yea but i mean like
promoting a strict moral policy prevents the capture of organizers/ activists
its every org thats ambivalent on this stuff that always has feds/pests
Also I highly doubt more moralistic scolding would have saved a lot of these orgs, especially considering how routinely a lot of these people do the most egregious stuff (the male feminist committing sexual crimes trope comes to mind)
It's easy enough to split people apart via mere issues and talking points and insisting on endless bureaucratic minutiae, the police doesn't even need to get to blackmail a lot of times, that's more morons being morons without any fed pressure
• Value can mean the “use value”. It is how useful the good is a to a human being. This is rather subjective and difficult, if not impossible to quantify.
• Value can mean the “exchange value”. It is the rate at which the good can be exchanged for another good.
• A commodity is a good that is, or in the future will be, exchanged. It has both a use value (otherwise nobody will want to exchange for it, since it would be useless), and an exchange value.
• There are goods that have no exchange value: For example, if a mother bakes a cake for her children from dough, the cake itself is not baked for the purpose of exchanging it for another commodity. The cake is purely made for consumption within the family. Therefore, the cake has no exchange value, but it does have a use value. The cake is not a commodity in this case.
• All commodities are goods, but not all goods are commodities, since not all goods are made for the intent of exchange. In a hunter-gatherer society where no trade exists, no commodities would exist – everything is made for personal consumption. However, in capitalism, most things are made not for immediate personal consumption, but for trade. Under capitalism, most goods indeed are commodities, since most goods are produced for the intent of exchanging it on a market. Capitalism is the mode of production where commodity production has reached its thus-far historical peak.
• While the distinction between “use value” and “exchange value” is important to understand which goods are commodities and which goods are not, this distinction should not be overemphasized: When we speak of capitalism, we must speak of commodities first and foremost, since these are the most common forms of goods. When we speak of value in capitalism, we are therefore speaking of the value of commodities. But: It would be wrong to split up the “value” of a commodity into exchange-value and use-value. The value of commodities is always both. If it has no use-value, it cannot be a commodity. If it has no exchange-value, it cannot be a commodity. The value of commodities is a unitary concept, not a dualistic one. The value of commodities is always both use-value and exchange-value combined.
• “Value” under capitalism expresses the relation between the commodity as a “thing” on the one hand and between human beings on the other. If all humans died from one day to the other, how could a Ferrari have any value? If all humans disappeared from one day to the next, all former commodities of the world would now just be mere objects, without any value whatsoever. For commodities to have any value, humans must exist. For value to have any meaning, goods and commodities must exist. Value is part of both the exterior world of objects and in the interior world of minds, both in the world of objects and in the world of humans, always these two sides at once: Value is a unitary concept.
• Value is what expresses the connection between humans and objects – the exchange-value being the social connection, the use value being the private connection we humans have towards these things, or, in the case of capitalism, towards these commodities.
• The exchange-value determines how the commodity-as-an-object forms a social relationship amongst individuals; the use-value determines the relationship between the subjectivity of the inside world of human desires and the physicality of the outside world of objects.
• Value is neither based purely on the extrinsic nature of a commodity (such as: the amount of other commodities you can exchange your commodity for), nor is it based purely on the intrinsic nature of a commodity (such as: how much energy or time it took to produce this commodity). Value has both an extrinsic and an intrinsic moment. The value of commodities is of course a social relation (since a commodity must by definition exist for the intent of trade), but it also has a natural component to it (the energy, the time needed on average and so on).
• Value is how society considers the material commodity. However, society and commodity are always bound by the laws of nature, such as the laws of energy, physics, chemistry, geology or the laws of time, aging and mortality. Therefore, just as much as society shapes its relation to the commodity, the commodity’s outside circumstances shape their relation to society as well.
• Therefore, in capitalism, a material product of concrete human labor acquires social character through value. Value is then the objective social process that gives the material product of concrete human labor the dimension of sociality, transforming it from a mere object to a commodity.
• Value can therefore be described as a social algorithm.
Ok just finished reading this post
good stuff
Had one question though- Where is the distinction between use value and exchange value most emphasized?
Like what writings/works ? Kapital?
I feel like in my reading I only scratched the surface of the values of goods and commodities
Im ready to crash and burn my reputation here over b\*\*\*\* and retärd :letsfuckinggo: Split the thread :letsfuckinggo: Splinter movement after page 1000 :letsfuckinggo: Only fellas who use the r-word allowed in the new thread :letsfuckinggo:
Nah Im joking
Dont mind me
Just having some laffs
Hope ur doing alright man
Feel like things are getting worse and every day I'm realizing I have to climb out of this s*** and develop more strength but i haven't activated the willpower
Well I aint a s***pest nor a misogynist so...
Not a S***pest? Sure I'll give you that one
Not a misogynist? Your language when speaking about women doesn't bode well for that defense
But, once again thats all u.
