The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is emblematic of the constraints on US weapons procurement that have held since the Cold War. Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs. This produced the worst of both worlds: The plane is more complex and heavier than separate planes for each branch would otherwise be, since the F-35 needs to include features for each service branch in a plane that will be used by all three, and, at the same time, three variants will be manufactured, losing much of the hoped-for cost savings of a single plane. The complexity of the plane increases the difficulty of manufacturing it without fatal defects. The F-35 prototypes have failed to meet its performance objectives and in war games simulations were easily shot down by existing Chinese and Russian fighters. Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin has convinced Congress and the Pentagon to move ahead with production even before the design flaws are resolved. American allies, such as Australia, have paid for a portion of the design costs and are committed to buying the planes, even though the versions they will get (which are in addition to the three variants for the US military) will lack some of the most advanced features, making them even more likely to be “clubbed like baby seals” in actual combat
TLDR: The US military is structured to lose fantasy wars with China and Russia and nothing else.
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is emblematic of the constraints on US weapons procurement that have held since the Cold War. Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs. This produced the worst of both worlds: The plane is more complex and heavier than separate planes for each branch would otherwise be, since the F-35 needs to include features for each service branch in a plane that will be used by all three, and, at the same time, three variants will be manufactured, losing much of the hoped-for cost savings of a single plane. The complexity of the plane increases the difficulty of manufacturing it without fatal defects. The F-35 prototypes have failed to meet its performance objectives and in war games simulations were easily shot down by existing Chinese and Russian fighters. Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin has convinced Congress and the Pentagon to move ahead with production even before the design flaws are resolved. American allies, such as Australia, have paid for a portion of the design costs and are committed to buying the planes, even though the versions they will get (which are in addition to the three variants for the US military) will lack some of the most advanced features, making them even more likely to be “clubbed like baby seals” in actual combat
TLDR: The US military is structured to lose fantasy wars with China and Russia and nothing else.
Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs.
How was this allowed to continue
Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs.
How was this allowed to continue
The authors' thesis is that these s***ty unusable weapons are the basis for every military officers career advancement and post-military careers and astronomic profit margins for defense contractors who provide sought after economic activity and campaign donations for congresspeople all over the U.S.
So Bush can end up with hundreds of billion dollar planes that are literally "undeployable" while running a shortage of basic necesseties like ammunitions and minesweepers
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is emblematic of the constraints on US weapons procurement that have held since the Cold War. Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs. This produced the worst of both worlds: The plane is more complex and heavier than separate planes for each branch would otherwise be, since the F-35 needs to include features for each service branch in a plane that will be used by all three, and, at the same time, three variants will be manufactured, losing much of the hoped-for cost savings of a single plane. The complexity of the plane increases the difficulty of manufacturing it without fatal defects. The F-35 prototypes have failed to meet its performance objectives and in war games simulations were easily shot down by existing Chinese and Russian fighters. Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin has convinced Congress and the Pentagon to move ahead with production even before the design flaws are resolved. American allies, such as Australia, have paid for a portion of the design costs and are committed to buying the planes, even though the versions they will get (which are in addition to the three variants for the US military) will lack some of the most advanced features, making them even more likely to be “clubbed like baby seals” in actual combat
TLDR: The US military is structured to lose fantasy wars with China and Russia and nothing else.
looks like we should fund them more
looks like we should fund them more
"the costs of weapons have risen far faster than inflation or GDP. The costs of fighter and bomber planes have escalated from $50,000 each during World War II, when the United States purchased 75,000 per annum, to $100 million for the F-15I and $2 billion for the B-2 in 1995 when the United States Air Force bought exactly 127 aircraft."
"the costs of weapons have risen far faster than inflation or GDP. The costs of fighter and bomber planes have escalated from $50,000 each during World War II, when the United States purchased 75,000 per annum, to $100 million for the F-15I and $2 billion for the B-2 in 1995 when the United States Air Force bought exactly 127 aircraft."
Broke: literally dominate the airspace of areas under your control and efficiently project power over advance areas
Woke: you can bomb one city anywhere at a time, for two days in a week, because you financially own the area (nobody there likes you). Nobody can detect you while you bomb the city but you’re the only one who does it, so they know it’s you. This costs the same amount
Broke: literally dominate the airspace of areas under your control and efficiently project power over advance areas
Woke: you can bomb one city anywhere at a time, for two days in a week, because you financially own the area (nobody there likes you). Nobody can detect you while you bomb the city but you’re the only one who does it, so they know it’s you. This costs the same amount
Internal reports say "the B-2 could not be deployed abroad because the skin of the plane cannot handle the heat or the damp or the rain” like ????????????? forget afghan rockets it literally cannot fly
Internal reports say "the B-2 could not be deployed abroad because the skin of the plane cannot handle the heat or the damp or the rain” like ????????????? forget afghan rockets it literally cannot fly
Also learned that defense industry workers are disproptionately unionized
More like the American hitler class am I right
wonder if mark fisher ever heard trilogy
seems like its everything he liked to nut over stewed together - burial, post punk, drake - although there's enough nostalgia bait that he would hate it as well.
