Woah you use it for anxiety? Interesting, I actually don’t know if I’ve come across anyone using for that
But nice your name makes more sense then lol
Yeah docs come up with wild ideas for off label prescriptions
Republicans can smear her, and she already has a lot of neoliberal democrats against her
Sure, some establishment folk hate her, but most Americans don’t give a f*** about her, she’s really not that big of a name. Her only issue is foreign military policy in which she advocates pacifism which is wildly popular and has bipartisan support in America right now. How can republicans slander her for hanging out with Assad when trump hangs out with Kim jong un.
Yeah docs come up with wild ideas for off label prescriptions
Damn you musta gone through a bunch of other meds before they landed on gabapentin. But I’m happy you found something that worked
And it’s helpful to know that gabapentin can work for anxiety
Bro libs despise her and think she’s a Russian plant and Assad apologist thanks to constant MSM s***talking.
And republicans need scant evidence to call anyone left of Paul Ryan a socialist. Sure they think she’s cute and less crazy than most Democrats but lol at thinking they don’t still consider her a radical leftist for her views on Medicare for all, abortion, immigration and gun control no matter how many times she goes on Tucker and Breitbart. The “she’s the only Democrat I would vote for” stuff is just posturing to troll the libs. They’re still going to pull the slot for Trump in November. I personally quite like her but even if the neolib MSM swallowed their pride and began calling her (and Bernard) the greatest thing since sliced bread she will not turn out the base or flip a significant number of conservatives.
Liberal means progressive. That’s the definition of the word. You’re distorting definitions. The term neoliberal is linguistically derived from the market definition of liberal (liberal as in free, unregulated markets) same as libertarianism. Neoliberalism is not a term that is derived from the political definition of liberal (progressive).
Trump has one of the lowest approval ratings on record. His approval rating is consistently lower than his 2016 popular vote %. That entire gap is voters who are up for grabs and Tusli is the best Vp candidate to win them
idk what kind of f***ed up view you have to have to think liberal = progressive
liz voter logic, i suppose.
Sure, some establishment folk hate her, but most Americans don’t give a f*** about her, she’s really not that big of a name. Her only issue is foreign military policy in which she advocates pacifism which is wildly popular and has bipartisan support in America right now. How can republicans slander her for hanging out with Assad when trump hangs out with Kim jong un.
Cause when trump hangs out with rocket man, he tells the people that he’s bullied him into submission, whereas they can say she’s outright supporting Assad. That being said, i think she would make a decent Vice President either way
Liberal means progressive. That’s the definition of the word. You’re distorting definitions. The term neoliberal is linguistically derived from the market definition of liberal (liberal as in free, unregulated markets) same as libertarianism. Neoliberalism is not a term that is derived from the political definition of liberal (progressive).
Trump has one of the lowest approval ratings on record. His approval rating is consistently lower than his 2016 popular vote %. That entire gap is voters who are up for grabs and Tusli is the best Vp candidate to win them
Neoliberalism =/= liberalism, but most liberals are foreign policy neoliberals if you get what I mean
Neoliberalism =/= liberalism, but most liberals are foreign policy neoliberals if you get what I mean
I get what you mean, but everyone on this website is using those words interchangeably and it contradicts posts. 51% of democratic voters identify as liberal (for the first time since records started). The rest identify as moderate or conservative. If you add Bernie and Liz in polls that makes up most of that 51%. According to that spectrum, bernies the liberal candidate and all Bernie voters are liberal. If you don’t want to be called liberal, which just means progressive, than I have no idea what else you would identify as. Demsoc falls under the liberal tree. The vast majority of Americans oppose foreign military intervention and foreign trade right now. It would be a conspiracy theory to say liberals are warhawks just because some establishment dems (mostly not liberals) maybe have old school foreign policy ideals and vested interests in imperialism
I get what you mean, but everyone on this website is using those words interchangeably and it contradicts posts. 51% of democratic voters identify as liberal (for the first time since records started). The rest identify as moderate or conservative. If you add Bernie and Liz in polls that makes up most of that 51%. According to that spectrum, bernies the liberal candidate and all Bernie voters are liberal. If you don’t want to be called liberal, which just means progressive, than I have no idea what else you would identify as. Demsoc falls under the liberal tree. The vast majority of Americans oppose foreign military intervention and foreign trade right now. It would be a conspiracy theory to say liberals are warhawks just because some establishment dems (mostly not liberals) maybe have old school foreign policy ideals and vested interests in imperialism
democratic socialism is not liberal lmao
dem soc = completely replacing the capitalist economic system
liberal = not that.
