GONE

6y

They will provide "epic" movies like Endgame or San Andreas

garbage CG movies that just follow an extremely surface level narrative and dont give a single s*** about detail or world building

Endgame’s main selling point is using ten years of worldbuilding tho

Nozuka

6y

It’s pretty weird that people can’t like both

MCU movies and those “real cinema” movies are both equally great to me

GIO GIO

6y

Although I agree with some of what you said, we've already started to see a decent amount of films coming to Netflix where they clearly didn't care about how commercial it would be. Mank, I'm thinking of ending things, The Irishman and others have all been focused more on the art than the marketability.

Seems like Netflix goes to directors and says, it doesn't matter how this would do in the box office since it's going straight to streaming, make whatever you want. And we're getting some interesting stuff. Disney's just fixated on making s***ty CGI blockbusters cause that's what their audience wants and it works for them

I think streaming can be good in that good directors can make interesting s*** when they don't have to care about box office numbers. But it does depend on the willingness of the streaming providers. Netflix has been good about it so far

Rosebud

6y

I already feel Mank is Finchers worst film yet and Roma was also Cuarons worst film yet. It feels more like Netflix is giving a blank check for these filmmakers to make movies that studios back in the day didn’t let them do for good reason.

I will say The Irishman is great but it’s coming from a filmmaker who is far beyond his years and really of a dying breed in Hollywood. Also I don’t consider any of what you named to be blockbuster art. The blockbusters these streaming companies are green lighting sound absolutely awful. I already think WW84 looks horrendous but we’ve already seen Bright and how f***ing bad that is. And then ofc the LOTR series from Amazon looks dead on arrival after the JA Bayona hire

FREE

6y

Nigga never seen Alien 3

Rosebud

6y

tbh I’d take alien 3 over 2 hours of a filmmaker being bitter that Orson Welles s***s on him

Kalmanta

6y

Waiting for Nolan to get dragged again....
He really seems to worry about the small people in the industry, I don’t get how people can’t see that

Nozuka

6y

MCU hate

Y’all clowns. Go see ur indie movie snoozefests

GIO GIO

6y

Although I agree with some of what you said, we've already started to see a decent amount of films coming to Netflix where they clearly didn't care about how commercial it would be. Mank, I'm thinking of ending things, The Irishman and others have all been focused more on the art than the marketability.

Seems like Netflix goes to directors and says, it doesn't matter how this would do in the box office since it's going straight to streaming, make whatever you want. And we're getting some interesting stuff. Disney's just fixated on making s***ty CGI blockbusters cause that's what their audience wants and it works for them

I think streaming can be good in that good directors can make interesting s*** when they don't have to care about box office numbers. But it does depend on the willingness of the streaming providers. Netflix has been good about it so far

Rosebud

6y

I already feel Mank is Finchers worst film yet and Roma was also Cuarons worst film yet. It feels more like Netflix is giving a blank check for these filmmakers to make movies that studios back in the day didn’t let them do for good reason.

I will say The Irishman is great but it’s coming from a filmmaker who is far beyond his years and really of a dying breed in Hollywood. Also I don’t consider any of what you named to be blockbuster art. The blockbusters these streaming companies are green lighting sound absolutely awful. I already think WW84 looks horrendous but we’ve already seen Bright and how f***ing bad that is. And then ofc the LOTR series from Amazon looks dead on arrival after the JA Bayona hire

GIO GIO

6y

That's fair. I admittedly haven't seen Mank yet, but it was more about how in the streaming era these studios are still capable of making films that aren't produced with the sole interest of widespread appeal and making a billion dollars. These streaming services are looking for a wide verity of content and that includes movies that aren't necessarily blockbuster action type films. I think that in the streaming era there's great (if not more) incentive to make good quality films over blockbusters given that ticket sales don't matter. Blockbuster art films are probably taking the biggest hit due to streaming though which you mentioned

Regardless of how good Mank actually is, it's target audience clearly isn't the average American. Maybe they need to watch more carefully exactly what they're greenlighting (I wasn't a big fan of Roma either although it looked nice) and find a balance between strange passion project of a popular filmmaker and whatever the f*** disney is doing

orangetcovid

6y

Yea the hate for MCU kinda cringe. They gave their all for that universe

Oscar Winner

6y

Niggas in here using 200 words just to say “MCU trash, first 10 min of LOTR s***s on it”

MrIndigo96

6y

I like both the MCU/Disney and WB properties.
However I go to them for totally different. things

orangetcovid

6y

Like s*** like MCU and more artistic s*** can be both likeable

Oscar Winner

6y

Ima check out the LOTR trilogy see what bruh hyping. I heard it’s great, not doubting it but I’ve seen bruh name that movie a bunch like it’s the greatest blockbuster of all time

MichaelScotch24

6y

Imagine choosing to watch Uncut Gems for the first time at home