@CrimsonArk
Speak on this my guy
he’s prob gonna say expectations were higher for Bethesda
Deathloop was fun tbh just nowhere close to a 10, 8 at best
Nobody played wokeloop
Fallout as directed by Todd Howard's Bethesda game studios starting with fallout 3 (2008) followed by fallout 4 (2015) are awful
Rewriting history itt
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
One is an indie game the other is the biggest game of the year
Why yall talkn about New Vegas when that was Obsidian lol
only good fallout game
One is an indie game the other is the biggest game of the year
Correct, but you’re forgetting that people gauge that in their reviews, they reviewed starfield harsher because of that expectation and it still got 88
Same goes for sea of stars, it’s not supposed to be some huge AAA game so they don’t hold it to the same standard when giving it a score
Xbox got one
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
i gotta start frequenting here more often, i don’t even know the lore and tea in this sxn like that
only good fallout game
crazy how obsidian made the game in 18 months
crazy how obsidian made the game in 18 months
yeah but what wasnt crazy was how broken that game was
wait a second
WE ARE BACK!!

Correct, but you’re forgetting that people gauge that in their reviews, they reviewed starfield harsher because of that expectation and it still got 88
Same goes for sea of stars, it’s not supposed to be some huge AAA game so they don’t hold it to the same standard when giving it a score
Yes, Starfield was graded amongst its contemporaries as was Sea of Stars. That's how it should be.
Them Sea of Stars reviews probably what gave Sony the balls to increase PS plus prices tbh
Yes, Starfield was graded amongst its contemporaries as was Sea of Stars. That's how it should be.
Right. So 88 is impressive for both in different ways, my point stands. You can’t say sea of stars is a banger at 88 and criticize starfield at the same score, because they each individually got those scores relative to their contemporaries, not each other. You get me?
Hopefully they're not required or anything. I'd have no issue acting like they don't exist
It was never a selling point for me
NIGGAS WANTED A SPACE SIM 
YOU WANNA GO EXPLORE PLANETS GO DO A DMT BONG RIP 
When the blacklisted reviewers drop their reviews next week and tank the MC score to 75
Bethesda is BACK!!!
When the blacklisted reviewers drop their reviews next week and tank the MC score to 75
Fr
Right. So 88 is impressive for both in different ways, my point stands. You can’t say sea of stars is a banger at 88 and criticize starfield at the same score, because they each individually got those scores relative to their contemporaries, not each other. You get me?
I mean... idk about you but the general expectation amongst people was a 90+. It's MS biggest (and most important game, arguably) in over a decade.
When the blacklisted reviewers drop their reviews next week and tank the MC score to 75