@krishna_bound If you have questions about Maoism, I can help. I'm like the resident KTT Maoist
A much-coveted title galaxy wide
While I'm not a fan of Mao Zedong himself, I do think the ideological synthesis known as Maoism is quite interesting. He took influence from anarchism as it was the dominant radical leftist ideological strain in Asia predating Marxism in the early 1900s. His focus on the lumpenproletariat and the "mass line" program were cues taken. I do believe Mao's various plans and Great Leap Forward failed because he didn't get rid of the state capitalist social relations, thus they could never make the leap to socialism and he ended up crippling his country, and China's early reliance on Soviet aid in their economic planning kinda played a part in this. I also don't like the way he would purposely rile up the people for a new revolution but then he fired back against them when they got too rowdy, or dissented in ways he didn't like.
While I'm not a fan of Mao Zedong himself, I do think the ideological synthesis known as Maoism is quite interesting. He took influence from anarchism as it was the dominant radical leftist ideological strain in Asia predating Marxism in the early 1900s. His focus on the lumpenproletariat and the "mass line" program were cues taken. I do believe Mao's various plans and Great Leap Forward failed because he didn't get rid of the state capitalist social relations, thus they could never make the leap to socialism and he ended up crippling his country, and China's early reliance on Soviet aid in their economic planning kinda played a part in this. I also don't like the way he would purposely rile up the people for a new revolution but then he fired back against them when they got too rowdy, or dissented in ways he didn't like.
I do believe he got to socialism after new democracy. I got a question thought how would he have gotten rid feudal relations without capitalism in this case the period of New Democracy, the whole point of it is to get rid of the feudal relations by intensifying capitalist relations then after the feudal relations are gone you can start construction of socialism. I feel like this would apply to all semi-feudal nations and as well maybe to indigenous groups as well.
Also yeah the reliance on soviet aid was one of the reasons the GLF ended up being the way it is, the criticism of Khrushchev leading to the Soviet Union pulling out aid unless Mao kept his mouth shut.
Always heard that Mao was an anarchist when he was younger as well never really seen any proof for it though.
I do believe he got to socialism after new democracy. I got a question thought how would he have gotten rid feudal relations without capitalism in this case the period of New Democracy, the whole point of it is to get rid of the feudal relations by intensifying capitalist relations then after the feudal relations are gone you can start construction of socialism. I feel like this would apply to all semi-feudal nations and as well maybe to indigenous groups as well.
Also yeah the reliance on soviet aid was one of the reasons the GLF ended up being the way it is, the criticism of Khrushchev leading to the Soviet Union pulling out aid unless Mao kept his mouth shut.
Always heard that Mao was an anarchist when he was younger as well never really seen any proof for it though.
Afghanistan is the proof of trying to solve the contradictions of capitalism in a feudal society
Afghanistan is the proof of trying to solve the contradictions of capitalism in a feudal society
what do u mean by that ?
cause in my post the New Democracy period in China is what did that, it got rid of the feudal relations.
Idk much about the Taliban to comment on what they wanna do or whether if i think it would work or not
what do u mean by that ?
cause in my post the New Democracy period in China is what did that, it got rid of the feudal relations.
Idk much about the Taliban to comment on what they wanna do or whether if i think it would work or not
I’m talking about how the Afghan communists didn’t come close to achieving it
Yeah I dont see it any other way either I guess I can hear the argument that a reborn maoist china can help aid groups like the Naxals and Philippines eventually but revolutions are a brutal and long process, the October revolution took 6 but I dont think we can see another revolution like that again , how long did the Chinese take 10 years? and thats not including the time to rebuild afterwards.
@Cudderwalks also im interested on ur opinion with a Maoist revolution within China and how much would it strengthen US Imperialism that would it be worth it ?
Also this at end of the day is just hypothesising about events that prob have very close to 0% of happening since the modern CCP is massively supported by their population
I’m not so sure a Maoist China would weaken or strengthen US Imperialism. It would likely remain the same as China even when it was much less industrialized after the civil war was a major rival to the US. A Maoist China has already held the United States at bay in the past during the Vietnam and Korean wars. As the US feared intervention from China. It would change a lot of things as China would likely no longer have interests in Africa and South America but would assert itself into things in India and the Philippines to support those revolutions.
Although I wouldn’t be so sure a Maoist revolution in China is impossible. There’s been several instances of graffiti in China praising Chairman Gonzalo and Mao outside of factories. Plus there’s been alot of reports in a surge of interest in Mao by Chinese youth.
I'd say most of questions don't come from the ideology itself but lack of understanding of prevalence of opinions or correct usages of certain terminologies (which to me seem to have other definition often) without coming from said background. This is virtually the only website or general place I interact with people who come from leftist backgrounds on, so I don't really know most leftist sensibilities or like mutual social cues, which makes discussion on my end difficult at times since it feels like I can be speaking a different language even if I've read the same materials.
This is kinda a general rundown, if you have questions about terms I can explain
Maoism (to Maoists) is a new stage of Marxism. It was developed by the Communist Party of Peru in the 70s/80s. It's been adopted across the world and today revolutions ongoing in Peru, Philippines, India and Turkey follow Maoism. There is mistakes that were in ML which Mao, and other Maoist revolutionaries explained and corrected.
A Few Things Maoism Introduces
Two Line Struggle
Protracted Peoples War
Mass Line
Placing importance on Crit/Self Crit
New Democracy
Theory of Contradictions
Theory of Knowledge
Maoists reject any type of electoralism in a capitalist nation, even if the candidates fall under a red banner. A famous slogan from Maoist orgs is "Don't Vote, Fight for Revolution." Most but not all Maoists also adhere to Gonzalo thought, those that do are called Principled Maoists
In the US there is several nationwide Maoist Orgs
All these orgs with the exception of FTP work together
Tribune of the People
United Neighborhood Defense Movement
For the People
Serve the People
Defend Our Hoodz
Red Aid
Popular Women's Movement
Committee to Reconstitute the Communist Party of the US
There's a lot of smaller local ones but those are the national ones I can think of
This is kinda a general rundown, if you have questions about terms I can explain
Maoism (to Maoists) is a new stage of Marxism. It was developed by the Communist Party of Peru in the 70s/80s. It's been adopted across the world and today revolutions ongoing in Peru, Philippines, India and Turkey follow Maoism. There is mistakes that were in ML which Mao, and other Maoist revolutionaries explained and corrected.
A Few Things Maoism Introduces
Two Line Struggle
Protracted Peoples War
Mass Line
Placing importance on Crit/Self Crit
New Democracy
Theory of Contradictions
Theory of Knowledge
Maoists reject any type of electoralism in a capitalist nation, even if the candidates fall under a red banner. A famous slogan from Maoist orgs is "Don't Vote, Fight for Revolution." Most but not all Maoists also adhere to Gonzalo thought, those that do are called Principled Maoists
In the US there is several nationwide Maoist Orgs
All these orgs with the exception of FTP work together
Tribune of the People
United Neighborhood Defense Movement
For the People
Serve the People
Defend Our Hoodz
Red Aid
Popular Women's Movement
Committee to Reconstitute the Communist Party of the US
There's a lot of smaller local ones but those are the national ones I can think of
And then you got the Red Guards Austin



