Reply
  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KimJongUn

    if you have nukes then you don't need to use them, its a defensive weapon

    So then just lie about having them

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Enpax

    Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world and has been on America’s nerves for decades. Still kicking it tho

    I think you could imagine that US aggression towards Venezuela would decrease significantly if they had nukes.

  • Jan 5, 2020

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    hot pancakes

    Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Lebanon's Iran-allied Hezbollah movement, said during a speech Sunday that only U.S. military assets, not U.S. civilians, should be targeted in retaliatory attacks for the killing of top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, according to the Washington Post.

    https://www.axios.com/hezbollah-leader-citizens-retribution-soleimani-fac58a08-e38f-4ab2-8126-6a37fac1e525.html

    I was just thinking this. if Iran or affiliates go for American citizens, it will cause us to want to fight

    Yeah, but honestly Iran and hezbollah are in general much more admirable than groups like al qaeda and isis. They genuinely act out of resistance towards imperialism rather than a belief in a worldwide autocracy

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    I think you could imagine that US aggression towards Venezuela would decrease significantly if they had nukes.

    I can imagine that yeah. But I can also imagine the US trying way harder to forment a coup in North Korea if the government wasn’t so on lock

  • Gojira 🦖
    Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Enpax

    Yeah, but honestly Iran and hezbollah are in general much more admirable than groups like al qaeda and isis. They genuinely act out of resistance towards imperialism rather than a belief in a worldwide autocracy

    They act out of resistance towards imperialism but that shouldn't be triumphed over the safety of their own people.

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    How many nukes would it take to realistically demolish the US?

  • Jan 5, 2020
    Versetti

    they have crippling sanctions on them that are starving venezuelans

    The sanctions against actual imports and exports didn’t start until the crisis was well under way. Before then only certain individuals were sanctioned, and even then Venezuela was (and is) free to trade with most other countries

  • Jan 5, 2020
    First Take

    So then just lie about having them

    actually having them is the better move

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Enpax

    I can imagine that yeah. But I can also imagine the US trying way harder to forment a coup in North Korea if the government wasn’t so on lock

    So you can see why countries would feel pressured to get nukes right?

    There would never have been a coup attempt in Venezuela if Maduro had his finger on the red button.

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    First Take

    How many nukes would it take to realistically demolish the US?

    Not many at all

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Enpax

    Not many at all

    We dropped 2 nuclear weapons on Japan, a way smaller country, and people were still living there immediately after

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    First Take

    How many nukes would it take to realistically demolish the US?

    nobody is nuking anybody

  • Jan 5, 2020
    KimJongUn

    nobody is nuking anybody

    I kno lol I’m just asking

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Based Persia

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    So you can see why countries would feel pressured to get nukes right?

    There would never have been a coup attempt in Venezuela if Maduro had his finger on the red button.

    Odds are if there were a coup attempt, Maduro wouldn’t try to use nuclear weapons to get himself out of it. I mean he may blame America but I’m not sure he’d be willing to throw the world away, knowing any nuclear strike wouldn’t be supported by most of his allies. I think what keeps North Korea out of reach besides the weapons is how strict the government maintains itself

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    yuuurp

    Based Persia

    https://twitter.com/iamgriff_/status/1213656302725062656

    this was last year

  • Jan 5, 2020
    Enpax

    Odds are if there were a coup attempt, Maduro wouldn’t try to use nuclear weapons to get himself out of it. I mean he may blame America but I’m not sure he’d be willing to throw the world away, knowing any nuclear strike wouldn’t be supported by most of his allies. I think what keeps North Korea out of reach besides the weapons is how strict the government maintains itself

    The strictness of its government certainly helps, but there has never been a US-backed coup in any country with nuclear capabilities

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    I never understood nukes tbh. Growing up they use to scare us telling us one is enough to make a place uninhabitable. But we dropped 2 and it’s still habitable. And they doing tours through Chernobyl now. Like I thought that place was gonna be crazy radioactive for thousands of years, they literally offer you dinner there. Idk

  • Jan 5, 2020
    First Take

    We dropped 2 nuclear weapons on Japan, a way smaller country, and people were still living there immediately after

    Nuclear weapons now are WAY more powerful now than in 1945. Even aside from ground zeros, the fallout in surrounding areas could cover very large portions of land making it uninhabitable, further destroying the ecosystem and inciting famine, further violence and such

  • Jan 5, 2020
    JohnnyFive

    this was last year

    What makes you think their attitude has changed? They've always hated the US and have had "death to America" as their slogan ever since the birth of the revolution.

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    First Take

    I never understood nukes tbh. Growing up they use to scare us telling us one is enough to make a place uninhabitable. But we dropped 2 and it’s still habitable. And they doing tours through Chernobyl now. Like I thought that place was gonna be crazy radioactive for thousands of years, they literally offer you dinner there. Idk

    Yeah but those are specific places that faced much lower scale weapons than we have now. If there were a nuclear assault in America, most people would immediately die, and those who didn’t will wish they did

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Enpax

    Yeah but those are specific places that faced much lower scale weapons than we have now. If there were a nuclear assault in America, most people would immediately die, and those who didn’t will wish they did

    Yeah our s*** now probably crazy. That Chernobyl s*** still odd though 🧐

  • Jan 5, 2020

    As terrible as nuclear weapons are, the truth is they’ve forced the major world leaders to act more responsibly than before. We might be at WW5 by now if otherwise

  • Jan 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    First Take

    Yeah our s*** now probably crazy. That Chernobyl s*** still odd though 🧐

    Yeah I’m not educated enough on that but I’m pretty sure the area was uninhabitable for a minute and the people on site suffered from numerous diseases as a result. But stuff like Chernobyl is now very unlikely to reoccur because people have learned to be much more careful when dealing with nuclear power