Why are there people on here saying 88/100 is a bad score and it’s a flop?
They a sony pony and got no games to play
Similar to a young child in the neighborhood on Christmas, what would they typically do? They gaze out the window at other kids who received impressive toys, attempting to reassure themselves that their own toys are still worthwhile.
I'm personally not here for the d***eatin either tho, game looks good but not great as it should be
whataboutism is like a cheap diversion, a way of avoiding the point. Where as Kroniic is establishing a weird double standard that exists between two platforms
Its not a double standard because Insominac rarely makes 90+ meta games. You would see the same energy if a mainline 3D Mario or Zelda game scored in the high 80s, or if a God of War or Last of Us game did the same though...God of War Ascension got an 80 and the had to go revamp the entire series
https://www.eurogamer.net/starfield-launches-as-a-polished-consistent-experience-on-xbox-series-x-and-series-s
Starfield launches as a polished, consistent experience on Xbox Series X and Series S
Armand White review all that matters
This guys game runs so smooth
https://www.eurogamer.net/starfield-launches-as-a-polished-consistent-experience-on-xbox-series-x-and-series-s
Starfield launches as a polished, consistent experience on Xbox Series X and Series S
'Hey how's Starfield?'
'It's a polished, consistent experience on Xbox Series X and Series S
'
Well, yeah. There’s more pedigree, more money, more resources, greater ambition (that they themselves established to hype their title up).
exactly that’s why I posted that it’s a bit silly that 88 for sea of stars caused you to make a thread about how it was a banger but then you’re in here being immediately critical of starfield at the same score when you know that it’s a lot harder for them to get that 88. I just don’t get why there’s not the same excitement.
imagine caring this much about reviews, go touch grass you nerds
These npc fits
Nothing can prepare us for the GTA VI review day, can’t wait
Anything lower than 100 is a flop for that game I'm afraid
Is it too late to call that Latina back and tell her your evening has opened back up….
i been crying at this post, you dumb as hell for this one
Fallout as directed by Todd Howard's Bethesda game studios starting with fallout 3 (2008) followed by fallout 4 (2015) are awful
Fallout 3 is great
I was in the trenches defending tlou2 I will be in the trenches here depending if I like the game or not
exactly that’s why I posted that it’s a bit silly that 88 for sea of stars caused you to make a thread about how it was a banger but then you’re in here being immediately critical of starfield at the same score when you know that it’s a lot harder for them to get that 88. I just don’t get why there’s not the same excitement.
Because Sea of Stars doesn’t have the f***ing eyeballs of a STARFIELD. That’s why I made that thread. That game didn’t even HAVE a thread.