Sometimes. The thing about psychedelic music is that the breadth of sounds is endless, the whole point was to come up with something new and bonkers every time.




But nah deadass Danny brown got a lot of psychedelic s***, im sure theres more out there specifically what you're looking for these were just the closest things in my mind atm
This exactly what the crackers said when Hip Hop first started getting popular
How this not locked yet
It’s stealing now cause niggas suck at it,Saweetie literally stealing beats lol. S*** was an art form back then tho,samples created a lot of moods and sounds we just don’t get today.
now tell me why i go to youtube after having this thread open and this is first video on my recommenders

f*** out my business feds
It’s stealing now cause niggas suck at it,Saweetie literally stealing beats lol. S*** was an art form back then tho,samples created a lot of moods and sounds we just don’t get today.
for real bro
One day we're gonna have the conversation how that anti-sampling rhetoric began as an anti-black attack on hip-hop music and culture.
One day we're gonna have the conversation how that anti-sampling rhetoric began as an anti-black attack on hip-hop music and culture.
everything isn't about race buddy.
One day we're gonna have the conversation how that anti-sampling rhetoric began as an anti-black attack on hip-hop music and culture.
Exactly
man idk how 2 post imgur's
imgur.com/a/g8yWYqD
Not really a lot of artists get mad or sue people when they are sampled without permission.
That is stealing, but sampling as a whole is not stealing. An artist deserves compensation for using a work they created, however, only if that work is commercially released. If I make a beat sampling someone and put it on YouTube (monetization off), then it is not stealing. I am not profiting off of their creation.
If I attempt to release it on a commercial mixtape or album via streaming or physical distribution and I do not get it cleared through the label that owns that piece of music, it is stealing.