Nov 23, 2023
KobeToThaIf the FBI couldn’t find the evidence needed to metaphorically kill MJ, then idk
yk what i mean
Nov 23, 2023There's that f***ing Variety Fair article again what year is it
Of course not
OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyvorioxno i ain't you f***in idiot lmfao.
i can guarantee i know more about this case than you. we can talk only after you've educated yourself. if you won't, shut yo butchass up then
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLX6AG8GV5dZYL0t2mlZoAeMzd3vnULkCa&si=j75TyKVRhCzxBJw3
everything you need to know is in this documentary series, but i know you won't be watching it with your tiktok ass attention span.A series created by Michael Jackson Stans. The undeniable facts in the case is that Michael had literal books with naked kids, He slept in the same bed as these kids unsupervised, erotic magazines which had fingerprints from the children, and one of the kids accurately described the mark under Michael's genitals.
- OPNov 23, 2023·2 replies
WRUOP obviously just wanted to troll its clear he dont care about nothing and made up his mind before creating this thread, now hes looking for like minded idiots to 'have fun' with making tarded parallels with current events trying to find 'leaps in logic' and whatever other troll s***
I take the abuse of children very seriously, I'm not here to troll. I genuinely wanted to have a healthy discussion now that I know the facts in this case. I'm actually surprised that this is so controversial after knowing all the facts. Seems obvious that this nigga was a pedophile
Nov 23, 2023SlutdogI take the abuse of children very seriously, I'm not here to troll. I genuinely wanted to have a healthy discussion now that I know the facts in this case. I'm actually surprised that this is so controversial after knowing all the facts. Seems obvious that this nigga was a pedophile
“after knowing all the facts” gimme a break dawg
Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdogI take the abuse of children very seriously, I'm not here to troll. I genuinely wanted to have a healthy discussion now that I know the facts in this case. I'm actually surprised that this is so controversial after knowing all the facts. Seems obvious that this nigga was a pedophile
You don’t take any of this s*** seriously and to pretend you do continues to spit in the face of genuine child abuse victims worldwide.
F***ing loser
- OPNov 23, 2023·2 replies
Nortthat “specific mark” would be consistent with how the rest of his f***ing body looked
Cope. You don't even know what the mark looked like and the sketch that the child made has never been released. What we know is the district attorney who was behind that says it's a match so it was clearly undeniable
- OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyKingOfPop
You don’t take any of this s*** seriously and to pretend you do continues to spit in the face of genuine child abuse victims worldwide.
F***ing loser
Bro Michael had literal books with naked kids, He slept in the same bed as these kids unsupervised, erotic magazines which had fingerprints from the children, and one of the kids accurately described the mark under Michael's genitals. There's a possibility that he didn't touch those kids (very unlikely) but at the very least, he exposed explicit content to them, showed his naked body to them, and was clearly attracted to children
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdog
Bro Michael had literal books with naked kids, He slept in the same bed as these kids unsupervised, erotic magazines which had fingerprints from the children, and one of the kids accurately described the mark under Michael's genitals. There's a possibility that he didn't touch those kids (very unlikely) but at the very least, he exposed explicit content to them, showed his naked body to them, and was clearly attracted to children
It’s not very unlikely at all. You’ve had numerous people prove you wrong for 15 straight pages.
Vanity Fair wrote about the genius of Epstein. Do you believe that too?
- Nov 23, 2023
Nov 23, 2023Tbh bread took an insane turn on the second page
- OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyKingOfPop
It’s not very unlikely at all. You’ve had numerous people prove you wrong for 15 straight pages.
Vanity Fair wrote about the genius of Epstein. Do you believe that too?
It's very telling that you aren't addressing any of my other points. Vanity Fair is irrelevant, I'm strictly talking about the facts in the case which are damning. I'll say it again: Michael had literal books with naked kids, He slept in the same bed as these kids unsupervised, erotic magazines which had fingerprints from the children (signs of grooming), and one of the kids accurately described the mark under Michael's genitals. If this wasn't Michael, it wouldn't be a discussion
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdog
It's very telling that you aren't addressing any of my other points. Vanity Fair is irrelevant, I'm strictly talking about the facts in the case which are damning. I'll say it again: Michael had literal books with naked kids, He slept in the same bed as these kids unsupervised, erotic magazines which had fingerprints from the children (signs of grooming), and one of the kids accurately described the mark under Michael's genitals. If this wasn't Michael, it wouldn't be a discussion
None of the stuff you claim, all of which comes from this article, is true or accurate.
Have you read anything from the thread or any of the links posted?
What language do you need it in to actually digest the truth?
Stop parroting bullshit.
