I want y’all to understand that gag orders are issued to encourage fair trials. Everyone on the internet has their opinion on this case and what you need to understand is that the evidence is not circumstantial, a gun was fired at her, she was injured. The evidence points to Tory firing the weapon which is what the investigation is for. This is a high profile case, until there’s a discovery released on this entire trial you will not know what evidence has been submitted, how it was examined and all other documents submitted in the case.
?? all it takes is a simple google search for the updates on the case.
I did google it and I’ve only found things stating that residue was on his hands. It would be 2 seconds to provide a link but here we are
where does it say there was residue on the friends hands? I cannot find it (genuinely asking)
"Today in court it was revealed that an independent witness reported to the LAPD that he observed a fight break out between the two women in the car, just prior to the shooting," the statement reads. "Megan herself corroborated this account, telling officers shortly after the incident that the argument was between her and the other female passenger in the car."
The statement added, "The independent witness also told officers that the muzzle flash was closest to the other female, which is corroborated by the gunshot residue found on the other female’s hands. It was further established that Megan gave several inconsistent accounts of what happened that night and that she omitted key information to the police. We look forward to the opportunity to cross examine her at trial about the numerous inconsistencies in her story."
?? all it takes is a simple google search for the updates on the case.
where does it say that?
I want y’all to understand that gag orders are issued to encourage fair trials. Everyone on the internet has their opinion on this case and what you need to understand is that the evidence is not circumstantial, a gun was fired at her, she was injured. The evidence points to Tory firing the weapon which is what the investigation is for. This is a high profile case, until there’s a discovery released on this entire trial you will not know what evidence has been submitted, how it was examined and all other documents submitted in the case.
There's literally no evidence of her being shot. NONE. Just the words coming out of her mouth, apparently that's all the evidence people need.
She said on video, she had to get surgery to remove bullets from BOTH her feet. Why are the doctors saying they only treated her for superficial wounds (cuts, abrasions, lacerations) and never recovered any bullet fragments from her feet? Just answer this and how does this make sense to you.
where does it say that?
tmz.com/2021/12/15/meg-thee-stallion-tory-lanez-shooting-court-evidence-fight
All it takes is simple google search my man
I did google it and I’ve only found things stating that residue was on his hands. It would be 2 seconds to provide a link but here we are
So based on what this says, it’s basically insinuating the residue is on her hands from the muzzle blast. Going off what this literally says, she probably put her hands up because they were firing rounds. If she was sitting next to the shooter, this makes sense.
There's literally no evidence of her being shot. NONE. Just the words coming out of her mouth, apparently that's all the evidence people need.
She said on video, she had to get surgery to remove bullets from BOTH her feet. Why are the doctors saying they only treated her for superficial wounds (cuts, abrasions, lacerations) and never recovered any bullet fragments from her feet? Just answer this and how does this make sense to you.
Bro she was shot AT that’s what the investigation is for! They shot at her feet! It’s still assault with intent to harm!
"Today in court it was revealed that an independent witness reported to the LAPD that he observed a fight break out between the two women in the car, just prior to the shooting," the statement reads. "Megan herself corroborated this account, telling officers shortly after the incident that the argument was between her and the other female passenger in the car."
The statement added, "The independent witness also told officers that the muzzle flash was closest to the other female, which is corroborated by the gunshot residue found on the other female’s hands. It was further established that Megan gave several inconsistent accounts of what happened that night and that she omitted key information to the police. We look forward to the opportunity to cross examine her at trial about the numerous inconsistencies in her story."
https://www.xxlmag.com/tory-lanez-megan-thee-stallion-lawyer-defense/
thank you for this
Bro she was shot AT that’s what the investigation is for! They shot at her feet! It’s still assault with intent to harm!
Oh so now you're moving the goalpost.
You claimed she was SHOT. There's no evidence that she was SHOT.
Just admit you were wrong about this.
So based on what this says, it’s basically insinuating the residue is on her hands from the muzzle blast. Going off what this literally says, she probably put her hands up because they were firing rounds. If she was sitting next to the shooter, this makes sense.
The GSR evidence points to the friend being the shooter.
You're coming up with ridiculous scenarios to try to pin tory as the shooter, all the evidence says otherwise. Sad this is the world we living in, just view people fairly and support the truth
Oh so now you're moving the goalpost.
You claimed she was SHOT. There's no evidence that she was SHOT.
Just admit you were wrong about this.
