Bro can y’all chill lol . I’m not saying the game is trash or bad . I’m just saying that some people may prefer to pay 70 for longer games . Length being the bases on how quick someone wants to shell out full price is reasonable . That’s literally all I’m saying (also some people may wish the game was a few hours longer . Not sure what’s wrong with that)
These are complaints that some people had about the first game . Complaints don’t mean the game isn’t great
It literally makes no sense.
By that token, Baldur’s Gate 3 for instance should be like $250.
Yeah, with side quests included.
Spider-Man 2 is the same length with side quests included.
It’s just the main story that’s 17 hours, just like the first game
We’ll see how long it feels.
If I finish it in a day I’ll be pissed. Still raises the argument that 60/70 for sub-20 hour playthrough, AAA titles is wild
It literally makes no sense.
By that token, Baldur’s Gate 3 for instance should be like $250.
??I'm not sure what your point is. Im not saying a full games worth is its length. Im just saying I can understand that being a factor into if someone wants to pay full price immediately or wait for a price drop.
Just like how art style is a factor for people, or certain gameplay loops, or RPG elements. I just don't see why length is excluded as a factor as well.
I'm convinced yall just want to argue cause this is the softest take ive had on this site
We’ll see how long it feels.
If I finish it in a day I’ll be pissed. Still raises the argument that 60/70 for sub-20 hour playthrough, AAA titles is wild
Would you rather the game just be arbitrarily full of filler content that ultimately drags the whole thing down?
Like goddamn, no wonder Ubisoft just keeps putting out mid ass titles.
Man is about to beat a 25+ hour game in under 24 hours.
My playthrough was 30 hours.
Either way I’ll be doing side quests first.
Yea if you do sidequests and stuff both the first game and this one will be 30~ hours.
We’ll see how long it feels.
If I finish it in a day I’ll be pissed. Still raises the argument that 60/70 for sub-20 hour playthrough, AAA titles is wild
Why is that wild lol. Some of yall are on some s*** man
How the f*** did we get to the point where people think 60/70 bucks for a 15-20 hour game is "wild". Nah we gotta erase Ubisoft from history bro
Nigga we talking about villains we didn't know we're even in the game
I haven’t seen a zero spoiler yet
But bruh all due respect
Its Spiderman
What type spoiler would get me upset over Spiderman
You can name 5 spiderman villains that weren’t in first game and it will be one of those
And I’m not even trying to be an a******
Its just Spiderman 😂
Why is that wild lol. Some of yall are on some s*** man
How the f*** did we get to the point where people think 60/70 bucks for a 15-20 hour game is "wild". Nah we gotta erase Ubisoft from history bro
I been on KTT on and off since 2014 and bruh I have much more LEFT takes than what these people talking about
I dont even want to open my mouth about topics and 99% of the time I don’t
i have every save slot in spiderman ps4 100%'d
im a dumb guy i like dumb guy stuff in games sometimes tbh.
a bunch of enemy outposts that are basically same thing, letting you do spiderman recon missions is fun to me. a warehouse full of goons to take out is part of the dream game fantasies i grew up with!
getting the enemy routes in the stealth challenges committed to memory so you can ping-pong around the entire thing, taking out a whole camp in 60 seconds without being caught
the backpacks with wider spider-man lore easter eggs are fun, i liked taking pics of NYC landmarks and peter having a quip for most of them.
and tbh i'm actually gonna miss some of this boring run-time padding stuff (not sure if any of this is not in the game, im assuming)
Would you rather the game just be arbitrarily full of filler content that ultimately drags the whole thing down?
Like goddamn, no wonder Ubisoft just keeps putting out mid ass titles.
Man is about to beat a 25+ hour game in under 24 hours.
No, I'd rather devs spend 3-5 years between titles that are actively filled with content (i.e GTA 4, Fallout series).
You s*** on Ubisoft but GR: Wildlands was one of the best games of last gen lol
No, I'd rather devs spend 3-5 years between titles that are actively filled with content (i.e GTA 4, Fallout series).
You s*** on Ubisoft but GR: Wildlands was one of the best games of last gen lol
It’s a damn shame Ubisoft hasn’t given Wildlands a 60FPS update yet.

It’s a damn shame Ubisoft hasn’t given Wildlands a 60FPS update yet.

They really ruined the series with Breakpoint but f*** me Wildlands was goated.
Ambient radio soundtrack whilst riding around causing chaos
We’ll see how long it feels.
If I finish it in a day I’ll be pissed. Still raises the argument that 60/70 for sub-20 hour playthrough, AAA titles is wild
You won’t finish it in a day unless you’re playing 17 hours in the first day lmao
Why is that wild lol. Some of yall are on some s*** man
How the f*** did we get to the point where people think 60/70 bucks for a 15-20 hour game is "wild". Nah we gotta erase Ubisoft from history bro
I agree with you on principle but I cant think of a game thats worth 60/70€ and only 15 hours long with low replayability
“Not a lot of changes” reviewers when they give Tears of the Kingdom a 10 💔💔💔
Yeah, with side quests included.
Spider-Man 2 is the same length with side quests included.
It’s just the main story that’s 17 hours, just like the first game
in
its a beat em up about 15-20 hours is just right if you want a longer game raise the difficulty level I am more curious are the boss fights fire