The Chandlers own book about the splotch;

Larry Feldman: “Oh, yeah, Lauren Weis (Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney) told me today that this disease Michael says he’s got, vitiligo, that it’s capable of changing anywhere you look, so that anything Jordie says is irrelevant. It can change very quickly with this disease.“

Evan Chandler: “Shit, these guys seem to have an answer for everything.”

Feldman: “No, that’s good for us!”

Chandler: “Why?”

Feldman: “Because if he’s right, he’s right. And if he’s wrong, we’ve got an explanation!”

Chandler: “Ha!”

Feldman: “Yeah, it’s a no-loser for us.”

Chandler: “That’s very good.”

Feldman: “Good? It’s terrific! You stick with the teeth, kid. I’m sticking’ with the law.” page 202-203

Buy the book. Go to that page. Pathetic imbecile.

I don't know, you tell me KingOfPop. I'll fact check it cause I'm willing bet it's more propaganda

Where did he meet those kids? Like how did he even end up hanging around them

Do that fact checking. Let me know what vanity fair wrote at the time. 👍

He met the Chandlers after his car broke down in 1992. They owned a rental car company.

Evan was the scorned distanced dad. Few months later, and no 20m movie contract, MJ was accused.

Quotes from their own book is propaganda.

Allergic to the truth. It’s hilarious

4 & 6 are nuts

Not sure how this debunks anything? Am I missing something or are you just an idiot

I’d be willing to bet you’re missing the point.

Their own book tells you why they plotted the splotch. It was a no lose decision.

Read up on the situation a bit more. Let me know which location for the splotch you actually believe.

You're cherry picking. They accurately described the mark on Michael's genitals. Based on that excerpt, they're saying that Vitiligo can lead to changes in appearance. This means that their description of Michael's genitals could of not been a match due to his disease changing it's appearance. Obviously, they were a match so all of this is irrelevant. That's what led to Michael settling a 25 million dollar lawsuit in record time

I googled “Jordan Chandlers description of Michael Jacksons genitalia” (christ) and every source I found that had reported on it mentions both blotches, and a circumcision. There’s a drawing i was able to find that also describes MJ as circumcised but im not certain it’s the official one. Either way it appears both these details are being pulled from the same source.

KOP has linked an abundance of resources pertaining to the actual facts of this case and it doesnt sound like youve engaged with literally any of it.

Stop letting OP troll y’all and enjoy your Thursday fellas

you’re right

yes he was a pedophile.

Chandlers father successfully extorted Mike because I believe Mike really did it (who cares what i think tho its just my opinion)

But what is a fact, is Chandlers family and lawyer were paid $25M and what is a fact, is that Jordie and Mike slept in the same bed numerous times

Only thing I ever want from you is to admit again that he f***ed up paying that settlement, its not agreeing with my views on him at all I can continue to think it was an admission of guilt and you will not thats ok

That payout was an L on his part you know it youve said it before you taught me about most of this s*** @KingOfPop

not sure what you're reading but here's an official excerpt from the Santa Barbara county police records

No circumcision is described. Only the marks.

Despite the perfect opportunity to highlight any discrepancies, or a complete mismatch, Jackson’s defence team, did the complete opposite and fought tooth and nail to keep the description and photographs out of the courtroom.

Then immediately decided to settle a 25 million dollar lawsuit afterwards....

He had no other option. His whole defense team of big shot lawyers told him to settle, he had no chance of winning after the kid described his genitals accurately

The person tasked with proving a case against Michael Jackson said...there was evidence that would prove their case against Michael Jackson

And the defense didn't refute the claims but instead fought so it would not be brought into the courtroom Then when they failed, decided to settle a 25 million dollar lawsuit

People like @op are exactly why I said in the P Diddy thread that "Settling = guilty" is a dangerous mindset to have and should be abandoned. Now that wasn't the best thread to post it in but this is why I hate it. You have people convinced that someone settled solely because they actually did that s***

The answer to why the defense would not want this evidence in court is at the top of this page bruh

Puff innocent