risecrashingI agree with everything you said tho, 4's goated
Iv and San Andreas they really upped themselves. Iv at launch I realized over time it deserved more love . They hyped up choices though and choice mechanics were goofy
·1 reply
NeonNigga23the f***ed up thing is that gta6 being digital only is what's convincing me after all these years to buy a digital ps5
You S***
Marketing deal with a company that says best on ps5 pro I can’t be shocked disc isn’t a focus
·edited·1 reply
NibiruMy biggest issue with V is that it never hit the same for me as GTA IV. IV had a much more serious tone, a better story, and way better driving physics. The cars actually had weight, and the city felt more grounded. I’ll admit the missions in GTA IV could be repetitive, but the overall vibe, writing, and atmosphere were stronger.
V looked amazing for its time, especially the draw distance on PS3 and Xbox 360. But the game itself felt too plastic and arcadey to me. The driving was way too light, the story wasn’t as engaging, and the whole tone felt less serious and less immersive compared to IV.
I think the story here will have some goofy stuff.
s*** like this worries me though, looks like some disney channel s***
They do things in cycles. IV was a refreshed GTA 3 with better driving physics/mechanics and a story/vibe that matched 3's darker tone. V was a refreshed San Andreas. This will be a refreshed Vice City
- ·1 replyLaced· edited
They do things in cycles. IV was a refreshed GTA 3 with better driving physics/mechanics and a story/vibe that matched 3's darker tone. V was a refreshed San Andreas. This will be a refreshed Vice City
V lacked many of the best parts of San Andreas lol
- ·1 replyHaroldsChicken
V lacked many of the best parts of San Andreas lol
Like what
·3 repliesNibiruMy biggest issue with V is that it never hit the same for me as GTA IV. IV had a much more serious tone, a better story, and way better driving physics. The cars actually had weight, and the city felt more grounded. I’ll admit the missions in GTA IV could be repetitive, but the overall vibe, writing, and atmosphere were stronger.
V looked amazing for its time, especially the draw distance on PS3 and Xbox 360. But the game itself felt too plastic and arcadey to me. The driving was way too light, the story wasn’t as engaging, and the whole tone felt less serious and less immersive compared to IV.
I think the story here will have some goofy stuff.
s*** like this worries me though, looks like some disney channel s***
People look at IV with rose tinted glasses but in reality that game was incredibly streamlined in its features and abilities. I loved the story and atmosphere but compared to V, its greatness is grossly exaggerated.
No vehicle customization, limited attire/clothing stores, no aircrafts, no wildlife, no varied topography, no haircuts, no tattoos.
V had better vehicle variety, ocean exploration, random events, missions, collectibles and so much more.
- Laced
Like what
- rpg mechanics
- las Venturas
- area away from city a lot less enjoyable to me than San Andreas
- house robberies and additional side quest
- soul and writing of V really isn’t there at all for me with less memorable characters and villain
Millz
- Campari
People look at IV with rose tinted glasses but in reality that game was incredibly streamlined in its features and abilities. I loved the story and atmosphere but compared to V, its greatness is grossly exaggerated.
No vehicle customization, limited attire/clothing stores, no aircrafts, no wildlife, no varied topography, no haircuts, no tattoos.
V had better vehicle variety, ocean exploration, random events, missions, collectibles and so much more.
But the years worked on iv vs v is double Same as years worked on v to vi is double now .
·1 replyNibiruMy biggest issue with V is that it never hit the same for me as GTA IV. IV had a much more serious tone, a better story, and way better driving physics. The cars actually had weight, and the city felt more grounded. I’ll admit the missions in GTA IV could be repetitive, but the overall vibe, writing, and atmosphere were stronger.
V looked amazing for its time, especially the draw distance on PS3 and Xbox 360. But the game itself felt too plastic and arcadey to me. The driving was way too light, the story wasn’t as engaging, and the whole tone felt less serious and less immersive compared to IV.
I think the story here will have some goofy stuff.
s*** like this worries me though, looks like some disney channel s***
Looks like enemies out of watch dogs 2
The money imprint on the V logo which directly correlates to the theme and capitalistic commentary of the game is one of the best modern day logos.
- ·1 replyILoveCheeseCake
Looks like enemies out of watch dogs 2
Miss when hyper realism wasn’t the focus
- HaroldsChicken
Miss when hyper realism wasn’t the focus
Not a bad thing tbh. It’s all looking super stylized
- NeonNigga23 ♻️HaroldsChicken
You S***
F*** THE PS5 PRO
LickMyBallsCan't believe I share a planet with people who believe this isn't gonna be the greatest piece of media ever created
It's not gonna launch bigger than Sonic Mania
Rockstar avoiding leaks at all costs
·1 reply5 was mid
Played both 4 and 5 once and 4 was way more memorable
- LickMyBalls
No but for it's time it was pretty impressive, we're now in 2026 and technology has advanced so much and Rockstar has always set a new standard, so if u look at what they did with RDR 2 in 2018 then yeah I believe this game is gonna be something that won't have a rival for at least a few generations after or until Rockstar decides to put out a new game as ambitious as this
I think the AI in this might be crazy advanced, them boys was cooking
They such douchebags
They only we got post notifications on
- NeonNigga23 ♻️·3 replies
I just realized they didn’t drop a new trailer
·1 replyNeonNigga23I just realized they didn’t drop a new trailer
Just checked the dates and for GTA V the new trailer dropped a week after the pre order did
- NeonNigga23
I just realized they didn’t drop a new trailer
I can
I can see it
