Reply
  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    If anything in the streaming era s*** is better than ever for smaller films

  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    This is complete cap lol. Just say you don't pay attention to anything other than franchise movies

    theguardian.com/film/2015/dec/17/quentin-tarantino-the-hateful-eight-disney-star-wars-cinema-booking

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    If anything in the streaming era s*** is better than ever for smaller films

    How do you figure that?

  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    RASIE

    How do you figure that?

    How not? You think anybody would go see the majority of the bullshit that gets popular on netflix in theaters? People just watch random s*** to have something to watch

  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    dadye

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/dec/17/quentin-tarantino-the-hateful-eight-disney-star-wars-cinema-booking

    Theaters are completely irrelevant as far as what smaller movies get traction lol. The theater industry is basically dead let it go

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    How not? You think anybody would go see the majority of the bullshit that gets popular on netflix in theaters? People just watch random s*** to have something to watch

    "Anything that gets popular on netflix"

    AKA, less than 2% of Netflix's original film productions each year

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    Theaters are completely irrelevant as far as what smaller movies get traction lol. The theater industry is basically dead let it go

    Thats....the point?

  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    RASIE

    Thats....the point?

    What point? How does less people packing theaters to go see mindless franchise s*** which leads to less showings of literally anything else hurt indie films?

  • Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    RASIE

    "Anything that gets popular on netflix"

    AKA, less than 2% of Netflix's original film productions each year

    It's still way easier to get exposure for a show or movie with no name actors on a streaming service than it would ever be to get people to see it in theaters. How could you even argue this?

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    It's still way easier to get exposure for a show or movie with no name actors on a streaming service than it would ever be to get people to see it in theaters. How could you even argue this?

    No, it's not. In 2019 Netflix released over 80 original films onto their service, sometimes multiple ones a week. 99% of them received virtually zero marketing, not even a spot on the platform's splash page or features in default categories that have prime real estate there.

    Of the streaming platforms with market control, Netflix and Hulu (and to a lesser degree Amazon) have spent the past 3 years significantly boosting the amount of original productions — both shows and film — as an effort to inflate their media libraries to offset losses from that increasingly crowded market.

    The idea that this environment is better — let alone "way easier to get exposure" — for smaller releases is entirely up to the platform's internal discretion, and they've consistently given ad campaigns to a tiny fraction of productions in general (smaller productions are frequently shuffled out with zero fanfare or manufactured hype).

    The only things the current streaming environment is better for are established and nascent names in the film industry, along with rights to franchise spinoff properties (or knock off media produced to capitalize on various trends).

    Yeah, it's easier for Netflix to give smaller productions exposure...if they want to, which they don't the vast majority of the time. Smaller movies themselves do not magically receive a golden ticket of publicity just because it's released by streaming platform.

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 14, 2020
    ·
    edited
    BANNED

    What point? How does less people packing theaters to go see mindless franchise s*** which leads to less showings of literally anything else hurt indie films?

    This is has been an ongoing issue in the film industry since the mid 90s. The whole "hurting indie/mid-range films" topic isn't new or explicitly current. It's been a problem for nearly 30 years — the problem has only become increasingly harder to ignore over the past decade of studio behavior and the gaming of distribution models at the box office. And now its been roped in alongside everything else due to the center-stage issue of cornovirus' effects on industry.

  • Jul 14, 2020
    RASIE

    No, it's not. In 2019 Netflix released over 80 original films onto their service, sometimes multiple ones a week. 99% of them received virtually zero marketing, not even a spot on the platform's splash page or features in default categories that have prime real estate there.

    Of the streaming platforms with market control, Netflix and Hulu (and to a lesser degree Amazon) have spent the past 3 years significantly boosting the amount of original productions — both shows and film — as an effort to inflate their media libraries to offset losses from that increasingly crowded market.

    The idea that this environment is better — let alone "way easier to get exposure" — for smaller releases is entirely up to the platform's internal discretion, and they've consistently given ad campaigns to a tiny fraction of productions in general (smaller productions are frequently shuffled out with zero fanfare or manufactured hype).

    The only things the current streaming environment is better for are established and nascent names in the film industry, along with rights to franchise spinoff properties (or knock off media produced to capitalize on various trends).

    Yeah, it's easier for Netflix to give smaller productions exposure...if they want to, which they don't the vast majority of the time. Smaller movies themselves do not magically receive a golden ticket of publicity just because it's released by streaming platform.

    I'm not texting you back paragraphs fam so you win but I still disagree

  • Jul 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Aruji

    The Lighthouse is only small when compared to big blockbusters and Oscar bait films tbh.

    it was popular among the arthouse crowd ofc but i consider a star to be someone that my mom or dad would recognize, which is most likely gonna happen when they see those 2 movies

  • RASIE 🎣
    Jul 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    decked

    it was popular among the arthouse crowd ofc but i consider a star to be someone that my mom or dad would recognize, which is most likely gonna happen when they see those 2 movies

    There's a difference between being a star and being a household name.

  • Jul 15, 2020
    RASIE

    There's a difference between being a star and being a household name.

    how do you define star then

  • 6isco 🦈
    Jul 15, 2020

    Love Don't Cost A Thing>>>>>>Drumline

  • Jul 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    BvS top 3 superhero movies of all time

  • Jul 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Probably not an unpopular opinion but; a majority of 00s teen movies aged like s***.

    I can remember watching this n thinking shorty had some moves

  • Jul 16, 2020
    Babaláwo

    Probably not an unpopular opinion but; a majority of 00s teen movies aged like s***.

    https://twitter.com/kingtrillax/status/1283573847401390080

    I can remember watching this n thinking shorty had some moves

    Man wtf is this

  • Jul 17, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    90% of the people who s*** on marvel movies watch nothing but bullshit anyway. It's just cool to be a contrarian against the biggest thing

    so because it's the biggest thing it means it is inherently good? or are do you think the contrarianism is contrived?

  • Jul 17, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    whiteboy magz

    so because it's the biggest thing it means it is inherently good? or are do you think the contrarianism is contrived?

    It's definitely just contrarianism. They'll watch any other mindless franchise bullshit (some are dc warner bros stans) but have a problem when it's movies that are both critically praised and highly popular

    Also what's the difference between marvel movies and the big mindless action movies of the 80's? (Indiana Jones, Jaws). They're written well from a character perspective but not complicated or challenging in any way

  • Jul 17, 2020
    ·
    edited
    BANNED

    It's definitely just contrarianism. They'll watch any other mindless franchise bullshit (some are dc warner bros stans) but have a problem when it's movies that are both critically praised and highly popular

    Also what's the difference between marvel movies and the big mindless action movies of the 80's? (Indiana Jones, Jaws). They're written well from a character perspective but not complicated or challenging in any way

    i see what you mean, that's a fair point. the hypocrisy regarding the treatment of blockbusters

  • Jul 17, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    BANNED

    It's definitely just contrarianism. They'll watch any other mindless franchise bullshit (some are dc warner bros stans) but have a problem when it's movies that are both critically praised and highly popular

    Also what's the difference between marvel movies and the big mindless action movies of the 80's? (Indiana Jones, Jaws). They're written well from a character perspective but not complicated or challenging in any way

    Boi, don't throw Jaws in there as mindless action and compare it to Marvel.

  • Jul 17, 2020
    JaeRell

    Boi, don't throw Jaws in there as mindless action and compare it to Marvel.

    Should've probably said a new hope instead but I'm basically just saying it's a good story but doesn't really have much deeper complexity to it. Which I'm completely fine with