Dec 19, 2021
DonutHoleyeah Im just saying that the loud minorities on twitter picking sides without any evidence should be the target imo, they're the ones
that ruined the discussion around this
Imo it shouldn't be "losers vs women" but "the people vs roc nation pr team" lolI can see some men having a field day with this case if tory is found innocent
especially if they have been set up irl before etc, yeah I can't fault a person who has been falsely accused to feel some type of way about this whole case - that feeling however shouldn't turn into a "women always lie" narrative, that's all I'm sayingYou know twitter & social media always goes to the extreme with everything. Theres no saying whats gonna happen.
Dec 19, 2021·1 reply
cilviademohlmfaooo you say that but rooting against a black woman for no reason, weirdo
What a stupid comment
Dec 19, 2021daemonOh she was shot. But by who is the question
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replySHAQUILLE
What a stupid comment
ok moron
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
ok moron
I’m a moron but you tryna use the black woman card for some online brownie points
- Dec 19, 2021·2 repliesSHAQUILLE
I’m a moron but you tryna use the black woman card for some online brownie points
I literally replied to a guy using that same card but for black men….try again
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replyOKLAMA Ace
I disagree
There was a active campaign against Tory. This was like BLM when everyone was getting blamed left and right for not ”protesting”. Except it was all on Tory this time.
To this day he’s cancelled on all DSP’s.
I know a guy in real life who was falsely accused by a woman and beat the case.
You dont think a high profile case like this is gonna make dudes like this hop out the woodworks and start explaining to the world how women ”set them up”, ”lied on them” ”falsely accused” etc. There are people sitting in jail behind this. Meg setting women back for album sales.
What u mean hes cancelled on all DSPs?
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
I literally replied to a guy using that same card but for black men….try again
Because there’s an actual agenda against black men online
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replySHAQUILLE
Because there’s an actual agenda against black men online
the fact you can’t see that it works both ways shows me where your mind is at
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
the fact you can’t see that it works both ways shows me where your mind is at
I’m not saying it doesn’t work both ways. I’m saying the anti tory Lanez stuff is clearly the anti black male agenda at work.
I’m not gonna give Megan that same grace when she’s out here using George Floyd and Breonna Taylor as ammo and complaining that the already biased media isn’t biased enough in her favor
Dec 19, 2021not really worth arguing with anyone tbh
If he’s guilty, then they’re just gonna say I told you so
If he’s innocent, Meg defenders are still gonna say you’re an loser/weirdo for internet points
- Dec 19, 2021SHAQUILLE
I’m not saying it doesn’t work both ways. I’m saying the anti tory Lanez stuff is clearly the anti black male agenda at work.
I’m not gonna give Megan that same grace when she’s out here using George Floyd and Breonna Taylor as ammo and complaining that the already biased media isn’t biased enough in her favor
I don’t disagree with your first statement, but you saying “there’s an actual agenda against black men” implies there isn’t one against black women, which clearly there is. there are plenty of dudes who have been against meg from the start just because she’s a woman.
Dec 19, 2021·2 repliesI mean if they can't find the bullet fragments shouldn't they have the X-Rays?
- Dec 19, 2021Swz3000
What u mean hes cancelled on all DSPs?
No playlisting + he’s shadowbanned
Dude dropped like 3 albums this year and none of them touched rapcaviar
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
I literally replied to a guy using that same card but for black men….try again
that's not what happened
that comment complained about how black men are presumed guilty until proven innocent
idk how stating that means someone is rooting against meg (a black woman)one can be for meg and still want to grant a person, tory (a black man) in this case the simple presumption of innocence he's entitled to
so anytime a black woman is accusing a person, the accused should give up their presumption of innonence??? are u dumb????
the complaint doesn't stem from wanting to protect tory, it stems from witnessing how this systematically happens to black men regardless if they're guilty or not, rich or poor, famous or nameless
if u'r not black don't bother responding and stfu forever about things u don't understand
Dec 19, 2021NullI mean if they can't find the bullet fragments shouldn't they have the X-Rays?
Assuming they ever existed (I dont)
You would think pictures and all that was taken
- Dec 19, 2021·2 repliesDonutHole
that's not what happened
that comment complained about how black men are presumed guilty until proven innocent
idk how stating that means someone is rooting against meg (a black woman)one can be for meg and still want to grant a person, tory (a black man) in this case the simple presumption of innocence he's entitled to
so anytime a black woman is accusing a person, the accused should give up their presumption of innonence??? are u dumb????
the complaint doesn't stem from wanting to protect tory, it stems from witnessing how this systematically happens to black men regardless if they're guilty or not, rich or poor, famous or nameless
if u'r not black don't bother responding and stfu forever about things u don't understand
except it does stem from wanting to defend tory, none of these people would be defending the random black man that shot meg in the foot. it’s because it’s tory they defend him. try again
- Dec 19, 2021Null
I mean if they can't find the bullet fragments shouldn't they have the X-Rays?
Hov money will make a doctor ignore common sense
- Dec 19, 2021
Tory did nothing wrong.
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
except it does stem from wanting to defend tory, none of these people would be defending the random black man that shot meg in the foot. it’s because it’s tory they defend him. try again
Ok and if someone wants to defend Tory, what’s the problem lmao? Dude hasn’t been proven guilty, you’re not making any sense
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replyCGodJr
Ok and if someone wants to defend Tory, what’s the problem lmao? Dude hasn’t been proven guilty, you’re not making any sense
I didn’t say they couldn’t defend him, but I can say my opinion on their defense regardless. innocent until proven guilty is a technicality (a good one) in the word of the law, not some thing that random humans have to live by if they don’t see it like that. I don’t see your point
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
except it does stem from wanting to defend tory, none of these people would be defending the random black man that shot meg in the foot. it’s because it’s tory they defend him. try again
Dec 19, 2021·1 replyIf the evidence is gone Wtf they going to do to prove he did it? And how tf is the evidence missing? Tf?
- Dec 19, 2021·1 replycilviademoh
I didn’t say they couldn’t defend him, but I can say my opinion on their defense regardless. innocent until proven guilty is a technicality (a good one) in the word of the law, not some thing that random humans have to live by if they don’t see it like that. I don’t see your point
That whole paragraph was nonsense. You were the one that originally said that anyone defending Tory is a weirdo/ “insert insult here” when he’s not guilty, you’re not making any sense at all.
