ah ai I get ya just interested what would u consider to be the full roots of marxism, since revisionism especially with Maoism is a huge thing so would these synthesis ideology be consider revisionist or something else?
Just to be honest and reiterate this, I’m not an expert in applying general definitions like revisionist accurately since my background isn’t really in leftist circles, it makes conversations somewhat challenging when I only know the underlying authors and ideas/concepts but my understanding of terms or applications is distinct from mutually agreed understandings in more close knit or overlapping circles
I think he recognizes that Marx is useful for as what is described in the article as “hardware” (economics, systems, institutions) while China needs to develop and instil its own "software" (culture, values, attitudes) that offers an alternative to "western liberal individualism".
Wangs influence is pretty widely reported and described all over in the same way the article did so I believe it.
As per the current party line towards Mao I believe most of their criticism is directed at specifically the cultural revolution while stuff like the land reforms are praised. Could be wrong here tho...
This is basically my understanding as well from having read some of his work, which is basically not distinct from thinkers like Aflaq and their views of Marx. Also to reiterate I didn't mean to imply there was literal anti-Mao sentiment, just that the emerging philosophical ideologies are increasingly distant from their roots.
This is basically my understanding as well from having read some of his work, which is basically not distinct from thinkers like Aflaq and their views of Marx. Also to reiterate I didn't mean to imply there was literal anti-Mao sentiment, just that the emerging philosophical ideologies are increasingly distant from their roots.
Wish the book he wrote about America in the 80s had an english translation I'd be all over that
Wish the book he wrote about America in the 80s had an english translation I'd be all over that
You can find partial english translations of parts of it (and lots of other stuff he's written) in other academic papers which cite him or are meant to (essentially) be CCP outreach to westerners (such as those Insight Academic Papers if youve seen those). Unfortunately I was still in college when I was accessing these taking advantage of college credential access to academic databases, let me see if i can find them on like JSTOR or something.
You can find partial english translations of parts of it (and lots of other stuff he's written) in other academic papers which cite him or are meant to (essentially) be CCP outreach to westerners (such as those Insight Academic Papers if youve seen those). Unfortunately I was still in college when I was accessing these taking advantage of college credential access to academic databases, let me see if i can find them on like JSTOR or something.
Dope, this guy has an amateur translation with deepL which is pretty good but it would be a cool thing to have a hard copy of
Dope, this guy has an amateur translation with deepL which is pretty good but it would be a cool thing to have a hard copy of
https://twitter.com/JaakWaller/status/1353100985325903872?s=20
oh s*** I think i remember this, if you know Angela Nagle she actually linked to this awhile ago while she was in the midst of going through her "leftist -> vague right winger claiming to be leftist" phase.
angelanagle.substack.com/p/america-against-america
i think i'm confusing where i read what work from, this is definitely where i saw this, the stuff I was reading which was translate/cited must have been A***ysis of Contemporary Western Politics or National Sovereignty instead
ah ai I get ya just interested what would u consider to be the full roots of marxism, since revisionism especially with Maoism is a huge thing so would these synthesis ideology be consider revisionist or something else?
okay actually i was partially off in remembering here, i actually managed to find some of his work once more and he literally rips apart Maoism and the Cultural Revolution and criticizes China from weirdly liberal standpoints like not being democratic enough, the one party system, etc.
just some notes though, he did issue some revisions over time apparently, and this was also written before America vs America so perhaps he's changed somewhat over time.
Although with that said yeah I wasn't misremembering the HM thing, you can look at the linked America vs America translated document in the above thread where he also straight up says in all ways except literally that he doesn't believe in HM lol
okay actually i was partially off in remembering here, i actually managed to find some of his work once more and he literally rips apart Maoism and the Cultural Revolution and criticizes China from weirdly liberal standpoints like not being democratic enough, the one party system, etc.
https://www.readingthechinadream.com/wang-huning-the-culture-revolution-and-reform-of-chinas-political-system.html
just some notes though, he did issue some revisions over time apparently, and this was also written before America vs America so perhaps he's changed somewhat over time.
Although with that said yeah I wasn't misremembering the HM thing, you can look at the linked America vs America translated document in the above thread where he also straight up says in all ways except literally that he doesn't believe in HM lol
what do u mean by HM ? and yeah im reading the Angela thing rn lol
NVM I got it historical materialism
what do u mean by HM ? and yeah im reading the Angela thing rn lol
NVM I got it historical materialism
historical materialism sorry
historical materialism sorry
I just got it right after writing that no worries
okay actually i was partially off in remembering here, i actually managed to find some of his work once more and he literally rips apart Maoism and the Cultural Revolution and criticizes China from weirdly liberal standpoints like not being democratic enough, the one party system, etc.
https://www.readingthechinadream.com/wang-huning-the-culture-revolution-and-reform-of-chinas-political-system.html
just some notes though, he did issue some revisions over time apparently, and this was also written before America vs America so perhaps he's changed somewhat over time.
