Liberal means progressive. That’s the definition of the word. You’re distorting definitions. The term neoliberal is linguistically derived from the market definition of liberal (liberal as in free, unregulated markets) same as libertarianism. Neoliberalism is not a term that is derived from the political definition of liberal (progressive).
Trump has one of the lowest approval ratings on record. His approval rating is consistently lower than his 2016 popular vote %. That entire gap is voters who are up for grabs and Tusli is the best Vp candidate to win them
Forget the buzzwords I misused. The point is, Tulsi is unpopular with many Democrats. Those who follow mainstream news think she is a Russian shill and Assad apologist. They are repulsed by the fact that she voted “present” on impeachment. They hate that she is willing to go on Breitbart and Tucker Carlson Tonight. They see her as a crypto-Republican. Many would hold their nose and vote for the Bernie/Tulsi ticket anyway— but not all. Bernie himself is already a thorn in the side of the Democratic establishment. Picking Tulsi is just throwing gas on the fire. Independents and Republicans flirting with voting Dem may like her foreign policy and willingness to treat them like humans, but her domestic policy is stock Democrat fare and will repulse many of them— particularly if she is second-in-command to Bernie “Abolish ICE” Sanders. Will Bernie pick up anti-Trump moderates? Sure. He needs to in order to win. But he also needs to get the Democratic base on his side and turning out to vote for him in big numbers. In my opinion, a controversial figure like Tulsi— who should be a perfect VP pick on paper— is just not the panacea to building a winning coalition and increase turnout from the Democratic base. Who is that person? I don’t know. Maybe I’m wrong and Tulsi is actually the way to go. But it’s not clear cut at all.
Or just support Yang who has more rounded ideas he feels the same way about
im not sure what youre saying hear
im not sure what youre saying hear
I’m saying there’s clear reasons why some people prefer Yang
Or just support Yang who has more rounded ideas he feels the same way about
Yang will get 0 delegates and not make the next debate b just vote for bernie
Yang will get 0 delegates and not make the next debate b just vote for bernie
I am voting Bernie, wasn’t talking about me
This would be comedy
The advantages of picking someone to Bernie's left like Tlaib is it would discourage attempts to remove him while it also satisfies the identity politics liberals are so obsessed about. The white people in the rustbelt would still like bernie.
Also helps that michigan is a swing state that we definitely need, and its lowkey cool to have a jewish/Palestinian administration
The advantages of picking someone to Bernie's left like Tlaib is it would discourage attempts to remove him while it also satisfies the identity politics liberals are so obsessed about. The white people in the rustbelt would still like bernie.
Bad idea, sorry
American mfs love Israel, simple as
Even Michigan’s Dem senators are anti-BDS
The squad, Allah love em, are the leftist boogiemen the GOP will try and tie any Democrat presidential nominee to
Why do the work for them?
Forget the buzzwords I misused. The point is, Tulsi is unpopular with many Democrats. Those who follow mainstream news think she is a Russian shill and Assad apologist. They are repulsed by the fact that she voted “present” on impeachment. They hate that she is willing to go on Breitbart and Tucker Carlson Tonight. They see her as a crypto-Republican. Many would hold their nose and vote for the Bernie/Tulsi ticket anyway— but not all. Bernie himself is already a thorn in the side of the Democratic establishment. Picking Tulsi is just throwing gas on the fire. Independents and Republicans flirting with voting Dem may like her foreign policy and willingness to treat them like humans, but her domestic policy is stock Democrat fare and will repulse many of them— particularly if she is second-in-command to Bernie “Abolish ICE” Sanders. Will Bernie pick up anti-Trump moderates? Sure. He needs to in order to win. But he also needs to get the Democratic base on his side and turning out to vote for him in big numbers. In my opinion, a controversial figure like Tulsi— who should be a perfect VP pick on paper— is just not the panacea to building a winning coalition and increase turnout from the Democratic base. Who is that person? I don’t know. Maybe I’m wrong and Tulsi is actually the way to go. But it’s not clear cut at all.
Bernie cant build a coalition
Forget the buzzwords I misused. The point is, Tulsi is unpopular with many Democrats. Those who follow mainstream news think she is a Russian shill and Assad apologist. They are repulsed by the fact that she voted “present” on impeachment. They hate that she is willing to go on Breitbart and Tucker Carlson Tonight. They see her as a crypto-Republican. Many would hold their nose and vote for the Bernie/Tulsi ticket anyway— but not all. Bernie himself is already a thorn in the side of the Democratic establishment. Picking Tulsi is just throwing gas on the fire. Independents and Republicans flirting with voting Dem may like her foreign policy and willingness to treat them like humans, but her domestic policy is stock Democrat fare and will repulse many of them— particularly if she is second-in-command to Bernie “Abolish ICE” Sanders. Will Bernie pick up anti-Trump moderates? Sure. He needs to in order to win. But he also needs to get the Democratic base on his side and turning out to vote for him in big numbers. In my opinion, a controversial figure like Tulsi— who should be a perfect VP pick on paper— is just not the panacea to building a winning coalition and increase turnout from the Democratic base. Who is that person? I don’t know. Maybe I’m wrong and Tulsi is actually the way to go. But it’s not clear cut at all.
her domestic policy barely exists. she's tabula rasa. theres almost nothing for anyone to oppose. I see her picking up swing voters and I have a hard time believing a sizable portion of democratic voters will not vote just because some guys in a wine cave don't like Bernie and don't like tulsi. populism wins elections
you are typing a lot but not really saying anything lol. but yes, republicans are liberals. democrats are liberals, and moderates are liberals. markets and free trade are not promoted by democratic socialism. they are a key component to liberalism. this is really just not difficult to understand at all


yes, ive already said that dem socialism has been b******ized in the united states. still doesn't excuse the fact that these words have meaning lol. if you aren't for the eradication of private property and capitalism, you aren't a socialist by any means
Bad idea, sorry
American mfs love Israel, simple as
Even Michigan’s Dem senators are anti-BDS
The squad, Allah love em, are the leftist boogiemen the GOP will try and tie any Democrat presidential nominee to
Why do the work for them?
Michigan is like the US arab capital
hella Palestinians there too
dnc really about to just give bloomberg the nom
I cannot believe how transparent about this they are. they're changing rules only for him. at least hide it if you're going to be corrupt like this lmao
relevant:
Michigan is like the US arab capital
hella Palestinians there too
True
Hence Tlaib
I still think it would be a challenge for her though if, for instance, she ran in a statewide election
Bad idea, sorry
American mfs love Israel, simple as
Even Michigan’s Dem senators are anti-BDS
The squad, Allah love em, are the leftist boogiemen the GOP will try and tie any Democrat presidential nominee to
Why do the work for them?
Using this logic you'd vote for biden
We’re really debating whether or not to have a fair trial
this country is beyond f***ed
I cannot believe how transparent about this they are. they're changing rules only for him. at least hide it if you're going to be corrupt like this lmao
relevant:
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1223356793805398018But they call her a coward for not playing their bullshit game.