daemon

4y

Bro, I don't think she was ever even shot

soapmanwun

4y

what type of kangaroo court ass s*** is this

Thizzer

4y

You can think that but she was shot at, a. Gun was shot in her direction this much is true and o deny it would be deny reality

daemon

4y

Getting shot at and getting shot are too completely different things.

Mind you she said she was shot in BOTH her feet and needed surgery to get the bullets removed. However, She initially told officers she stepped on glass, that was her official statement to the police. Its turning out to be a blatant lie.

She was never shot.

Bandito

4y

• If your first statement was a lie nothing you say can be trusted!
• If the hospital says the wounds were superficial have you been shot?
• if the detectives say they have no idea where or have not seen bullet fragments have you been shot.
• if someone says dance b**** to someone always twerking on the gram does that mean he shot you.

Bandito

4y

• If your first statement was a lie nothing you say can be trusted!
• If the hospital says the wounds were superficial have you been shot?
• if the detectives say they have no idea where or have not seen bullet fragments have you been shot.
• if someone says dance b**** to someone always twerking on the gram does that mean he shot you.

soapmanwun

4y

what type of kangaroo court ass s*** is this

Carl Sweatpants

4y

What does kangaroo court mean

blonded

4y

as far as i know it's an unofficial court of peers so i'm confused how what they said was a kangaroo court

daemon

4y

Getting shot at and getting shot are too completely different things.

Mind you she said she was shot in BOTH her feet and needed surgery to get the bullets removed. However, She initially told officers she stepped on glass, that was her official statement to the police. Its turning out to be a blatant lie.

She was never shot.

Bandito

4y

What we know:

• a gun was fired.
• a window was broken.
• someone said they stepped on glass
• someone said they were shot.
• conflicting reports from the victim.
• lack of and missing evidence to corroborate said story.

The real question is what created those injuries and what broke the glass?

Based on height if a bullet broke the window you would be shot in upper body instead of the foot. Opening the door would then cause the glass to fall on the ground which the alleged victim would then step in while exiting the vehicle.

Additionally, said victim also got back into the car with the alleged shooter which goes against the natural human instinct of flight in dangerous situations as her rentering the car is proven by the fact that they were not arrested at the scene of the shooting.

Thizzer

4y

So someone shot at her, Which makes none of this better

Bandito

4y

Not capping for Tory because f*** him if he did it. But a gun firing does not mean you were shot at. Accidental firings happen all the time. We don’t know the exact scenario how the gun was pulled:

• was there a struggle for the gun which caused it to fire?
• who actually fired the gun?
• what is the sensitivity of the trigger?
• the gun is allegedly owned by the security guard how would the shooter get a hold of someone else’s firearm?

There’s a lot of unanswered questions surrounding the gun.

Let’s assume the window was broken by the bullet and the alleged shooter is confirmed to be in the passenger front seat and the victim was behind them. If you were the shooter how would you aim at the back passenger window directly behind you. While I’m not a trajectory expert that seems difficult to execute. That’s why I think the case rides on the broken window and what broke it as it may have caused the injuries.

The second part of the case is proven who fired the gun as that person will still face charges for carrying a gun and discharging it in LA. However, if the gun is owned by the security it is probably licensed.

bigbelts

4y

Whoever shot fired 4 times. That's not an accident lol also, there hasn't been any thing to indicate the shots were fired at someone in in the car. All 4 shell casings were found outside.

As far as the gun goes, there isn't anything to say that the unregistered wasn't his. Iirc they found it on him, that's why they charged him with it to begin

Bandito

4y

Not capping for Tory because f*** him if he did it. But a gun firing does not mean you were shot at. Accidental firings happen all the time. We don’t know the exact scenario how the gun was pulled:

• was there a struggle for the gun which caused it to fire?
• who actually fired the gun?
• what is the sensitivity of the trigger?
• the gun is allegedly owned by the security guard how would the shooter get a hold of someone else’s firearm?

There’s a lot of unanswered questions surrounding the gun.

Let’s assume the window was broken by the bullet and the alleged shooter is confirmed to be in the passenger front seat and the victim was behind them. If you were the shooter how would you aim at the back passenger window directly behind you. While I’m not a trajectory expert that seems difficult to execute. That’s why I think the case rides on the broken window and what broke it as it may have caused the injuries.

The second part of the case is proven who fired the gun as that person will still face charges for carrying a gun and discharging it in LA. However, if the gun is owned by the security it is probably licensed.

bigbelts

4y

How can you be sure she wasn't shot?

Steak

4y

This s*** should be televised