I get what you mean, but everyone on this website is using those words interchangeably and it contradicts posts. 51% of democratic voters identify as liberal (for the first time since records started). The rest identify as moderate or conservative. If you add Bernie and Liz in polls that makes up most of that 51%. According to that spectrum, bernies the liberal candidate and all Bernie voters are liberal. If you don’t want to be called liberal, which just means progressive, than I have no idea what else you would identify as. Demsoc falls under the liberal tree. The vast majority of Americans oppose foreign military intervention and foreign trade right now. It would be a conspiracy theory to say liberals are warhawks just because some establishment dems (mostly not liberals) maybe have old school foreign policy ideals and vested interests in imperialism
Yeah when I first came on here I too was confused because the way niggas use the term “liberal” in socialist contexts like here isn’t the same as in regular American conversation. But there is a very large overlap between liberals and economic neoliberals that it can still be used almost interchangeably. For example, Obama ran on a somewhat progressive liberal platform and a lot of republicans accused him of socialism, but when it came to foreign policy, he was a neoliberal like the rest of the democrat establishment who also just call themselves regular liberals
democratic socialism is not liberal lmao
dem soc = completely replacing the capitalist economic system
liberal = not that.
That’s incorrect. Liberal is a broad term in American politics that encompasses everything left of moderate on the political spectrum. Demsoc would be a subcategory
That’s incorrect. Liberal is a broad term in American politics that encompasses everything left of moderate on the political spectrum. Demsoc would be a subcategory
words have meaning lmao.
idk what kind of f***ed up view you have to have to think liberal = progressive
liz voter logic, i suppose.
You’re smarter than this man cmon
I get what you mean, but everyone on this website is using those words interchangeably and it contradicts posts. 51% of democratic voters identify as liberal (for the first time since records started). The rest identify as moderate or conservative. If you add Bernie and Liz in polls that makes up most of that 51%. According to that spectrum, bernies the liberal candidate and all Bernie voters are liberal. If you don’t want to be called liberal, which just means progressive, than I have no idea what else you would identify as. Demsoc falls under the liberal tree. The vast majority of Americans oppose foreign military intervention and foreign trade right now. It would be a conspiracy theory to say liberals are warhawks just because some establishment dems (mostly not liberals) maybe have old school foreign policy ideals and vested interests in imperialism
Demsoc falls under the left tree. Liberals believe in more open markets for companies that demsocs often do not. Some people who call themselves liberals are actually progressives and some people who call themselves on the left are actually centrist liberals
liberal ideology goes hand in hand with capitalism
you cannot be a democratic socialist and be for capitalism
has the term dem socialist been b******ized in america? yes. but it doesn't change the fact this is a defined ideology
The amount of arguments I see on here about semantics is straight r e t a r d e d.
That’s incorrect. Liberal is a broad term in American politics that encompasses everything left of moderate on the political spectrum. Demsoc would be a subcategory
By definition liberalism is a right wing ideology
liberal ideology goes hand in hand with capitalism
you cannot be a democratic socialist and be for capitalism
has the term dem socialist been b******ized in america? yes. but it doesn't change the fact this is a defined ideology
Again distorting the classical definition of liberalism with the American political b******ization which simply means progressive or left of moderate, encompassing whatever sub identities people use such as demsoc, which is just increasing regulation and intervention in what is still largely privatized economic system.
If liberal meant supporter free markets then it encompasses all republicans and moderate democrat, which obviously isn’t the American political definition
By definition liberalism is a right wing ideology
that’s not how the terms used in American politics. 150 years ago dems and republicans changed labels. Liberal is just another distorted arbitrary label for a part of the American political spectrum
The amount of arguments I see on here about semantics is straight r e t a r d e d.
It’s important to have when I can’t understand half the posts in this section because people use neoliberal 7 times a paragraph without knowing what it means
Again distorting the classical definition of liberalism with the American political b******ization which simply means progressive or left of moderate, encompassing whatever sub identities people use such as demsoc, which is just increasing regulation and intervention in what is still largely privatized economic system.
If liberal meant supporter free markets then it encompasses all republicans and moderate democrat, which obviously isn’t the American political definition
you are typing a lot but not really saying anything lol. but yes, republicans are liberals. democrats are liberals, and moderates are liberals. markets and free trade are not promoted by democratic socialism. they are a key component to liberalism. this is really just not difficult to understand at all
that’s not how the terms used in American politics. 150 years ago dems and republicans changed labels. Liberal is just another distorted arbitrary label for a part of the American political spectrum
Yeah by Republicans. 3/4ths of the squad and bernie would not call themselves liberal lol
It’s important to have when I can’t understand half the posts in this section because people use neoliberal 7 times a paragraph without knowing what it means
Their language is built into their radical worldview. If you don’t share their worldview, you won’t share their language. There’s no compromise.