Jan 10, 2020·1 reply
EnpaxNah, they probably should. It makes mutually assured destruction more effective at preventing conflicts
i agree with you but sometimes im afraid that my deluded president will just decide to go out with a bang and use it, mans crazy fr
- Jan 10, 2020RoomOnFire
i agree with you but sometimes im afraid that my deluded president will just decide to go out with a bang and use it, mans crazy fr
I don’t think any country should have nuclear weapons honestly, but at the same time, they have really decreased the number and scale of wars that humanity goes through so idk
Jan 10, 2020NiceLikeChristwhataboutism...a classic soviet tactic
and yours is hypocrisy
OPJan 10, 2020Maybe Iran will nuke themselves by accident if we let them continue development of nuclear weapons
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyNiceLikeChrist
Their leader is special ed and unlike our country there aren't ways to control him. Pretty sure there isn't a single soul in South Korea who would be okay with NK having nukes.
if you believe that Kim is special ed, you're more brainwashed than North koreans.
Jan 10, 2020·1 replyVersettiif you believe that Kim is special ed, you're more brainwashed than North koreans.
Maybe he's not special ed, but he's one of those people who really needed a good ass whooping at some point while growing up to give him perspective and humility, and I don't think that happened
- Jan 10, 2020·2 repliesAstronaut
Maybe he's not special ed, but he's one of those people who really needed a good ass whooping at some point while growing up to give him perspective and humility, and I don't think that happened
think about what kind of generational trauma, perspective, humility, etc. getting bombed to s*** by the united states gave the koreans.
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyVersetti
think about what kind of generational trauma, perspective, humility, etc. getting bombed to s*** by the united states gave the koreans.
Kim was born in the 80s and educated in the west, he went through none of that
Jan 10, 2020·1 replyEnpaxKim was born in the 80s and educated in the west, he went through none of that
he did say generational trauma ...
- Jan 10, 2020
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyDickerSpaniel
he did say generational trauma ...
Generational trauma would affect most of them yeah, but Kim is part of a group that lives an exceptionally well off life compared to the common folk. Him making weirdo threats all the time is just annoying
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyEnpax
Generational trauma would affect most of them yeah, but Kim is part of a group that lives an exceptionally well off life compared to the common folk. Him making weirdo threats all the time is just annoying
i’m not saying nothing either way i just think you can’t discount a world leader of a country that underwent such a thing(s) on their own soil relatively recently, that their world leader would represent sentiments against that/those, regardless how well off he is. i think it’s fair to use the term or at least consider him a reflection of that
- Jan 10, 2020Versetti
think about what kind of generational trauma, perspective, humility, etc. getting bombed to s*** by the united states gave the koreans.
The country's sour relationship with the US is understandable. I was referring to his God complex and how whipped/indoctrinated his populace is.
- Jan 10, 2020DickerSpaniel
i’m not saying nothing either way i just think you can’t discount a world leader of a country that underwent such a thing(s) on their own soil relatively recently, that their world leader would represent sentiments against that/those, regardless how well off he is. i think it’s fair to use the term or at least consider him a reflection of that
I think it’s fair for North Korea in general to not trust the US given their past animosity and bombing campaign, but what I’m saying is Kim is provoking conflict with his threats (not rn necessarily, more like a few years ago). Even China is getting tired of it, and they’re supposed to be his best friends
Jan 10, 2020·1 replyNiceLikeChristSome countries cannot be trusted with nukes. Nearly all of the nutass middle east and north korea for starters should never be in possession of nukes.
No one should tbh. But if the US can have them others can too
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyY0rn
No one should tbh. But if the US can have them others can too
MAD is the reason we haven't had a third world War already. I'm sure it's also the chief reason the US is still being cucked by Saudi Arabia. Otherwise we would've been gone in to provide death in exchange for their oil.
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyEnpax
You guys criticize America for aiding rebels in Syria against a previously established government, while Russia drone striking civilians and rebels to help a regime that gassed them is ok, meanwhile you also hate America for helping the Saudis keep an established government in power in Yemen by drone striking civilians and rebels backed by Iran. Then you’ll say “I never said I liked Russia or Iran” despite conveniently taking their side at every turn, instead of just remaining neutral against undefendable countries
Its no competition of whos the s***tiest country. Only see one person backing Russia while all the others 'hate on' the USA and Russia for their bullshit
- Jan 10, 2020·1 replyAstronaut
MAD is the reason we haven't had a third world War already. I'm sure it's also the chief reason the US is still being cucked by Saudi Arabia. Otherwise we would've been gone in to provide death in exchange for their oil.
SA trash af but yeah i could see yall do that. Yall really love f***ing up people coz of oil
- Jan 10, 2020
Not that it'd ever actually happen, but I say give most/all countries nukes and let's see if humans can find a cure for greed/stupidity with our feet held to the fire
- Jan 10, 2020·2 repliesY0rn
Its no competition of whos the s***tiest country. Only see one person backing Russia while all the others 'hate on' the USA and Russia for their bullshit
Most socialists on this site try to downplay any abuses America’s enemies commit. America should absolutely be criticized for its destabilizing conduct, but that doesn’t mean they should side with Iran and Russia instead
- Jan 10, 2020Y0rn
SA trash af but yeah i could see yall do that. Yall really love f***ing up people coz of oil
That and racism are our national past times tbh
- Jan 10, 2020Enpax
Most socialists on this site try to downplay any abuses America’s enemies commit. America should absolutely be criticized for its destabilizing conduct, but that doesn’t mean they should side with Iran and Russia instead
I agree with you on that
- Jan 10, 2020Astronaut
When do we adopt that same energy for Saudi Arabia?
I been had it tbh idk what the f*** is wrong with our govt
- OPJan 10, 2020·1 reply
Jan 10, 2020·1 replysince when was there a politics section??