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdog
Cope. You don't even know what the mark looked like and the sketch that the child made has never been released. What we know is the district attorney who was behind that says it's a match so it was clearly undeniable
im sure it looked like the other blotches that covered his body.
- Nov 23, 2023LOUD
MJ dont like kids, kids like MJ
- OPNov 23, 2023KingOfPop
None of the stuff you claim, all of which comes from this article, is true or accurate.
Have you read anything from the thread or any of the links posted?
https://meanmachine829.medium.com/10-undeniable-fake-news-about-mj-an-easily-debunkable-racist-vanity-fair-article-93d461833978
What language do you need it in to actually digest the truth?
Stop parroting bullshit.
Well for 1, that article literally has a drawing which they allege came from the child. The child's drawing of Michael's genitals were never released to the public. And they accurately described the mark under his p****, no talk of circumcision aside from act fake drawing. Here's the DA confirming this
They didn't even debunk #6 lol. Michael still had books of naked kids. They were technically "legal" but they're pretty much just legal forms of CP. Michael even went on an interview and said he was "gifted" these and never read them but they were literally locked in a safe and had writing from Michael inside of them. Straight up lie right there.
That alone tells me that the credibility of this website you linked is low. Clearly a Michael Jackson fanboy trying to protect their idol. Celebrity worship is a disease, truly.
Nov 23, 2023Somebody not backing down from kingofpop
- Nov 23, 2023Slutdog
Stans when Michael Jackson sleeps in the same bed as children he's not related to:
a serious comment from someone concerned with child molestation. foh
rvi 🦜Nov 23, 2023·2 repliesNortim sure it looked like the other blotches that covered his body.
there's a huge variation in how vitiligo presents itself across the body, size/shape/area affected by the blotches etc. do we know any more detail about the description/sketch? like i feel like its a big difference if its something like "there was a blotch" vs "there was one specific blotch with this shape and size in this exact location"
- OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyrvi
there's a huge variation in how vitiligo presents itself across the body, size/shape/area affected by the blotches etc. do we know any more detail about the description/sketch? like i feel like its a big difference if its something like "there was a blotch" vs "there was one specific blotch with this shape and size in this exact location"
All you need to know is that Michael immediately settled for the 25 million dollar lawsuit after his genitals came back as a match with the child's description
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdog
All you need to know is that Michael immediately settled for the 25 million dollar lawsuit after his genitals came back as a match with the child's description
There’s been at least 3 different depictions of the description.
The settlement happened when the civil trial was going to precede the criminal one.
The chandlers continued to cooperate for months after.
Stop peddling bullshit. The drawing came from chandlers own book. You’d know this if you researched and not read vanity fair while stalking losers on Twitter with 5 likes who pretend to hate MJ yet spend all day talking about him.
- Nort 💫Nov 23, 2023·1 replyrvi
there's a huge variation in how vitiligo presents itself across the body, size/shape/area affected by the blotches etc. do we know any more detail about the description/sketch? like i feel like its a big difference if its something like "there was a blotch" vs "there was one specific blotch with this shape and size in this exact location"
to my knowledge, we dont know many other details about it. his description also said MJ was cut, which contradicts his autopsy report. Sounds like he just got lucky guessing there was a blotch on his p****, which isnt even that impressive considering how he had blotches scattered all over his body.
- OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyKingOfPop
There’s been at least 3 different depictions of the description.
The settlement happened when the civil trial was going to precede the criminal one.
The chandlers continued to cooperate for months after.
Stop peddling bullshit. The drawing came from chandlers own book. You’d know this if you researched and not read vanity fair while stalking losers on Twitter with 5 likes who pretend to hate MJ yet spend all day talking about him.
There was NDAs apart of the lawsuit. The investigation wasn't going anywhere after that settlement was reached bro. Without the victim’s cooperation there is no case. Show the source for that drawing then because the real drawing was never released and that's a fact. The real drawing accurately described Michael's genitals and lo and behold, Michael immediately settles a 25 million dollar lawsuit after those results come back
- OPNov 23, 2023·1 replyNort
to my knowledge, we dont know many other details about it. his description also said MJ was cut, which contradicts his autopsy report. Sounds like he just got lucky guessing there was a blotch on his p****, which isnt even that impressive considering how he had blotches scattered all over his body.
There is no source for the child saying he was circumcised. That's false
- Nov 23, 2023·1 replySlutdog
There was NDAs apart of the lawsuit. The investigation wasn't going anywhere after that settlement was reached bro. Without the victim’s cooperation there is no case. Show the source for that drawing then because the real drawing was never released and that's a fact. The real drawing accurately described Michael's genitals and lo and behold, Michael immediately settles a 25 million dollar lawsuit after those results come back
What did the chandler laywer file in january 1994 that proves what you said is bullshit then Mr I Know The Facts