Thank god for king of pop

I'm out this thread Yall be easy

Yeah that totally makes sense bud. Instead of refuting the accuracy of a child describing your genitals. Not to mention that they settled the lawsuit immediately afterwards. If I'm being accused of something this terrible and I'm innocent, I'm fighting tooth and nail till the end. This is the man you're trying to defend btw:

When Johnnie Cochran tells you to settle you know he did that s***.

Guy cleared OJ with witnesses and blood present, but folded at some "fake" descriptions?

So, after doing some digging I’ve discovered that Chandler’s official description was never released.

the document you provided doesn’t actually give a description as to him being circumcised or not which is curious considering how the deputy who took the photographs and Chandler’s description (Deborah Linded) says otherwise

according to Lindens affidavit: “With Los Angeles Police Department detectives weighing his claims, Chandler gave them a roadmap to Jackson's below-the-waist geography, which, he said, includes distinctive "splotches" on his buttocks and one on his p****, "which is a light color similar to the color of his face." The boy's information was so precise, he even pinpointed where the splotch fell while Jackson's p**** was erect, the length of the performer's pubic hair, and that he was circumcised.”

So, what do we do from here? Chandler’s official description isnt public, and the report given from the investigating officer contradicts MJ’s autopsy.

you gotta wonder if @op is even doing anything for Thanksgiving

f***ing hell im arguing with a UFO conspirator on thanksgiving

Civil trial vs criminal trial.

Been explained a million times. Go project about child abuse elswhere

If the description was so accurate why did the prosecution file a motion in Jan 1994 asking for a second search?

“Jackson may provide copies of the police photographs, submit to a second search, or the court may bar the photographs from the civil trial as evidence.”

Why not fight to get them included no matter what? It’s a match at the end of the day, right?

Michael Jackson and his lawyers paid precisely to avoid having to go through a criminal trial. They did not want to drag out the matter and they confirmed this in different instances. Nobody pays to have the state accuse him, paying precisely benefited him by taking the problem off his shoulders. The lawyers and Michael Jackson himself have never stated that they were ready to face a criminal trial. In fact, all their justifications point to the fact that they wanted to avoid it.

No

It’s crazy how bad some of y’all want to see a man rape kids

😂😂😂

Maybe in the alternate reality you live in

Another wonderful excerpt from the chandlers own book;

You mean if they indict, the criminal case automatically goes before us?”
“Yeah.”
“Jesus Christ!”
“Right! So we don’t want that.” 1; page 201-202

But it was MJ actively avoiding criminal proceedings. 😂😂

What do you think the point of paying out a 25 million dollar lawsuit is? All the victims signed an NDA per the lawsuit so no criminal case was going to move forward after the lawsuit was paid out. That was the whole point. Important to note that Michael was already 30 million dollars in debt and had to take out a loan just to pay off this settlement. He was desperate for this not to go to trial

again, proven falsehoods. keep showing your low IQ then nigga. won’t be replying to your bum ass thread again

Here's a list of some of the books that Michael owned as well as a naked photo of a child who he hung out with. What do you think about this? Real normal guy over here

Dawg why am I sitting here on ktt on thanksgiving reading about MJ’s p**** marks what has my life come to it’s really over

man what

What are you confused about? This is all documented belongings that Michael owned

I’m just taken aback by reading this don’t mind me lol

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't MJ not want to settle out of court? Like settling wasn't his idea @KingOfPop