I already feel like I made my opinions known dozens of pages ago
Hope ur doing alright man
Feel like things are getting worse and every day I'm realizing I have to climb out of this s*** and develop more strength but i haven't activated the willpower
Im doing aight tbh
Only person I talk to here more often is @Scratchin_Bandit
He knows I throw off some posts and then keep things pushing
KTT kind of like my punching bag
Sometimes I do be testing the boundaries word to Kanye
Not a S***pest? Sure I'll give you that one
Not a misogynist? Your language when speaking about women doesn't bode well for that defense
But, once again thats all u.
I already feel like I made my opinions known dozens of pages ago
I dont think Im one and women in my life seem to agree
Also I highly doubt more moralistic scolding would have saved a lot of these orgs, especially considering how routinely a lot of these people do the most egregious stuff (the male feminist committing sexual crimes trope comes to mind)
It's easy enough to split people apart via mere issues and talking points and insisting on endless bureaucratic minutiae, the police doesn't even need to get to blackmail a lot of times, that's more morons being morons without any fed pressure
Yeah I do think there is something to a man trying too hard to be "feminist" when it's like, how about you start with your thoughts and actions and be kind and compassionate and recognize everyone should get a fair shot and look at double standards and s***
There is still an issue of virtue signaling instead of actually being about s***, but it doesn't mean that the actual "virtue" itself is bad
It's more that its like look at me but you don't live this s*** in your actions
That's the contradiction
I dont think Im one and women in my life seem to agree
That's good.
All we on this site can judge from is the words u use,
Thats all we know of u unless other info was stated, if that makes sense
I can relate to blowing off hella steam on here though I be posting the dumbest s*** and even just braindead rambling even when i should've left the site hours before
But its like those words are coming from somewhere, the question is where and why
That's good.
All we on this site can judge from is the words u use,
Thats all we know of u unless other info was stated, if that makes sense
I can relate to blowing off hella steam on here though I be posting the dumbest s*** and even just braindead rambling even when i should've left the site hours before
By now people should realize I use stark language humoristically, and that I won't change that
By now people should realize I use stark language humoristically, and that I won't change that
S*** wasn't hitting apparently lmao
They had u like

But its like those words are coming from somewhere, the question is where and why
It's funny bc it's abnormal
If it were normal it wouldn't be funny
I'm really not that careful with words as you guys are, especially online
Goblin b**** alone is so over the top that it makes me laff
S*** wasn't hitting apparently lmao
They had u like

It had me laffin and thats what counts for me
It's funny bc it's abnormal
If it were normal it wouldn't be funny
I'm really not that careful with words as you guys are, especially online
Goblin b**** alone is so over the top that it makes me laff
Socialism not just a boys club tho
even though this site feels like it in most of its places
It had me laffin and thats what counts for me
S*** i feel u sometimes making ourselves laugh is all we got in a given moment
I just found out what happened to Frankito this past week
https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/1578972736957059072Tbh seems like someone asked him to tweet this and he agreed, all his other tweets are written so differently
Socialism not just a boys club tho
even though this site feels like it in most of its places
Girls can laff at it too, i told one of my female friends about it and she started laffing too
Also I highly doubt more moralistic scolding would have saved a lot of these orgs, especially considering how routinely a lot of these people do the most egregious stuff (the male feminist committing sexual crimes trope comes to mind)
It's easy enough to split people apart via mere issues and talking points and insisting on endless bureaucratic minutiae, the police doesn't even need to get to blackmail a lot of times, that's more morons being morons without any fed pressure
yea that stuff is exactly why the policy is strict
its not scolding, its being kicked out and exempted from organizing with the org.
yea that stuff is exactly why the policy is strict
its not scolding, its being kicked out and exempted from organizing with the org.
And yet despite the american left being so hard on morals these things keep happening, why? Do they not scold enough? Is the group too undisciplined?
I dont noticr such issues in Germany
I just found out what happened to Frankito this past week
https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/1578972736957059072reverse fargo be like: time to drop everything and go join the iranian revolt
And yet despite the american left being so hard on morals these things keep happening, why? Do they not scold enough? Is the group too undisciplined?
I dont noticr such issues in Germany
it has nothing to do with scolding its just what is acceptable conduct as an organizer.
and like you said all the orgs that let these things happen are becuz they dont maintain discipline in treating these things seriously.
it has nothing to do with scolding its just what is acceptable conduct as an organizer.
and like you said all the orgs that let these things happen are becuz they dont maintain discipline in treating these things seriously.
Bro these things happen in the DSA
I dont think it is productive or else you would have had ironclad orgs for years now, this wave is like 15 years old at this point
I really don't think a lot of it works and i think it is just the same expression of american puritanism that they have elsewhere in society but somehow repurposed now to be leftist