Outside of being the ML scapegoat for the USSR's "revisionism", he's really unremarkable as a figure imo. I guess he represented the leadership at that point, buncha cynical climbers vaguely wedded to the idea of socialism.
He is the Maoist scapegoat not the ML
Also Khruschev era leadership wasnt that cynical, that happened in the late Brezhnev era
I think he was an alright leader for the most part and the hate of him is super overstated
He still lied a lot in the secret speech
Peaceful coexistence was a bad idea
Didn't support revolutions enough
A lot of people get the timeline wrong and think profit of individual firms was introduced under Khrushchev tho for some reason and their whole disdain for him is based on that
He still lied a lot in the secret speech
Peaceful coexistence was a bad idea
Didn't support revolutions enough
A lot of people get the timeline wrong and think profit of individual firms was introduced under Khrushchev tho for some reason and their whole disdain for him is based on that
Secret speech was a mistake yeeh
Peaceful co-existence was just a continuation of Stalin's policy tbh and some of the stuff Mao suggested to him like nuclear warfare was insane
We have a very large territory and a big population. Atomic bombs could not kill all of us. What if they killed 300 million of us? We would still have many people left.
Secret speech was a mistake yeeh
Peaceful co-existence was just a continuation of Stalin's policy tbh and some of the stuff Mao suggested to him like nuclear warfare was insane
Stalin's socialism in one country was more about first developing socialism in the USSR before concerning yourself with supporting other revolutions. Khrushchev just said that socialism and capitalism as systems can peacefully coexist in the world ideologically, it was an abandonment of world revolution.
Stalin's socialism in one country was more about first developing socialism in the USSR before concerning yourself with supporting other revolutions. Khrushchev just said that socialism and capitalism as systems can peacefully coexist in the world ideologically, it was an abandonment of world revolution.
Socialism in one country was pre WW2
After WW2 Stalin contemplated joining NATO and didnt wanna support Greece to not piss off the UK
Socialism in one country was pre WW2
After WW2 Stalin contemplated joining NATO and didnt wanna support Greece to not piss off the UK
But it wasn't solidified as a stated policy and theory until under Khrushchev. Stalin was wrong for that but I don't think he ever thought capitalism and socialism as competing world systems could ever coexist.
But it wasn't solidified as a stated policy and theory until under Khrushchev. Stalin was wrong for that but I don't think he ever thought capitalism and socialism as competing world systems could ever coexist.
I genuinely think Stalin was wishfully thinking it could happen for a few years after WW2, maybe like until the Korean War
I genuinely think Stalin was wishfully thinking it could happen for a few years after WW2, maybe like until the Korean War
Maybe
Stalin's note also happened between WW2 and the Korean war so I could see that
But he never went so far as Khrushchev in stopping to advocate for violent revolution. It was that doctrine of peaceful coexistence that lead to tensions between Cuba and the USSR since Cuba kept supporting violent revolution both ideologically and materially.
The funniest s*** is Dengists who love Deng but hate Khrushchev
Dengoids who call Khruschev a revisionist
New FREUDOMARXIST theory:
When socialist states no longer really Marxist yet still got their ideological legitimacy from that, they gotta present their regular ass policy as THEORY under an IDEOLOGICAL PROFUNDITY PRETENSE so their policy seems more significant. This is a POST-HOC RATIONALIZING COPE, as Freud would say, which makes this post a profound contribution to the legacy of Freudomarxist theory.
Case in point, CHYNA Three Represents theory:
"The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
Representing the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces.
Representing the orientation of China's advanced culture.
Representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people"
This is very profound, and an important contribution to Marxist theory.
Case in point, CHYNA Three Represents theory:
"The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
Representing the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces.
Representing the orientation of China's advanced culture.
Representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people"
This is very profound, and an important contribution to Marxist theory.
Bro i used a AI text generator to this i'm crying
The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
Representing the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces.
Representing the orientation of China's advanced culture.
Representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people, which are firmly rooted in national self-interests. We hereby call upon all political parties to make strong efforts to reach consensus and coexistence on issues relating mainly to economic cooperation between countries with different approaches toward developing their economy under auspices specific for that purpose, rather than making ideological or sectarian differences among themselves over what is right/wrong about them. To contribute towards this objective by not merely being positive partners but actively building constructive connections at both individual and collective levels! The leaders said above made a lot more sense if they weren't quoted so often during such debates; however there was one important aspect missing from most reports - many party member comments regardin
New FREUDOMARXIST theory:
When socialist states no longer really Marxist yet still got their ideological legitimacy from that, they gotta present their regular ass policy as THEORY under an IDEOLOGICAL PROFUNDITY PRETENSE so their policy seems more significant. This is a POST-HOC RATIONALIZING COPE, as Freud would say, which makes this post a profound contribution to the legacy of Freudomarxist theory.

