Communism Thread

Page 256 of 1355
Reply
  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    do you have any interest in worker ownership over the means of production?

    Yes, via the state.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    China is a neoliberal state, by definition, and the West claims it is following Marxism-Leninism, but I don't even believe it's that simple. They are two dogs of the same global capitalist hegemony.

    "the West claims it is following Marxism-Leninism"
    okay

    I'll ask you again would you prefer a world where China was not a ML project but instead a blatant neoliberal capitalist state?

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    do you have any interest in worker ownership over the means of production?

    i think you should read state and revolution. i wouldn't consider myself to be of any tendency but the book was much much more than what i thought it would be about and i would highly recommend it.

  • Oct 3, 2021

    Imagine an American telling Xi the country he leads isn't Marxist-Leninist

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    "the West claims it is following Marxism-Leninism"
    okay

    I'll ask you again would you prefer a world where China was not a ML project but instead a blatant neoliberal capitalist state?

    China isn't even close to fulfilling the proposed goals of MLism, there will be no abolition of the state, it will keep going. Marx said that the state should be abolished and control should be given directly to the workers themselves. This is what the soviets were, before Lenin broke them when he took power.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    China isn't even close to fulfilling the proposed goals of MLism, there will be no abolition of the state, it will keep going. Marx said that the state should be abolished and control should be given directly to the workers themselves. This is what the soviets were, before Lenin broke them when he took power.

    its a simple question sniper

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    i think you should read state and revolution. i wouldn't consider myself to be of any tendency but the book was much much more than what i thought it would be about and i would highly recommend it.

    this is the issue, most MLs only get their understanding of Marx from Lenin and his contemporaries and don't engage with the work on its own.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    its a simple question sniper

    I stand firm bro, it is state capitalism like an ML state should be, in theory, but it has much more free market elements economically.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    this is the issue, most MLs only get their understanding of Marx from Lenin and his contemporaries and don't engage with the work on its own.

    i literally read engels. state and revolution is about much deeper questions than MLism

  • Oct 3, 2021
    deadacc

    i literally read engels. state and revolution is about much deeper questions than MLism

    Also Marx and Engels are not the same thing, they dissented from each other and disagreed.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    I stand firm bro, it is state capitalism like an ML state should be, in theory, but it has much more free market elements economically.

    not about whether its socialist or not but about whether you'd rather a world where China was a blatant American-style neoliberal capitalist country or what it is now

  • Oct 3, 2021
    deadacc

    not about whether its socialist or not but about whether you'd rather a world where China was a blatant American-style neoliberal capitalist country or what it is now

    I've tried to tell you this like three times already, the current economic system of China was inspired by western neoliberalism in the 70s, Deng admitted this himself. It is just neoliberal capitalism with some state control. I mean I'm not one to argue in favor of Mao but he was generally right in calling Deng, his rival, a liberal.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    I don't like either China or America, I don't like the nation-state at all. I want to do away with it, like Marx and even Engels said, although Engels was slightly more authoritarian than Marx

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    I don't like either China or America, I don't like the nation-state at all. I want to do away with it, like Marx and even Engels said, although Engels was slightly more authoritarian than Marx

    i get that but as an even nominally "socialist" project if there were to be a successful revolution in whatever country you live in, would you rather it be in a world where Communist China exists or one where it doesn't

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    deadacc

    i get that but as an even nominally "socialist" project if there were to be a successful revolution in whatever country you live in, would you rather it be in a world where Communist China exists or one where it doesn't

    I don't really care because China hasn't achieved communism, I mean, that's what everyone's waiting for, right, and people have been waiting for about 70 years. The whole ideology's core ("state socialism") is just sitting on a pinky promise for the state leadership to benevolently dissolve the state and relinquish their power into a worker-controlled egalitarian society once the material conditions are met.

    I mean, by Marx's definition, it's not "Communist China", they are still capitalists.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper
    · edited

    I don't really care because China hasn't achieved communism, I mean, that's what everyone's waiting for, right, and people have been waiting for about 70 years. The whole ideology's core ("state socialism") is just sitting on a pinky promise for the state leadership to benevolently dissolve the state and relinquish their power into a worker-controlled egalitarian society once the material conditions are met.

    I mean, by Marx's definition, it's not "Communist China", they are still capitalists.

    The promise will be fulfilled with Xi

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    sniper

    I don't really care because China hasn't achieved communism, I mean, that's what everyone's waiting for, right, and people have been waiting for about 70 years. The whole ideology's core ("state socialism") is just sitting on a pinky promise for the state leadership to benevolently dissolve the state and relinquish their power into a worker-controlled egalitarian society once the material conditions are met.

    I mean, by Marx's definition, it's not "Communist China", they are still capitalists.

    i believe so. there is nothing to convince me otherwise. but even if they don't, the world is better off China being oriented the way it is than any right deviation until that point.

    until the day of your idealized socialism is reality, and even past that day, having and supporting sympathetic socialist projects is much more important than the sectarianism you commit to every day.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    i believe so. there is nothing to convince me otherwise. but even if they don't, the world is better off China being oriented the way it is than any right deviation until that point.

    until the day of your idealized socialism is reality, and even past that day, having and supporting sympathetic socialist projects is much more important than the sectarianism you commit to every day.

    How is it "idealized socialism" when they aren't even socialist by definition? How is it gonna reach socialism if it just perpetuates the state over and over again?

    Materialist a***ysis of history shows why you can't use state power to abolish the state, and why every attempt has resulted in the opposite effect, that ends up re-creating capitalist conditions, and at best, socdem-esque "reformed" capitalism with a nationalistic bent.

  • Oct 3, 2021
    sniper

    How is it "idealized socialism" when they aren't even socialist by definition? How is it gonna reach socialism if it just perpetuates the state over and over again?

    Materialist a***ysis of history shows why you can't use state power to abolish the state, and why every attempt has resulted in the opposite effect, that ends up re-creating capitalist conditions, and at best, socdem-esque "reformed" capitalism with a nationalistic bent.

    that's why i'm saying your idealized version of socialism whatever it may be

    in literal terms not to quote parenti

  • Nort 💫
    Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    edited
    Sloth

    Yes, via the state.

    why not direct ownership by the workers?

  • Nort 💫
    Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Sloth

    The promise will be fulfilled with Xi

    how

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    how

    xi literally promised it by 2050 and he probably will continue to be renewed for president until its achieved

  • Nort 💫
    Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    xi literally promised it by 2050 and he probably will continue to be renewed for president until its achieved

    so i’m just meant to take him at his word?

  • Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Nort

    so i’m just meant to take him at his word?

    you don't have to he's still gonna keep doing things the way he does regardless. i do personally cuz im convinced based on the current trajectory of things but nobody will truly know until the time it happens.

  • Nort 💫
    Oct 3, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    deadacc

    you don't have to he's still gonna keep doing things the way he does regardless. i do personally cuz im convinced based on the current trajectory of things but nobody will truly know until the time it happens.

    what’s socialism/communism to you? i’m curious. I imagine we differ here.