I can only hope your username is a troll and not an accurate representation of ur person.
classic low hanging fruit response
ima rob u then get off scott free at "rehab"
naive b****
classic low hanging fruit response
ima rob u then get off scott free at "rehab"
naive b****
i mean, its not like the response you gave was really worthy of anything else. going to put u on ignore now bye.
i mean, its not like the response you gave was really worthy of anything else. going to put u on ignore now bye.
ur just another dumb f*** in college who think they have some revolutionary ideas
get back in line BOI
The argument you are making can be used in any type of punishment. There's millions of people who are wrongfully convicted and spend the rest of their lives in prison so should we free everyone in prison? No.
Like I said, the requirements to seek the death penalty should be changed, however the people like Dylann roof, nicholas cruz and jared Loughner should be dead and deserve to be dead.
Ehh a little different
Once ur dead ur dead aint no coming back from that even if you are proven innocent later
U still have at least a little chance of being free from jail if your innocently convicted of a crime
Ehh a little different
Once ur dead ur dead aint no coming back from that even if you are proven innocent later
U still have at least a little chance of being free from jail if your innocently convicted of a crime
B**** did you not read where I said the requirements need to be changed for the death penalty
B**** did you not read where I said the requirements need to be changed for the death penalty
I mean if you guarantee that no innocent people will die than s*** I wouldnt be against the death penalty for extrme circumstances but idk how easy that would be
I mean if you guarantee that no innocent people will die than s*** I wouldnt be against the death penalty for extrme circumstances but idk how easy that would be
You cant guarantee anything just like you cant guarantee every person you lock in prison for the rest of their life is guilty
The argument you are making can be used in any type of punishment. There's millions of people who are wrongfully convicted and spend the rest of their lives in prison so should we free everyone in prison? No.
Like I said, the requirements to seek the death penalty should be changed, however the people like Dylann roof, nicholas cruz and jared Loughner should be dead and deserve to be dead.
Wrong.. You seem to miss the big distinction in life vs execution... Without the death penalty we won't have any more people executed that are innocent and given that people have been later found to be innocent through dna evidence and other means and freed... The people who were found to be innocent posthumously would've been freed instead of executed...
Wrong.. You seem to miss the big distinction in life vs execution... Without the death penalty we won't have any more people executed that are innocent and given that people have been later found to be innocent through dna evidence and other means and freed... The people who were found to be innocent posthumously would've been freed instead of executed...
Do you read other people's opinions or do you just go off of what you think is best?
This may be difficult for you to comprehend but if I am asking for changes to seeking the death penalty then maybe that will lower the number of death row candidats and increase the evidence, proof of burden etc.
Yes, that's why it's a process. I don't see why, as time moves on, we can't get rid of all of those ugly forms of bigotry. You kill off institutional racism, xenophobia, transphobia, religious bigotry etc., If a behavior is learned, it can be unlearned and eventually it can get to the point where it's never even taught. Especially if you take away the influential systemic factors.
I also don't accept that there has to be public demonization at all. Again we're talking about a radical transformation of society and its values. Right now we demonize these people because that's what is accepted in society. No one is going to get on you for shaming a pedophile, even if theyve committed no crime, but what if it wasn't socially acceptable to demonize them?
As for sociopaths, well I see no reason we can't eliminate a condition based on sociological factors. Psychopaths are different, but there is some environmental aspect at play with them as well.
I'm not talking about institutional racism/bigotry... We can definitely change or reduce that... I'm talking about personal, individual, and generational... You can't take away the most influential factors like their family members and upbringing... Why do you think so many people are indoctrinated into so many different religions and beliefs... You think you can just make people unlearn things ingrained in them like that? People are flawed inherently... There will always be people that hold irrational beliefs... You can't control thought.. You think people believe these things just because a lack of information? Breaking free from indoctrination is a very difficult thing for most people to ever do... Many can't .. Gay rights have come a long way, but there will always be some people who denigrate or hate homosexuals because their beliefs are informed by other things like religion or their family which influence their whole worldview... You can't just hand wave away these things.. You're taking a very idealistic view with no basis in reality to support such a thing.
How can you eliminate those factors? Someone else is raising them and influencing them as they grow from adolescents...What are you advocating for being done? Cmon bruh
Do you read other people's opinions or do you just go off of what you think is best?
This may be difficult for you to comprehend but if I am asking for changes to seeking the death penalty then maybe that will lower the number of death row candidats and increase the evidence, proof of burden etc.
I'm referring to your objection to what I said and the comment of "why don't we just free everyone because some could be innocent with the same logic"... But that's not the same logic.... Big difference between life with the possibility of being found innocent and execution...
I responded to that already... They would need to be changes that assures no one innocent ever gets found guilty and put to death.. And I made the other argument for severe mental illness.
I'm referring to your objection to what I said and the comment of "why don't we just free everyone because some could be innocent with the same logic"... But that's not the same logic.... Big difference between life with the possibility of being found innocent and execution...
I responded to that already... They would need to be changes that assures no one innocent ever gets found guilty and put to death.. And I made the other argument for severe mental illness.
Why are we having this conversation if you agree that there is a place for it if some changes are made?
You did all that typing to agree with what I initially said lol
Why are we having this conversation if you agree that there is a place for it if some changes are made?
You did all that typing to agree with what I initially said lol
Because I don't agree... You'd have to convince me by putting forward such a system and telling me how it would work.. If its anything like our current system.. I can't support it.
Because I don't agree... You'd have to convince me by putting forward such a system and telling me how it would work.. If its anything like our current system.. I can't support it.
