I am saying any other system will be much worse. Because these scumbags you are talking about will do even better in any other system. Socialism and Communism just takes away a very unfair amount of money from the public in this "promise" to help the poor, when it will just get redistributed around to create a bigger and stronger government that can oppress its people and make them their b****.
I don't think our system is perfect either. I hate that corporations can influence politicians with money to do s*** that allows them to get bigger and bigger. I think a free market capitalist society works best when no one can influence the other but everyone has the freedom to grow their money through the power of their own effort.
That argument against socialism I feel doesnt apply today, in the age of information. That's a strong argument in the 60s, but look at the times today bro.
We haven't had a strong socialist economy in the modern times to know if it will fail or work. (China is a whole other story)
It would be waay harder for the corruption in socialism to take place today. The only reason it works under capitalism is again, because of how much money and power these companies hold. Think about it.
Id rather try and fail then keep this s*** show going on.
do corporations really not make the rules in america
are you this dumb
you at least have the choice to influence the public system rather than the private
I already addressed this, I don't like that there is lobbying in politics. A perfect system would be where nobody can influence politicians.
But any single day. I will take corporations getting rich over the gov getting rich.
you realize that the socialist government of bangladesh left the agricultural sector of its economy which was then 80% of the whole f***ing economy of the country privatized while nationalizing the other 20%. This offset private owners to enter the agricultural sector.
this lead to the agricultiural stagnating as private owners increased prices, slowing the economy while urban sectors grew
a complete nationalization of the country would have been effective
Nationalisation is not effective dumbo
Rihanna’s voice is what always hooked me onto her features and singles. I hope they can find someone just as good because Tinashe isn’t the one
Thats on that country to figure s*** out on how they can leave so little for them. Bangladesh is clearly in a far worse state than america and if anything these low wages suck, but if your wish of countries to stop hiring workers from poor countries to make their s*** came true, they would be in an even worse spot than they currently are.
the private elite (factory and farm owners) of bangladesh make a f***ton of money off of this, and they pay off the government to prevent change from happening. They won't change s***. What do you expect to happen?
the private elite (factory and farm owners) of bangladesh make a f***ton of money off of this, and they pay off the government to prevent change from happening. They won't change s***. What do you expect to happen?
thats on Bangladesh to figure s*** out. All I know is if they stopped getting work, that country is going into turmoil and will be far worse off than they already are.
I already addressed this, I don't like that there is lobbying in politics. A perfect system would be where nobody can influence politicians.
But any single day. I will take corporations getting rich over the gov getting rich.
Why tf would you prefer a private body with a proft motive to gain such profits and withhold them than a government that is communally controlled and independent from a profit motive from making such money?????
maybe she lost the passion for it yall
she never had a passion for it. she was a manufactured pop act.
thats on Bangladesh to figure s*** out. All I know is if they stopped getting work, that country is going into turmoil and will be far worse off than they already are.
so if the people of bangladesh got together, said f*** the international industry, overthrew the globalists who exploit them, and now are back to square one, what would we expect. Do we want the workers to own the industry so that they could finally get their justice, but deal with the scary word of communism, or do we want to continue the cycle of being buttfucked by America?
That argument against socialism I feel doesnt apply today, in the age of information. That's a strong argument in the 60s, but look at the times today bro.
We haven't had a strong socialist economy in the modern times to know if it will fail or work. (China is a whole other story)
It would be waay harder for the corruption in socialism to take place today. The only reason it works under capitalism is again, because of how much money and power these companies hold. Think about it.
Id rather try and fail then keep this s*** show going on.
I mean Venezuela went socialist. And a number of european countries are socialist. We see how badly it failed for Venezuela cuz of the corrupt ass leaders who just used all that tax money for their own gain.
European countries can survive being socialist (despite extremely high costs of living compared to america) because they have a far smaller wealth gap and they don't have to invest heavily into their military since they are protected by America.
she never had a passion for it. she was a manufactured pop act.
her s*** was hard too
im sad
Wait this must be the 30th thread today that turned into a socialism vs capitalism argument
tbh most of the things we buy probably aren’t 100% ethical so we just gotta pick and choose the least problematic brands to support
Why tf are y'all talking about Bangladesh and Venezuela in a thread about Rihanna shelving her album
but they do and where are the hits?
rihanna might not write but she got an ear for hits, not everyone can say that
tbh most of the things we buy probably aren’t 100% ethical so we just gotta pick and choose the least problematic brands to support
or we can work to change the world so we can comfortably enjoy any product we want without being reminded of the fact that children are making that s*** to go hungry
She can still promote her beauty crap and release an album. Gaga put out Chromatica during a pandemic, while doing stuff for BLM, and promoting her beauty line. Rihanna has no excuse
Why tf would you prefer a private body with a proft motive to gain such profits and withhold them than a government that is communally controlled and independent from a profit motive from making such money?????
Because the community doesn't give a s*** about who is elected in their government. It is evident when we have white supremacists, pedophiles, and rapists in our congress and state depts. Politicians that are getting in have so many connections already and tend to win thanks to how much money they can throw around to get voted in.
It is much better they aren't the ones getting money because it would be far worse than just a corporation getting a politician to vote in favor of some bill they want. We saw enough cases of "trillions of dollars lost in accounting errors" headlines during the Obama presidency to know what happens when the gov gets even a little extra tax money.