’t want that then they won’t get that and instead will get what they really want. What’s the issue with that?
How will they get it
Well if people don’t want that then they won’t get that and instead will get what they really want. What’s the issue with that?
Your argument is that the PS5 would just exist without the free market. It wouldn't.
No I’m saying how would I go about doing that? In a communist society?
Under capitalism you gather enough capital either through saving or outside investment.
Without capital, how do I get this done under communism?
You won’t need capital when you own the means of production.
this went from some guy asking about how communism works to some dumbass posting about the PS5