these fools rly attacked some old guy and trashed a DSA meeting in Kansas City
reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/eo9f9a/red_guards_austin_rga_have_assaulted_austin
what the f*** does this do to advance any type of agenda
And then you got the Red Guards Austin
Red Guards have been closed for over three years
that s*** has to be a fed op
They weren’t feds, one of their leaders was arrested and might still be in jail. They also had an FBI investigation being done into them.
One main goals of the Red Guards Austin, Red Guards LA, Charlotte, KC etc was to be aggressively anti revisionist. They closed because they realized that they needed to change strategies and do something else because what they were doing wasnt helping anything.
Most of the time when the got violent it was for a decent reason, they just never conveyed why and it made them look crazy.
One example is the PSL situation with the video you attached. The reason they confronted the PSL members was because they were harboring a known rapist within their chapter. Just a few months later that PSL chapter was shutdown by the national PSL branch.
So they were in the right to not allow a rapist to be organizing in their city, but they didn’t go about it in a way in which people would know that and be on their side.

Next level LARP
yeah the Red Guard Austin overt focus revisionism on stuff like the Bolivarian Revolution that has very little connection to America working class was always my biggest gripe with them. The minimum they could have done was to relate it back to America rather than just saying f*** Venezuela they're revisionist and leave it at that, the audience should be the working class relate why Venezuela is revisionist back to them and why it would be a bad thing, the audience shouldn't be other weird ass commie nerds.
@Cudderwalks look what came in a few days ago

@Cudderwalks look what came in a few days ago

That’s hard as f***, did you print tht yourself?
That’s hard as f***, did you print tht yourself?
nah got it off pggtpublishers.wordpress.com some small Canadian publishing house kinda like fourth sword in America
nah got it off https://pggtpublishers.wordpress.com some small Canadian publishing house kinda like fourth sword in America
I’ll check them out, I have a few books from fourth sword but don’t like how all their stuff has the same cover.

Much agreed comrade, the growing Rank and Flie Committee movement, despite increasingly desperate denial from the pseudo-left Pabloite revisionist renegades, is striking fear into the hearts of the global imperialist monopoly bourgeoisie. Global capitalism, now more than 80 years into its terminal death agony, can only be transcended through the fulfillment of the objective historical revolutionary role of the class conscious proletariat. The emancipation of the proletariat must be the act of the proletariat itself - under the sole leadership, of course, of the one true world party of socialist revolution, the International Committee of the Fourth International. In their steadfast struggle against all forms of pseudo-left vulgarizations of revolutionary Marxism, David North and the SEP have won the Rank and File proletariat to a genuine Marxist program. The contradictions of global imperialism threaten a Third World War fought with nuclear weapons, and therefore the fate of not just the working class, but the human species itself, depends on resolutely exposing the Pabloites, Grantites, Cliffites, Healyites, Hansenites, Wohlforthites, Mandelites, Steinerites, and all other forms of counter-revolutionary opportunism blocking the path to left unity and planetary proletarian revolution. We urge all workers, youth, and intellectuals stirred by this call to action to unite in Rank and File Committees and to contact the International Committee today.
I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.
“Bad news, detective. We got a situation.”
“What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?”
“Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.”
The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. “What kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?”
“Not yet. But mark my words: we’re going to figure out who did this and we’re going to take them down … provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.”
“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”
He laughed. “That’s why you’re the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.”
“Don’t worry,” I said. “I’m on it.”
I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.
“Home Depot™ Presents the Police!®” I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. “Nobody move unless you want to!” They didn’t.
“Now, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?” No one spoke up.
“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”
It didn’t seem like they did.
“Seriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, I’m just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.”
Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didn’t care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy d**** was missing.
I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.
“Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®” I yelled.
Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.
“Stop right there!” I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.
I was losing him. “Listen, I’ll pay you to stop!” I yelled. “What would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? I’ll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn ‘Bob Barr ‘08’ extra-large long-sleeved men’s T-shirt!”
He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.
“All right, all right!” the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. “I give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.”
“Why’d you do it?” I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos™ Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs® on the guy.
“Because I was afraid.”
“Afraid?”
“Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,” he said. “I’m a central banker.”
I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.
“Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,” I said. “No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you’ll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.”
He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me for arresting him.