Communism Thread

Page 1042 of 1355
Reply
  • Oct 24, 2022
    deadacc

    wonder if mark fisher ever heard trilogy

    seems like its everything he liked to nut over stewed together - burial, post punk, drake - although there's enough nostalgia bait that he would hate it as well.

    He def did

  • Oct 24, 2022
    chips

    the process of getting there was horribly inefficient but the fighter itself is brilliant

    just wish it looked more like a Tomcat or FF :(

    I think it’s pretty sexy, but the F22 clears

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Plankton

    Moron, the F35 has become a massive success. The Free World’s fighter

    It's main purpose is being masturbatory material for mouth breathers like you who think the world's number democracy overthrown cares about freedom

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    the reds

    It's main purpose is being masturbatory material for mouth breathers like you who think the world's number democracy overthrown cares about freedom

    Like I said, massive success

  • Oct 24, 2022
    Plankton

    Like I said, massive success

    Huge failure, cope

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    Just gon block this idiot, he's missed enough chances to display any signs of neuron activity

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    the reds

    Just gon block this idiot, he's missed enough chances to display any signs of neuron activity

    i mean, he's not fully wrong. Things like the goals of stuff like the F35 is a huge success for its intended audience, and you could arguably say the same thing about wars like Iraq. The people who aren't political sycophants to US hegemony aren't the target audience to be won over or create a***yses over what happened. An anti-US person would argue the US lost Vietnam due to causalities, territory losses, domestic support, and stated goals, a pro-US person would argue the US won since Vietnam ultimately became a capitalist country, a US ally, and a foreign receptacle of US global business interest. If people like him think it's a success or victory in some manner then the goal's been achieved, most people in this thread aren't the target audience of taken actions by the state.

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    2 replies

    everything about this article is infuriating (rhetorical questions below)

    1) why are we supposed to act like a cocaine doordash app is just a thing that's commonly known and acceptable
    2) why are these d*** addicts getting special treatment being treated like martyrs for a crisis affecting hundreds of thousands of americans
    3) what makes this situation more grave than the wider crisis crippling communities throughout the country and keeping people regularly ODing on the streets

    the language used in this article is really interesting if you want a transparent example of intra-group vs inter-group interactions

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound
    https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1584162746052259840

    everything about this article is infuriating (rhetorical questions below)

    1) why are we supposed to act like a cocaine doordash app is just a thing that's commonly known and acceptable
    2) why are these d*** addicts getting special treatment being treated like martyrs for a crisis affecting hundreds of thousands of americans
    3) what makes this situation more grave than the wider crisis crippling communities throughout the country and keeping people regularly ODing on the streets

    the language used in this article is really interesting if you want a transparent example of intra-group vs inter-group interactions

    first thing that popped out to me was cocaine delivery service

    like do they mean a regular d*** dealer who just comes by ur place or

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    krishna bound

    i mean, he's not fully wrong. Things like the goals of stuff like the F35 is a huge success for its intended audience, and you could arguably say the same thing about wars like Iraq. The people who aren't political sycophants to US hegemony aren't the target audience to be won over or create a***yses over what happened. An anti-US person would argue the US lost Vietnam due to causalities, territory losses, domestic support, and stated goals, a pro-US person would argue the US won since Vietnam ultimately became a capitalist country, a US ally, and a foreign receptacle of US global business interest. If people like him think it's a success or victory in some manner then the goal's been achieved, most people in this thread aren't the target audience of taken actions by the state.

    But I'm obviously not arguing from my perspective. Guys like Plankton are delusional so I wouldn't look to them for any sober assessment of ruling class perspective. If we're talking about the perspective of the Military Industrial Complex, sure they won. But they win regardless of any strategic outcome as long as the defense industry makes money and the officers climb up the career. If we're talking about the goal of the Vietnam War which was to stand up the southern puppet government then it failed. Sure in the long term Vietnam has undergone rapprochement with the U.S anyways not as a client state but under the terms of the Communist party and not as an outcome of the war itself. It's like like claiming the Nazis won WW2 because the EU ended up being established.

    Now for the F-35, the stated goals of making a cheap highly effective next gen plane for every branch of the US military I really don't see any argument where it's succeeded.

  • Oct 24, 2022
    Womanpuncher69

    first thing that popped out to me was cocaine delivery service

    like do they mean a regular d*** dealer who just comes by ur place or

    they got a doordash for cocaine for rich people in nyc apparently once again surprised no one has used that to carry out targeted p*litical as********ions.

