https://www.groupon.com/deals/vividseats-tyler-the-creator-22
Where is the price
Not seeing $15
Lmao okay?
90%-95% of people that go see an artist live (at their show, not at a festival) are fans of that artist. I don’t know what this little anecdote was supposed to prove lmao
Where'd you get 90%-95% from? Gimme ya source since yall being so specific about s***.
Where'd you get 90%-95% from? Gimme ya source since yall being so specific about s***.
It’s called common sense
Most people who go to basketball games are fans of basketball, it’s not hard to assume that most people who pay money to go see an artist live are fans of that artist
This nigga gotta be under 20 there’s no way a grown adult doesn’t understand how important touring is for artists
It’s called common sense
Most people who go to basketball games are fans of basketball, it’s not hard to assume that most people who pay money to go see an artist live are fans of that artist
So just liking basketball in general
Like music fans go to music shows in general as a night out? Glad you agree king
So just liking basketball in general
Like music fans go to music shows in general as a night out? Glad you agree king
No, basketball fans who go to basketball games go to see teams/players that they like
That’s why you won’t see a Pistons vs. Magic game sold out
Judging how big an artist is based on how much money the fans throw at them is the dumbest s*** ever.
BTS must be the biggest artists to ever exist then
Judging an artist's popularity by people being willing to spend money on them is the dumbest s*** ever?
That's exactly what album sales are too tho
Judging an artist's popularity by people being willing to spend money on them is the dumbest s*** ever?
That's exactly what album sales are too tho
Albums are $10
Streaming is $10
Ticket = $15(meek)-$500+
On that note I'm outta here
Albums are $10
Streaming is $10
Ticket = $15(meek)-$500+
On that note I'm outta here
Exactly, so if more people are willing to spend a more expensive fee to see an artist, that artist is bigger
Also, streaming is so easy to do it’s so easy to just passively stream something, more streams doesn’t always equate to the artist being bigger
Exactly, so if more people are willing to spend a more expensive fee to see an artist, that artist is bigger
Also, streaming is so easy to do it’s so easy to just passively stream something, more streams doesn’t always equate to the artist being bigger
So MJ was never the biggest artist of any decade since the Pink Floyd tour outsold his
Albums are $10
Streaming is $10
Ticket = $15(meek)-$500+
On that note I'm outta here
the artist is going to get a penny from that $10 a person's paying for his entire streaming service
So MJ was never the biggest artist of any decade since the Pink Floyd tour outsold his
Its not a black and white argument like either of u are making it but touring is definitely a factor to look at that makes an artist big
There can be a popular artist who doesnt tour as well
But if an artist is touring well that likely means they have a base
Its not a black and white argument like either of u are making it but touring is definitely a factor to look at that makes an artist big
There can be a popular artist who doesnt tour as well
But if an artist is touring well that likely means they have a base
Goalposts moved. Just took some MJ disrespect lol
tyler puts hella effort into his performances maybe be will inclined to spend more if they tried ie stop rapping with backtracking
So MJ was never the biggest artist of any decade since the Pink Floyd tour outsold his
Bro, the average attendance of MJ’s tour was 36,000 people, while Pink Floyd’s was 27,000.
MJ’s tour sold $125 million, Pink Floyd’s sold $135 million.
But MJ only did 123 shows, Pink Floyd did 197.
So even though Pink Floyd sold $10 million more, they did 74 more shows to get that, and they had an average of 9K less people per show
Exactly, so if more people are willing to spend a more expensive fee to see an artist, that artist is bigger
Also, streaming is so easy to do it’s so easy to just passively stream something, more streams doesn’t always equate to the artist being bigger
Lmaoooooo
Bruh said streaming is cheap but tour tickets are expensive like it helped his argument
Bro, the average attendance of MJ’s tour was 36,000 people, while Pink Floyd’s was 27,000.
MJ’s tour sold $125 million, Pink Floyd’s sold $135 million.
But MJ only did 123 shows, Pink Floyd did 197.
So even though Pink Floyd sold $10 million more, they did 74 more shows to get that, and they had an average of 9K less people per show
MJ isn't a top 20 biggest artist according to you lil bro he didn't move enough tickets. Top 5 biggest of all time:
Ed Sheeran
U2
Guns N’ Roses
The Rolling Stones
Coldplay
Exactly, so if more people are willing to spend a more expensive fee to see an artist, that artist is bigger
Also, streaming is so easy to do it’s so easy to just passively stream something, more streams doesn’t always equate to the artist being bigger
This part isn’t true at all. You can have fans that can’t afford or too young etc to go to shows. But they can be the biggest fan of your music
MJ isn't a top 20 biggest artist according to you lil bro he didn't move enough tickets. Top 5 biggest of all time:
Ed Sheeran
U2
Guns N’ Roses
The Rolling Stones
Coldplay
Man doesn’t understand what context is
This part isn’t true at all. You can have fans that can’t afford or too young etc to go to shows. But they can be the biggest fan of your music
There’s no age requirement at shows, and yes some can’t afford it but the biggest artists are still able to sell out venues. There isn’t one big artist in the history of music who went their whole career unable to sell out shows