People may argue that settlers represent a sort of historical PMC but realistically especially in modern western counties most people are not descendants of a slave owning exploitation class
little nitpick but slaving owner =\= settler, jefferson yeoman who raided an indian village then stole some land cultivated it themselves or just bought land that were stolen are settlers
but yeah i get your point in my own experience i dont know many canadians canadian (like from settler families) most of the white people in know came from immigrant families (polish,italian)
not gonna directly engage with that racist but once again he swings and misses. settler-colonialism is not "a thing white people did" and now must atone for, its a mode of production rooted in a specific relationship between land, labor, and capital. its a particular economic system which forms the basis of the american political economy and the only way to actually break the back of it is to change the basic relationship that the USA's internal colonies have with the land itself, which is what happened in every other African and Asian settler-colony. he's pivoting to this "original sin" thing that nobody was talking about because he either doesn't understand that settler-colonialism isn't a***ogous with capitalism or is being obtuse on purpose.
white people are not victims of settler-colonialism and im not sure how one even comes to this conclusion unless you really believe that de facto segregation and racial apartheid doesn't exist in the US (when did it go away?) and that the conditions of capitalism broadly cut across racial lines (this is of course a convenient lie white people tell themselves when they aren't forced to live on reservations or in urban bantustans, white people have clean water and well funded schools on accident i guess).
Bear post is an incredibly important piece
Fellas don't know about the fighting spirit
Fight for revolution but can't fight a bear?
this is so funny
the biggest chance of a presidential candidate potentially being assassinated by a victim of a modern day mk ultra and no one cares
Depends what type of gay son
There’s a lot of types of gay sons but only one type of thot daughter
This is not true. Edm happy hats are vastly different from BMW w****s.
ngl, yall weird for continuing to kiki with that moron
People like him more than you
Right wing Westerners are free speech absolutists, but when it comes to putting kids in cages all of a sudden “well there are some nuances to the situation”
Manu minute itt im
People may argue that settlers represent a sort of historical PMC but realistically especially in modern western counties most people are not descendants of a slave owning exploitation class
little nitpick but slaving owner =\= settler, jefferson yeoman who raided an indian village then stole some land cultivated it themselves or just bought land that were stolen are settlers
but yeah i get your point in my own experience i dont know many canadians canadian (like from settler families) most of the white people in know came from immigrant families (polish,italian)
Yeah you’re right on the nitpick, there’s a difference there which is comparable but not exactly the same
I don’t think Marxism needs to be stretched. I also don’t think people need to just “forgive” each other or similar. You’re a Maoist so you can understand innately that contradictions can exist outside of capitalism - this obviously leans in that direction.
I don’t expect anyone to just “forgive and forget” historical atrocities but also acting as if in many cases settlers’ ancestors are not also victims of the capitalist system shows heavy bias towards superstructural cultural elements. People may argue that settlers represent a sort of historical PMC but realistically especially in modern western counties most people are not descendants of a slave owning exploitation class. They may have enabled additional people to get here who then benefited but the US (and many other counties) are not South Africa where the Boers are just holistically of a specific background.
The thinking on modern settler colonialism acts as if contradictions can’t exist such as white settlers being responsible for exploitation but the white descendants then being victims of their ancestors’ promotion of said economic system. It leads to the same thinking as all Jews = pro-Israel therefore to solve the Israel-Palestine conflict, all Jews are culpable. It harkens back to concepts of original sin and atonement through recognition of contradiction. On the contrary, I don’t think this means “well white people are just guilt-free”. However focusing on the racial fault lines as the sole basis for radical action is weird when the racial fault lines are meant to fit within a wider dialectic. It’s not a replacement for economic consideration or post-economic struggle
in the South (specifically Louisiana) theres a ton of white people who are the descendants of wealthy slave-owners and theres even some last names which are notorious for being slave-owners lol. this is totally anecdotal so cant say how accurate it is since I don't live there
also theres lots of plantation tours that are still owned by the descendants of the slave owners
@Snowboy actually believes that a Communist future is possible and seems to have extensive experience organizing irl (like @PhilipMorris) so its kinda lame to insinuate that shes like a pseudo-Marxist/doesn't believe in materialism or something
@Snowboy actually believes that a Communist future is possible and seems to have extensive experience organizing irl (like @PhilipMorris) so its kinda lame to insinuate that shes like a pseudo-Marxist/doesn't believe in materialism or something
They can ask the whole city about Snowboy
she earnt that respect in our streets (shall not be named)
I am prepared to conduct diplomatic relations between the two parties at our meet up. Parties are allowed to bring two additional personnel into the meeting. Simple, straightforward discussion. No Funny business.

in the South (specifically Louisiana) theres a ton of white people who are the descendants of wealthy slave-owners and theres even some last names which are notorious for being slave-owners lol. this is totally anecdotal so cant say how accurate it is since I don't live there
also theres lots of plantation tours that are still owned by the descendants of the slave owners
Of course there are, I don’t think I’m denying that or saying that doesn’t exist? It can be true simultaneously that post-colonial slaveholders still control significant wealth due to exploitation and are of course white but also there’s a lot of whites in the country whose ancestors came as migrants and suffered from the same societal mechanisms built by chattel slavers and colonial settlers? The vast majority of Americans now had family which came from late 1800s or early-mid 1900s migrants.
this is how countries felt choosing between Soviet Union and China during sino-Soviet split

Of course there are, I don’t think I’m denying that or saying that doesn’t exist? It can be true simultaneously that post-colonial slaveholders still control significant wealth due to exploitation and are of course white but also there’s a lot of whites in the country whose ancestors came as migrants and suffered from the same societal mechanisms built by chattel slavers and colonial settlers? The vast majority of Americans now had family which came from late 1800s or early-mid 1900s migrants.
there’s a lot of whites in the country whose ancestors came as migrants
ik, i wasnt arguing against you on this point. it was just pretty wild to see how many white people are the descendants of slave owners and materially benefit from it
and many white settlers who came after the civil war still benefitted from the subjugation and looting of Black people, no?
there’s a lot of whites in the country whose ancestors came as migrants
ik, i wasnt arguing against you on this point. it was just pretty wild to see how many white people are the descendants of slave owners and materially benefit from it
and many white settlers who came after the civil war still benefitted from the subjugation and looting of Black people, no?
Yeah I do agree with that as well separately
there’s a lot of whites in the country whose ancestors came as migrants
ik, i wasnt arguing against you on this point. it was just pretty wild to see how many white people are the descendants of slave owners and materially benefit from it
and many white settlers who came after the civil war still benefitted from the subjugation and looting of Black people, no?
Sorry I responded before you edited, I still do agree with that but I mean it’s more complicated when you consider the reasons why Jews, Irish, and Italian (the majority of “white” immigrants from that era) were actually coming here. It took them awhile to even be considered white, and while yes, there’s a post-hoc benefit still (to variable extents) these people still continue to suffer from capitalist mechanisms. And yes, i understand there are layers to suffering and differences in scope and effect, but regardless
essential reading, he had such a wild life
![]()
We feel Black Bolshevik is an influential work but we also have to note we have significant political differences with Harry Haywood. His political support for Stalin, even beyond Khrushchev's speech of Stalin's crimes in 1952, support for the USSR invasion of 1956 and prominent roll in the development of the "Anti-Revisionist Communist" movement i.e. Stalinist political groupings had a negative impact on the growth of the student left in the 1960s and the so-called New Communist Movement in the 1970s.
f***ing libcom man