Although with that said yeah I wasn't misremembering the HM thing, you can look at the linked America vs America translated document in the above thread where he also straight up says in all ways except literally that he doesn't believe in HM lol
im actually dying reading this this is way way worse than i remember, this could have come from the DSA wtf
okay actually i was partially off in remembering here, i actually managed to find some of his work once more and he literally rips apart Maoism and the Cultural Revolution and criticizes China from weirdly liberal standpoints like not being democratic enough, the one party system, etc.
https://www.readingthechinadream.com/wang-huning-the-culture-revolution-and-reform-of-chinas-political-system.html
just some notes though, he did issue some revisions over time apparently, and this was also written before America vs America so perhaps he's changed somewhat over time.
Although with that said yeah I wasn't misremembering the HM thing, you can look at the linked America vs America translated document in the above thread where he also straight up says in all ways except literally that he doesn't believe in HM lol
god damn he hates the cultural revolution, would always be interested to see if any new socialist state arrive that tend to be pro cultural revolution how they would interact with modern china or at end of the day realpolitiks would win again
god damn he hates the cultural revolution, would always be interested to see if any new socialist state arrive that tend to be pro cultural revolution how they would interact with modern china or at end of the day realpolitiks would win again
yeah this is what i was referring to in the rejections of Maoism in the long post i made, but i have to say, it's way more critical than i remember it being. I think it's also interesting his considers things like the Anti-Rightist Struggle a tragedy - in my experience people who like Mao who reject the CR still tend to embrace that one, so that's something. His thoughts on rejection of virtually everything post-Lenin combined with the anti-HM stuff in America vs America is kinda what I was referring to in my posts about him, albeit to tbh reading it fresh once more its way worse than i remember it being lmao. although like i said, it's just a slight feeling that he may hate the CR because his father initially fought for Chiang Kai-Shek and his upbringing was based in access to foreign literature which he shouldn't have had access to because of it.
What countries which are pro-CR could develop socialist states? I feel like it's hard to imagine something like the CR taking place in the modern era. Or do you just mean like theoretically
okay actually i was partially off in remembering here, i actually managed to find some of his work once more and he literally rips apart Maoism and the Cultural Revolution and criticizes China from weirdly liberal standpoints like not being democratic enough, the one party system, etc.
https://www.readingthechinadream.com/wang-huning-the-culture-revolution-and-reform-of-chinas-political-system.html
just some notes though, he did issue some revisions over time apparently, and this was also written before America vs America so perhaps he's changed somewhat over time.
Although with that said yeah I wasn't misremembering the HM thing, you can look at the linked America vs America translated document in the above thread where he also straight up says in all ways except literally that he doesn't believe in HM lol
Yeah this is interesting I'm not sure if something is being lost in translation or his opinions changed so drastically after his visit to america lol
Yeah this is interesting I'm not sure if something is being lost in translation or his opinions changed so drastically after his visit to america lol
the edit/follow-up from 2012 (which i definitely hadnt prior read) actually seems to double down on it further. i have no idea if this is just a case of poor translation or what.
god damn he hates the cultural revolution, would always be interested to see if any new socialist state arrive that tend to be pro cultural revolution how they would interact with modern china or at end of the day realpolitiks would win again
Don't think anyone in the current CCP likes the cultural revolution
yeah this is what i was referring to in the rejections of Maoism in the long post i made, but i have to say, it's way more critical than i remember it being. I think it's also interesting his considers things like the Anti-Rightist Struggle a tragedy - in my experience people who like Mao who reject the CR still tend to embrace that one, so that's something. His thoughts on rejection of virtually everything post-Lenin combined with the anti-HM stuff in America vs America is kinda what I was referring to in my posts about him, albeit to tbh reading it fresh once more its way worse than i remember it being lmao. although like i said, it's just a slight feeling that he may hate the CR because his father initially fought for Chiang Kai-Shek and his upbringing was based in access to foreign literature which he shouldn't have had access to because of it.
What countries which are pro-CR could develop socialist states? I feel like it's hard to imagine something like the CR taking place in the modern era. Or do you just mean like theoretically
I was mainly talking theoretically I dont think any AES upholds the Cultural Revolution, its mainly just maoist groups out there, if the PCP in Peru didnt massively f*** up maybe there, they got the closest to winning a protracted peoples war not including China of course. The other groups just have been stuck in strategic defence for what like 50 years now for both India and Philippines, its getting a little disheartening.
In Theory terms the cultural revolution is the last line of defence against a rising red capitalist class within the party, if the two line struggle against revisionism doesn't end up working, then its cultural revolution time baby lol. I guess a more concrete way of looking at it is that socialist projects will have twist and turns like how France had the monarchist reversals and the republicans reversing the reversal and such.