So do you agree that dylann roof (multiple witnesses left alive so they could tell the world what he did) and jared Loughner (multiple witnesses and subdued at the scene of the crime) should they serve life in prison or should they be executed?
I'm not talking about institutional racism/bigotry... We can definitely change or reduce that... I'm talking about personal, individual, and generational... You can't take away the most influential factors like their family members and upbringing... Why do you think so many people are indoctrinated into so many different religions and beliefs... You think you can just make people unlearn things ingrained in them like that? People are flawed inherently... There will always be people that hold irrational beliefs... You can't control thought.. You think people believe these things just because a lack of information? Breaking free from indoctrination is a very difficult thing for most people to ever do... Many can't .. Gay rights have come a long way, but there will always be some people who denigrate or hate homosexuals because their beliefs are informed by other things like religion or their family which influence their whole worldview... You can't just hand wave away these things.. You're taking a very idealistic view with no basis in reality to support such a thing.
How can you eliminate those factors? Someone else is raising them and influencing them as they grow from adolescents...What are you advocating for being done? Cmon bruh
Well, if you're reducing institutional racism/bigotry then you are indeed going to be reducing personal/individual racism/bigotry in the process, because systemic factors do influence individual beliefs. We have the demonization of muslims after 9/11, Reagan conjuring up the image of the black welfare queen, segregation, the "job stealing mexican immigrant" etc., etc., It all plays on fear of the other and it fuels individuals to hold racist beliefs. You remove these factors, place a higher emphasis on education, especially collective education, then you begin removing generational affects, especially in a society where equality is doctrine to begin with. And as I mentioned to someone else earlier, the whole point about "not having a basis in reality" is irrelevant, because there have been many changes made throughout history that seemingly had no basis in reality until one day they were. Striving for an ideological goal is no way a bad thing.
So basically, you eliminate systemic factors that influence individual beliefs, end all forms of private discrimination, form a society based on equality, collective education practices, etc., Even if you want to go the indoctrination route, I see no difference why it wouldn't be the same as with political views. Most kids, at an early age, show tendencies of sharing the same political views and values as their parents. As they grow older, they usually tend to break from those values as they socialize with other groups.
So do you agree that dylann roof (multiple witnesses left alive so they could tell the world what he did) and jared Loughner (multiple witnesses and subdued at the scene of the crime) should they serve life in prison or should they be executed?
I have no problem with him being executed... I'm asking you... What's the law or legislation gonna be? What will be the limits to the death penalty? Who will be eligible and under what circumstances? Etc
I have no problem with him being executed... I'm asking you... What's the law or legislation gonna be? What will be the limits to the death penalty? Who will be eligible and under what circumstances? Etc
Not my job lol I'm telling you that it can and should be used.
Tension in Rockets fam I love it ๐
lets see somebody rape and kill ur entire family and u still preaching for them to go to rehab ๐น๐น
Got his goofy ass ๐๐๐๐
Well, if you're reducing institutional racism/bigotry then you are indeed going to be reducing personal/individual racism/bigotry in the process, because systemic factors do influence individual beliefs. We have the demonization of muslims after 9/11, Reagan conjuring up the image of the black welfare queen, segregation, the "job stealing mexican immigrant" etc., etc., It all plays on fear of the other and it fuels individuals to hold racist beliefs. You remove these factors, place a higher emphasis on education, especially collective education, then you begin removing generational affects, especially in a society where equality is doctrine to begin with. And as I mentioned to someone else earlier, the whole point about "not having a basis in reality" is irrelevant, because there have been many changes made throughout history that seemingly had no basis in reality until one day they were. Striving for an ideological goal is no way a bad thing.
So basically, you eliminate systemic factors that influence individual beliefs, end all forms of private discrimination, form a society based on equality, collective education practices, etc., Even if you want to go the indoctrination route, I see no difference why it wouldn't be the same as with political views. Most kids, at an early age, show tendencies of sharing the same political views and values as their parents. As they grow older, they usually tend to break from those values as they socialize with other groups.
When I say it doesn't have a basis in reality and that there will always be people that will hold irrational beliefs I'm not talking about "changes we made in the past" like what you're referring to.. Like laws and societal norms... I'm talking about thoughts and beliefs that have been around for well over a millenia.. I'm talking about people's upbringing and worldview which is why I mentioned indoctrination and religion as an example.... There's no basis in reality for this and people are inherently flawed... I'm saying it's not possible to eliminate those beliefs and views.. You're also leading yourself down to a point where you'll have to impose laws to ban certain beliefs, religions, and censor speech... Basically straight up authoritarianism.
Not my job lol I'm telling you that it can and should be used.
If you can't do that, then it's pointless.... That's the only way to defend the position or you may as well say you're fine with executing innocent people as long as most of the time we execute guilty ones.
If you can't do that, then it's pointless.... That's the only way to defend the position or you may as well say you're fine with executing innocent people as long as most of the time we execute guilty ones.
Hate to call you a but... me saying that some people have been proven guilty without a doubt and deserve to be executed is not the same as me saying that all people on death row should be executed lol
There is a place for executions and you agree with me. That's all we were talking about. I am not a lawmaker and neither are you
Hate to call you a but... me saying that some people have been proven guilty without a doubt and deserve to be executed is not the same as me saying that all people on death row should be executed lol
There is a place for executions and you agree with me. That's all we were talking about. I am not a lawmaker and neither are you
That's the problem though... I don't agree there's a place for executions if it can lead to innocent people being executed.... You haven't explained laid out any of the things I asked to assure that... so I can't agree.. And we have a current system made by lawmakers that demonstrably doesn't assure that and has killed hundreds of innocent people.