wonder if mark fisher ever heard trilogy
seems like its everything he liked to nut over stewed together - burial, post punk, drake - although there's enough nostalgia bait that he would hate it as well.
k-punk
« NEW BLOGS | Main | ABSTRACT CULTURE »
APRIL 15, 2004
KANYE VERSUS PUFFY
On the Kanye debate between Blissblog and Woebot:
Simon: 'With Kanye, I just think it's intriguing how he's praised for doing something that Puff Daddy was reviled for. '
Hmmmm, interesting, but I think there are differences:
1.I think we need to insist upon the point that Simon somewhat grudgingly makes (re: mixtapes and DJing) that SELECTION is as important as ORIGINATION. In hyperdub culture, editing is not some secondary or derivative process; it's what everything's about. The contrast of Kanye with Puffy proves this; although their methodologies are similar , the results are very different. (Kanye is brilliant; Puffy was wack).
2. 'Through the Wire' is perhaps atypical of The College Dropout in being, as Simon says, almost exclusively based on one sample. Even 'Slowjamz' has much more music in it than 'Wire' (the hook is sung rather than sampled). Luke's favourite 'Jesus Walks', meanwhile, is a widescreen, Ray Harryhausen-style sonic epic.
3. As I recall - and I've thankfully managed to expunge the memory of most of Puffy's records - Puffy tended not to sample vocals, whereas most of Kanye's samples are of voice. Not sure what implication this has!
Posted by mark at April 15, 2004 06:45 PM
US did nothing to Muslims after 9/11. Actively protected them in fact. US is significantly less authoritarian now than it was in 1940s, FDR was an aberration. Comparing US to CCP is objectionable. Consider deleting and apologizing.
zack from the six ass post
Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all lived in the same neighborhood at the same time in Vienna.
Sitcom idea
been saying this
US did nothing to Muslims after 9/11. Actively protected them in fact. US is significantly less authoritarian now than it was in 1940s, FDR was an aberration. Comparing US to CCP is objectionable. Consider deleting and apologizing.
Dawg my country literally got bombed into the Stone Age by NATO. I literally l saw family members and neighbors die because of US led western aggression. In Iraq soldiers were known for desecrating masjids, terrorizing civilians and sexually assaulting women and girls. Like you genuinely must have been in special ed classes if you think the CCP is anywhere near comparable to the genocidal beast known as America
Dawg my country literally got bombed into the Stone Age by NATO. I literally l saw family members and neighbors die because of US led western aggression. In Iraq soldiers were known for desecrating masjids, terrorizing civilians and sexually assaulting women and girls. Like you genuinely must have been in special ed classes if you think the CCP is anywhere near comparable to the genocidal beast known as America
CCP is a year out from indiscriminately killing civilians in Taiwan
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is emblematic of the constraints on US weapons procurement that have held since the Cold War. Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs. This produced the worst of both worlds: The plane is more complex and heavier than separate planes for each branch would otherwise be, since the F-35 needs to include features for each service branch in a plane that will be used by all three, and, at the same time, three variants will be manufactured, losing much of the hoped-for cost savings of a single plane. The complexity of the plane increases the difficulty of manufacturing it without fatal defects. The F-35 prototypes have failed to meet its performance objectives and in war games simulations were easily shot down by existing Chinese and Russian fighters. Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin has convinced Congress and the Pentagon to move ahead with production even before the design flaws are resolved. American allies, such as Australia, have paid for a portion of the design costs and are committed to buying the planes, even though the versions they will get (which are in addition to the three variants for the US military) will lack some of the most advanced features, making them even more likely to be “clubbed like baby seals” in actual combat
TLDR: The US military is structured to lose fantasy wars with China and Russia and nothing else.
Moron, the F35 has become a massive success. The Free World’s fighter
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is emblematic of the constraints on US weapons procurement that have held since the Cold War. Conceived to save money with a single design that would be used by all branches of the military. However, the Air Force, Navy, and Marines were able to demand variants of the plane that would meet their particular needs. This produced the worst of both worlds: The plane is more complex and heavier than separate planes for each branch would otherwise be, since the F-35 needs to include features for each service branch in a plane that will be used by all three, and, at the same time, three variants will be manufactured, losing much of the hoped-for cost savings of a single plane. The complexity of the plane increases the difficulty of manufacturing it without fatal defects. The F-35 prototypes have failed to meet its performance objectives and in war games simulations were easily shot down by existing Chinese and Russian fighters. Nevertheless, Lockheed Martin has convinced Congress and the Pentagon to move ahead with production even before the design flaws are resolved. American allies, such as Australia, have paid for a portion of the design costs and are committed to buying the planes, even though the versions they will get (which are in addition to the three variants for the US military) will lack some of the most advanced features, making them even more likely to be “clubbed like baby seals” in actual combat
TLDR: The US military is structured to lose fantasy wars with China and Russia and nothing else.
the process of getting there was horribly inefficient but the fighter itself is brilliant
just wish it looked more like a Tomcat or FF :(