I won’t admit I’m wrong about it because there’s nothing to admit. We literally will not know until the trial is over my dude and if you’re riding this hard for Tory f***ing lanez a man that doesn’t know you exist it’s pretty wild
again she was shot at, I said the evidence seems to point he fired the gun man
I’m not trying to argue with some rando on f***in KTT2 when neither of us were there and know what happened
I appreciate your opinion I’m sure in your mind it’s valid, but tone it down lmao
I won’t admit I’m wrong about it because there’s nothing to admit. We literally will not know until the trial is over my dude and if you’re riding this hard for Tory f***ing lanez a man that doesn’t know you exist it’s pretty wild
again she was shot at, I said the evidence seems to point he fired the gun man
I’m not trying to argue with some rando on f***in KTT2 when neither of us were there and know what happened
I appreciate your opinion I’m sure in your mind it’s valid, but tone it down lmao
checkmate
"Today in court it was revealed that an independent witness reported to the LAPD that he observed a fight break out between the two women in the car, just prior to the shooting," the statement reads. "Megan herself corroborated this account, telling officers shortly after the incident that the argument was between her and the other female passenger in the car."
The statement added, "The independent witness also told officers that the muzzle flash was closest to the other female, which is corroborated by the gunshot residue found on the other female’s hands. It was further established that Megan gave several inconsistent accounts of what happened that night and that she omitted key information to the police. We look forward to the opportunity to cross examine her at trial about the numerous inconsistencies in her story."
https://www.xxlmag.com/tory-lanez-megan-thee-stallion-lawyer-defense/
Wow shawty shot megan and she blamed it on tory, that’s what it sound like to me….
If you was drunk just say that…but if she lied her career gotta be over…
So based on what this says, it’s basically insinuating the residue is on her hands from the muzzle blast. Going off what this literally says, she probably put her hands up because they were firing rounds. If she was sitting next to the shooter, this makes sense.
Residue will go on everyone in close proximity especially in a confined space like a car (they were in). Gun residue alone is not enough to determine the shooter only that a shot was fired. If only Meg had ballistics to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt that could be used to trace back the trajectory to the shooters location from the point of entry.
I think your not looking at this objectivity because Tory is innocent until proven guilty and they're doing an awful job proving it. You don't have to cope for the defense because if Tory really is guilty they'll prove it. A big "if"
Wow shawty shot megan and she blamed it on tory, that’s what it sound like to me….
If you was drunk just say that…but if she lied her career gotta be over…
Yeah if didnt do it a lot of people are gonna be looking funny in the light
Residue will go on everyone in close proximity especially in a confined space like a car (they were in). Gun residue alone is not enough to determine the shooter only that a shot was fired. If only Meg had ballistics to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt that could be used to trace back the trajectory to the shooters location from the point of entry.
I think your not looking at this objectivity because Tory is innocent until proven guilty and they're doing an awful job proving it. You don't have to cope for the defense because if Tory really is guilty they'll prove it. A big "if"
hey man all I said in my post you just replied to, is that It makes sense people in close proximity would have residue on their hands
Innocent until proven guilty indeed
But y’all are real quick to just dismiss that a gun was fired and it was still fired at Megan
It’s so easy to dismiss that something did indeed happen and it sounds like “assault with a deadly weapon” to me
they’ve all got money they’ll figure out who really did it and in the grand scheme the court of public opinions on KTT2 will be null and void
hey man all I said in my post you just replied to, is that It makes sense people in close proximity would have residue on their hands
Yeah but I wanted to clarify just incase anyone reading doesn't understand ballistics and might make a big leap to judgement. I can only quote one of your posts but all of them seem to come off as finding Tory guilty instead of using all the facts to give him his fair chance.
To add on to everything you said in other posts is that Tory is innocent until this trial is over. I repeat Tory Lanez is innocent. We can all agree on that statement at least until evidence says otherwise. Someone going to court doesn't automatically warrant any suspicion on themselves. Didn't we all learn about cases like Ed Johnson in school?
Yeah but I wanted to clarify just incase anyone reading doesn't understand ballistics and might make a big leap to judgement. I can only quote one of your posts but all of them seem to come off as finding Tory guilty instead of using all the facts to give him his fair chance.
To add on to everything you said in other posts is that Tory is innocent until this trial is over. I repeat Tory Lanez is innocent. We can all agree on that statement at least until evidence says otherwise. Someone going to court doesn't automatically warrant any suspicion on themselves. Didn't we all learn about cases like Ed Johnson in school?
Imma just say OJ definitely wasn’t innocent but was found out to be that way by the courts
same with Casey Anthony
again wasn’t there won’t find out till the discovery and hearing findings what really happened regardless so until then I’m believing the victim bc nobody ever does esPECIALLY when it’s a black woman