New FREUDOMARXIST theory:
When socialist states no longer really Marxist yet still got their ideological legitimacy from that, they gotta present their regular ass policy as THEORY under an IDEOLOGICAL PROFUNDITY PRETENSE so their policy seems more significant. This is a POST-HOC RATIONALIZING COPE, as Freud would say, which makes this post a profound contribution to the legacy of Freudomarxist theory. It actually empowers people with additional tools of rationalization in contrast to it’s minimalist implications. A common mistake that people make is in understanding that any state that is going to keep up its slogans with this post facto ideological darwinistic PROFUNDITY business will get dismissed by the masses. By simply accepting this meta-theory of ideological self legitimization, people have the power to believe that these states are TRUE. In a word: They have TO LIE INSTEAD OF TELLING THE TRUTH. Actually, people do believe them, sometimes they might even make jokes about it. You just never know because it’s the same thing, because the state can always publish more literature to make itself appear as more correct.
For more on this issue, read FREUDOMARXIST LIES: A NEW FORM OF MORALITY.
AI text generatoe making China fascist
The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
Representing the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces.
Representing the orientation of China's advanced culture.
Representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people, and representing its essential economic interest to everyone on Earth — this was referred by Chiang Kai-shek to himself for his "Chinese model" economy – that is, not any particular political or religious one but just general industrial production; it could be called an expression about what would happen if all those who do not own a home were given equal shares of national income along with equally large sharers' homes: because everybody has their piece of heaven—their lifeblood which must always go into building factories…. This basic philosophy applied also today through various phases like collective investment efforts.1 One should note here that before starting off he tells us agai
The thesis that China's backwardness and undeveloped capitalism were to blame for its relative backwardness compared to other capitalist countries has been criticized by some who claim that capitalism was always dominant in China, and that it only became more dominant with the Maoist victory and socialism with Chinese characteristics
Why does AI keep making China fascist I'm crying
Xi Jinping Thought consists of a 14-point basic policy as follows:20
Ensuring Communist Party of China leadership over all forms of work in China.
The Communist Party of China should take a people-centric approach for the public interest.
The continuation of "comprehensive deepening of reforms".
China's People's Liberation Army and Red Guards must unite to achieve socialist development that is compatible with Utopia.22:30 One party, one system (of which Xi was aware) implies broad consensus among top leaders within it; those not interested in or sympathetic towards this direction have failed 23. The Chinese state needs external help—not just from outside but also domestically: on issues such eugenics24, education,25). These two goals can be achieved through coordinated efforts by political organs at different levels while still maintaining flexibility about policies where necessary. Reformers like former Prime Minister Deng Xiaoping would agree given he believed reform needed mor
Radlib CHYNA:
Xi Jinping Thought consists of a 14-point basic policy as follows:20
Ensuring Communist Party of China leadership over all forms of work in China.
The Communist Party of China should take a people-centric approach for the public interest.
The continuation of "comprehensive deepening of reforms". In addition to this, we will continue working towards creating an environment which is conducive and equitable so that new workers can find employment while contributing efficiently with their own savings, etc.22:104 The party must support those institutions by providing quality services on time, being transparent about them, establishing good regulations against abuse of power, preventing cases where officials get rich from corruption, fighting corrupt practices,23, setting up comprehensive legal system within 5 years24) We need more skilled jobs rather than fewer.(6) An inclusive society like Western countries has always been better when there are qualified staff willing or able both at home (unemployed foreign students/non
AI text generatoe making China fascist
The CCP identified itself as the representatives in three levels
Representing the development trend of China’s advanced productive forces.
Representing the orientation of China's advanced culture.
Representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the Chinese people, and representing its essential economic interest to everyone on Earth — this was referred by Chiang Kai-shek to himself for his "Chinese model" economy – that is, not any particular political or religious one but just general industrial production; it could be called an expression about what would happen if all those who do not own a home were given equal shares of national income along with equally large sharers' homes: because everybody has their piece of heaven—their lifeblood which must always go into building factories…. This basic philosophy applied also today through various phases like collective investment efforts.1 One should note here that before starting off he tells us agai
Remember when scott made a communist trump bot that kept saying "my uncle fred always told us to buy s*** from china and now i have all this useless s*** from china but hey that’s what my uncle asked us to do so"