i get what you're saying op.
if yall are f***ing with protection there obviously a mutual agreement to prevent a child.
if the girl gets knocked up and develops an emotional attachment, she suddenly has full authority to forgo that agreement without the goodwill or consent of the father.
the father now has the full burden of another human being on the whim on another persons emotions
but yeah, the title automatically paints your argument in a bad light
Yes. I know many people that had a mutual agreement of not having a kid at the current time, s*** changes when they feel that bump in the womb and well even if you get s*** in writing lmao there ain't nothing you can do about that.
u forced urself into fatherhood fckin a b**** raw u stupid little boy i hope everything u against happens to u so u learn
Okay now that you said that, tell me how that will make two nurturing loving parents.
Okay now that you said that, tell me how that will make two nurturing loving parents.
it might not
ever heard of proper co-parenting from 2 homes? millions in the US do it and it works a large % of the time, clearly otherwise most Gen Z and millennials would be braindead useless, no?
sure coparenting is not the best option but u tryna dip out???? how is that better LMFAO just raise the kid emotionally, financinally or both, that or stop f***in b****es raw
it wouldn't be "deadbeat" because in this circumstance, it would be the mother knowing and allowing the situation of a fatherless child.
I feel like your whole argument stands on just ignoring or downplaying how big of an advantage that choice is for a specific gender though.
A 16 year old girl who made a mistake can still salvage her adult life if she wants and go on to become educated and flourish. A 16 year old boy who made a mistake will have to get a s***ty job and waste the next 20 years of his life at that spot.
I mean I don't agree with OP but you can't just wave away this discrepancy as if it's not something that deserves to be discussed lol
The woman gets that “advantage” because she’s the only person who can get pregnant. This makes it fair
it wouldn't be "deadbeat" because in this circumstance, it would be the mother knowing and allowing the situation of a fatherless child.
No sane man or woman would ever agree to that.
The woman gets that “advantage” because she’s the only person who can get pregnant. This makes it fair
Well the woman has the ability to not be pregnant anymore. At the price of a medical procedure and a few days for recovery, the woman essentially has control over the next 20 years if her life.
The fact that this bargain isn’t available to a specific gender is the problem here.
No sane man or woman would ever agree to that.
turns out they do very often?
turns out they do very often?
I absolutely believe people do. Just not sane people.
Which the woman chose to have happen ✍️✍️✍️
Yes
But that is totally irrelevant to whether or not the man has no accountability for his actions
IF YOU CAN KILL THIS MOTHERFUCKER
I CAN AT LEAST ABANDON ‘EM
IT’S MY MONEY, MY CHOICE
AND IF I’M WRONG
THEN PERHAPS WE’RE WRONG

do you know how many kids suffered because people think this exact same thing?
It's a childish and cowardly mentality tbh
The woman gets that “advantage” because she’s the only person who can get pregnant. This makes it fair
Her body her choice and her baby
It's a childish and cowardly mentality tbh
it only happens because the mother allows it to?
assuming she knows the father is not agreeing to a change in the original agreement, the mother is forcing it onto him.
the you nutted in her argument is bullshit. there was a mutual agreement for use of contraception, for a reason.
therefore, she would be responsible for bringing a child into a fatherless life. why are you absolving the mother of any responsibility?
In my opinion, it takes two to make a child. If early in the pregnancy a man asks you to have an abortion, and you refuse, you're acknowledging he wanted nothing to do with the kid early and still choosing to go through with it. That's not on him.
I say this because in the same vain, if a woman is the one in the relationship that decides she isn't ready and gets an abortion there is nothing seen as wrong there. Would y'all agree?
it only happens because the mother allows it to?
assuming she knows the father is not agreeing to a change in the original agreement, the mother is forcing it onto him.
the you nutted in her argument is bullshit. there was a mutual agreement for use of contraception, for a reason.
therefore, she would be responsible for bringing a child into a fatherless life. why are you absolving the mother of any responsibility?
Imo the mother is irresponsible for bringing a child into this world knowing that the father won't take care of his child bc he won't take responsibility for his actions bc he's too much of a coward
Doesn't mean the father isn't a coward still
Imo the mother is irresponsible for bringing a child into this world knowing that the father won't take care of his child bc he won't take responsibility for his actions bc he's too much of a coward
Doesn't mean the father isn't a coward still
a coward for not wanting what they both agreed they didn't want..?
a coward for not wanting what they both agreed they didn't want..?
Yes
If you bring a child into this world you're responsible for it period, whether you wanted it or not
so you’re telling me it’s fine for you to abandon an entire child that needs nurturing by both parents? you decided to nut in someone and get her pregnant it takes two to tango.
Well the woman has the ability to not be pregnant anymore. At the price of a medical procedure and a few days for recovery, the woman essentially has control over the next 20 years if her life.
The fact that this bargain isn’t available to a specific gender is the problem here.
And once again, the reason why that bargain isn’t available is because it can’t be.
Cis-men can’t get pregnant
The logic makes sense but this is a scenario where you have to swallow your pride & take care of a new life that his a lineage of yourself
But yes it can be wildly irresponsible for the mother depending on the scenario
Yes
If you bring a child into this world you're responsible for it period, whether you wanted it or not
but the father isn't bringing it, the mother is lol..