Quote the fictional parts to me
look it up. youre basing your whole views of communism on it lmao so maybe do some research
So what do yall think of when u think of socialism
Theory? Countries that put it into practice? Small implementations of socialist based policy?
I'm in the U.S. so we have a limited history of it even being considered non-heresy to discuss in a positive light, at least as far as mid 20th century to now, but wondering what it means 2 u
obv unfettered capitalism aint it, as we can see from the disgusting wealth inequality and inefficiency as well as lack of better regulation on those who hoard the most
I’m trying to go against the narrative that socialism and communism is some kind of a happy umbrella solution to all the worlds problems, I take it personally because I’m a descendant of former eastern bloc countries, and I’ve been told from a young age in great detail the depth of the evil that unfolded there in the pursuit of utopian society
It frustrates me that the failures of Marxism are always levelled at those that were in power, not at the ideology itself. It’s a disgusting ideology that has no place in the world. It’s like saying Nazism was only bad because Hitler was the man in power and he did bad things but the idea behind it is good.
The ideas behind Marxism are rooted in resentment, suppression, envy and hate, all conveniently painted behind a pretty veneer of utopian fantasy
Many of the Eastern bloc countries preferred their conditions under communism.
Tons of polls done about this
Quote the fictional parts to me
Nah it isn't fiction. There're some questionable sources, but labeling everything as fiction is just asinine.
look it up. youre basing your whole views of communism on it lmao so maybe do some research
The majority of my views on communism are based on people I’ve spoken too in real life about it
Solzhenitsyn just summed it up well in one book
The majority of my views on communism are based on people I’ve spoken too in real life about it
Solzhenitsyn just summed it up well in one book
which book are you talking about
Many of the Eastern bloc countries preferred their conditions under communism.
Tons of polls done about this
I don’t blame them, at least there was some sense of security. Many of them were also born into that system so it was all they knew/what they were used to
Unfortunately now they’ve got to pick up the pieces
Gulag archipelago
so your understanding of communism is all from a critique of labor camps and authoritarianism - not the actual theories and ideas of socialism or communism
so your understanding of communism is all from a critique of labor camps and authoritarianism - not the actual theories and ideas of socialism or communism
I can tell you haven’t read it then
Capitalism is no better than communism if it’s corrupt and authoritarian, I’m not arguing with you here
so your understanding of communism is all from a critique of labor camps and authoritarianism - not the actual theories and ideas of socialism or communism
It’s more than a critique of communism/socialism
It’s a critique of ideological social engineering in general
You can't expect me to read your mind. It's way easier for both of us if you just explained where I'm wrong.
Just because a company exists doesn’t mean it’s actually needed. Like we don’t actually NEED random s*** delivered to us in 2 days. People pay for it because of the convenience, but those jobs aren’t “needed” for a functioning society
not taking sides here but Chinese and Russian culture is much more distinct then western culture in general
like what is American culture, its only be around for what 250 years now and has changed rapidly their isn't any tradition unlike China
its same as Australia we just take from other countries and its just this melting pot of different ideas and cultures
hmm i dont think so
If you produce less value then what you consume, it has to be at somebody else's cost by definition.
@LuxuryWhip Why do you view communism as a static thing?
Capitalism has existed for hundreds of years and was the direct successor to feudalism, it's been tried hundreds of times.
It hasn't even been hundred years since the end of the Russian civil war and communism has only been attempted a handful of times since then. It's had it's failures and successes. But we can learn from them and the next Socialist country can avoid those mistakes.
can i ask question
whats everyones opinion of getting rid of private and religious schools and making everyone go to just to local state school?
If you produce less value then what you consume, it has to be at somebody else's cost by definition.
Sounds like a good argument against the capitalist class
Just because a company exists doesn’t mean it’s actually needed. Like we don’t actually NEED random s*** delivered to us in 2 days. People pay for it because of the convenience, but those jobs aren’t “needed” for a functioning society
That's not for you to decide, value is subjective and decided by supply and demand. But either way, what about jobs like farming and construction work? Who's going to do those?
@LuxuryWhip Why do you view communism as a static thing?
Capitalism has existed for hundreds of years and was the direct successor to feudalism, it's been tried hundreds of times.
It hasn't even been hundred years since the end of the Russian civil war and communism has only been attempted a handful of times since then. It's had it's failures and successes. But we can learn from them and the next Socialist country can avoid those mistakes.
I don’t necessarily view it as a static thing
But I feel that what it lacks at its core is a consideration of the inherent value of the individual
By its nature it relies on collectivism, it relies on making everybody ‘equal’ via arbitrary categorisation of people. Because of that it can never truly succeed
Capitalism succeeds and fails also, but capitalism is more conducive with western values of individual value, that’s why it’s always resulted in countries that are much better off overall