The interesting geopolitical part of this within communist movements is that since maoist see China currently as a capitalist nation using socialism essentially as an aesthetic, they would support another Maoist revolution would them but if he revolution that occur how much would it weaken China currently and how much stronger would it make US imperialism, I usually go on the side idk man.
How would it look in actuality I have no idea or if it would even be possible, other than vague slogans of bombard the headquarters
Don't think anyone in the current CCP likes the cultural revolution
yeah would make sense, since the enemies of the Cultural Revolution are the ones that ended up winning
the edit/follow-up from 2012 (which i definitely hadnt prior read) actually seems to double down on it further. i have no idea if this is just a case of poor translation or what.
Well I guess his larger abstract idea that "marxism doesnt address cultural values" and "cultural values are important and should be uniform through the state" remain unchanged it just seems like which specific cultural values those are has changed
Well I guess his larger abstract idea that "marxism doesnt address cultural values" and "cultural values are important and should be uniform through the state" remain unchanged it just seems like which specific cultural values those are has changed
Yeah, that's what i'm saying in my original post, was just saying it's way more transparent than i basically remembed it being by a long shot
My local psl chapter is a bunch of dyed hair redditors
Idc about dyed hair but if you're trying to "convert" the average american, having a dyed mohawk is not a good first impression
See I left PSL because of things like that, the chapter I was in had a decent number of members but only would do things over the internet. I had to beg them to go to a BLM protest and they all left early when they did.
The org I've been with for a year and a half now is full of regular working class people who are actually fighting for revolution instead of just talking about it. Plus one of the few communist orgs I've seen that isn't 85% white people who are weird.
I was mainly talking theoretically I dont think any AES upholds the Cultural Revolution, its mainly just maoist groups out there, if the PCP in Peru didnt massively f*** up maybe there, they got the closest to winning a protracted peoples war not including China of course. The other groups just have been stuck in strategic defence for what like 50 years now for both India and Philippines, its getting a little disheartening.
In Theory terms the cultural revolution is the last line of defence against a rising red capitalist class within the party, if the two line struggle against revisionism doesn't end up working, then its cultural revolution time baby lol. I guess a more concrete way of looking at it is that socialist projects will have twist and turns like how France had the monarchist reversals and the republicans reversing the reversal and such.
The interesting geopolitical part of this within communist movements is that since maoist see China currently as a capitalist nation using socialism essentially as an aesthetic, they would support another Maoist revolution would them but if he revolution that occur how much would it weaken China currently and how much stronger would it make US imperialism, I usually go on the side idk man.
How would it look in actuality I have no idea or if it would even be possible, other than vague slogans of bombard the headquarters
Thanks, that's all pretty interesting. Like I said I don't frequent these circles so I didn't really know most of that, although I do know the argument of "china is state capitalist with socialist aesthetics" vs "china is the last bastion of communism" is obviously widespread.
That's a good question though about if a Maoist revolution would simply make US imperialism stronger. I suppose the answer there has to basically be yes? If a Sino-Soviet split essentially made the US's power way stronger, then presumably a chinese self-split would basically do the same?
@krishna_bound If you have questions about Maoism, I can help. I'm like the resident KTT Maoist
Thanks, that's all pretty interesting. Like I said I don't frequent these circles so I didn't really know most of that, although I do know the argument of "china is state capitalist with socialist aesthetics" vs "china is the last bastion of communism" is obviously widespread.
That's a good question though about if a Maoist revolution would simply make US imperialism stronger. I suppose the answer there has to basically be yes? If a Sino-Soviet split essentially made the US's power way stronger, then presumably a chinese self-split would basically do the same?
Yeah I dont see it any other way either I guess I can hear the argument that a reborn maoist china can help aid groups like the Naxals and Philippines eventually but revolutions are a brutal and long process, the October revolution took 6 but I dont think we can see another revolution like that again , how long did the Chinese take 10 years? and thats not including the time to rebuild afterwards.
@Cudderwalks also im interested on ur opinion with a Maoist revolution within China and how much would it strengthen US Imperialism that would it be worth it ?
Also this at end of the day is just hypothesising about events that prob have very close to 0% of happening since the modern CCP is massively supported by their population
@krishna_bound If you have questions about Maoism, I can help. I'm like the resident KTT Maoist
I'd say most of questions don't come from the ideology itself but lack of understanding of prevalence of opinions or correct usages of certain terminologies (which to me seem to have other definition often) without coming from said background. This is virtually the only website or general place I interact with people who come from leftist backgrounds on, so I don't really know most leftist sensibilities or like mutual social cues, which makes discussion on my end difficult at times since it feels like I can be speaking a different language even if I've read the same materials.