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    the reds

    But I'm obviously not arguing from my perspective. Guys like Plankton are delusional so I wouldn't look to them for any sober assessment of ruling class perspective. If we're talking about the perspective of the Military Industrial Complex, sure they won. But they win regardless of any strategic outcome as long as the defense industry makes money and the officers climb up the career. If we're talking about the goal of the Vietnam War which was to stand up the southern puppet government then it failed. Sure in the long term Vietnam has undergone rapprochement with the U.S anyways not as a client state but under the terms of the Communist party and not as an outcome of the war itself. It's like like claiming the Nazis won WW2 because the EU ended up being established.

    Now for the F-35, the stated goals of making a cheap highly effective next gen plane for every branch of the US military I really don't see any argument where it's succeeded.

    I'm more saying that arguing over results don't matter as much when you're talking to someone who basically doesn't live in or share the same reality as you. I'm not actually saying you're wrong or saying I agree myself with the points in my post, i'm more saying that there's no point in any type of discussion with people who fundamentally live in a different reality. You can bring up whatever historical or economic facts you want, but it's only going to go as far as there exists a will to acknowledge it in return basically. Essentially you're wasting brainpower arguing or appealing to exterior political ideologies regardless of objectivity

  • Oct 24, 2022
    krishna bound

    I'm more saying that arguing over results don't matter as much when you're talking to someone who basically doesn't live in or share the same reality as you. I'm not actually saying you're wrong or saying I agree myself with the points in my post, i'm more saying that there's no point in any type of discussion with people who fundamentally live in a different reality. You can bring up whatever historical or economic facts you want, but it's only going to go as far as there exists a will to acknowledge it in return basically. Essentially you're wasting brainpower arguing or appealing to exterior political ideologies regardless of objectivity

    Sure yeah. I just ended up blocking him

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    the reds

    But I'm obviously not arguing from my perspective. Guys like Plankton are delusional so I wouldn't look to them for any sober assessment of ruling class perspective. If we're talking about the perspective of the Military Industrial Complex, sure they won. But they win regardless of any strategic outcome as long as the defense industry makes money and the officers climb up the career. If we're talking about the goal of the Vietnam War which was to stand up the southern puppet government then it failed. Sure in the long term Vietnam has undergone rapprochement with the U.S anyways not as a client state but under the terms of the Communist party and not as an outcome of the war itself. It's like like claiming the Nazis won WW2 because the EU ended up being established.

    Now for the F-35, the stated goals of making a cheap highly effective next gen plane for every branch of the US military I really don't see any argument where it's succeeded.

    Yea, I’m the delusional one. All those countries must be buying the F35 because it stinks. Turkey begging and screaming for a plane that’s a failure. Meanwhile the SU-57 can’t even make it into serial production

    The F35 is in service with every branch that operates fighter jets, so you’re just outright wrong about that

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Plankton

    Yea, I’m the delusional one. All those countries must be buying the F35 because it stinks. Turkey begging and screaming for a plane that’s a failure. Meanwhile the SU-57 can’t even make it into serial production

    The F35 is in service with every branch that operates fighter jets, so you’re just outright wrong about that

    Field tests saying that the fighter is woefully ineffective are obviously wrong because governments totally would never buy faulty products, especially on the taxpayers dime.

    They totally haven’t done that before

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    eye contact

    Field tests saying that the fighter is woefully ineffective are obviously wrong because governments totally would never buy faulty products, especially on the taxpayers dime.

    They totally haven’t done that before

    Field tests from when? 2006? The program faltered at first but has evolved over time to produce an excellent fighter. Everyone who follows defense knows this. Same thing happened to the F16 and it became the most produced, most iconic fighter of all time

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Plankton

    Field tests from when? 2006? The program faltered at first but has evolved over time to produce an excellent fighter. Everyone who follows defense knows this. Same thing happened to the F16 and it became the most produced, most iconic fighter of all time

    You think the F-16 was the most produced fighter of all time?

  • Oct 24, 2022

    Stupid dumb f***ing Americans

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    eye contact

    You think the F-16 was the most produced fighter of all time?

    I’ll take the L on that, dk why I thought that. Don’t have to be an a****** about it tho

  • Oct 24, 2022

    That’s crazy how plankton chooses to be in this thread.

    Is there someone quoting him back in here? Because you need to stop if so

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Plankton

    I’ll take the L on that, dk why I thought that. Don’t have to be an a****** about it tho

    You need to be bullied, don’t hate the messenger

  • Oct 24, 2022
    eye contact

    You need to be bullied, don’t hate the messenger

  • Oct 24, 2022

    This is a pro-bullying thread.

  • Oct 24, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Plankton

    CCP is a year out from indiscriminately killing civilians in Taiwan

    A conflict originating from a civil war is totally comparable to mass genocide, chattel slavery and unchecked imperialism I am very smart 🤓

  • Oct 24, 2022

    Has anyone said "the French revolution is killed in paris but dies at waterloo"?