Oct 9, 2022·1 replyPlanktonIt’s pretty obvious they are behind the Nordstream one
- Oct 9, 2022·3 repliesSEGA GOON
The pipeline that provides gas to Europe, who they are wanting to cut gas off from anyway?
This is like when people blamed the US for A*sad gassing his own people again. Real scum s***. Once again says a lot you commies have the exact same take as Tucker Carlson. Never change.
Oct 9, 2022·2 repliesPlanktonThe pipeline that provides gas to Europe, who they are wanting to cut gas off from anyway?
This is like when people blamed the US for A*sad gassing his own people again. Real scum s***. Once again says a lot you commies have the exact same take as Tucker Carlson. Never change.
Usually when a country wants to stop supplying gas.....they often decide to just turn the taps off, which Russia had already done. They don't bomb it
Russia got blamed for using the pipeline as blackmail to Europe, and then bombed their leverage?
You should also look into U.S opinions and protests to Russian gas to Europe over the past 40 years
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replyPlankton
The pipeline that provides gas to Europe, who they are wanting to cut gas off from anyway?
This is like when people blamed the US for A*sad gassing his own people again. Real scum s***. Once again says a lot you commies have the exact same take as Tucker Carlson. Never change.
Yes destroy your only leverage, very logical
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replySEGA GOON
Yes destroy your only leverage, very logical
Hard to say it’s their only leverage when they are threatening nuclear armageddon
- Oct 9, 2022YANDHI
Usually when a country wants to stop supplying gas.....they often decide to just turn the taps off, which Russia had already done. They don't bomb it
Russia got blamed for using the pipeline as blackmail to Europe, and then bombed their leverage?
You should also look into U.S opinions and protests to Russian gas to Europe over the past 40 years
Plausible deniability my guy
- Oct 9, 2022Plankton
Hard to say it’s their only leverage when they are threatening nuclear armageddon
Dont make me pull up the ukrainians hyping up nuclear war
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replyPlankton
The pipeline that provides gas to Europe, who they are wanting to cut gas off from anyway?
This is like when people blamed the US for A*sad gassing his own people again. Real scum s***. Once again says a lot you commies have the exact same take as Tucker Carlson. Never change.
there have been actual scientific papers by emeritus professors questioning what happened in Syria, at least in Douma
theodore postol literally worked in the pentagon and aided US military research for years and is a decorated scientists institutionally and academically also before you accuse him of being a foreign asset
obviously it's up for wider debate but acting like there's never been any reason to question the situation with assad besides just ideological bias is idiotic
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replyYANDHI
Usually when a country wants to stop supplying gas.....they often decide to just turn the taps off, which Russia had already done. They don't bomb it
Russia got blamed for using the pipeline as blackmail to Europe, and then bombed their leverage?
You should also look into U.S opinions and protests to Russian gas to Europe over the past 40 years
tbh ive said it before but i can kinda see it from the perspective if russia expected US/EU to stop buying from them anyway, they may as well do it and sow internal discord/distrust of the US. Especially if there's a US/EU policy coalition forming even more closely than it was before, on Russia's end if they're like okay this is gonna end up with us losing access due to coming escalated sanctions anyway, we may as well create a situation where the avg citizen will likely blame the US and/or simply have further rhetorical recourse for anti-interventionalism. I've been pretty neutral in this thread in general but i do think there's strategic value in doing these things more than people will want to admit.
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replykrishna bound
tbh ive said it before but i can kinda see it from the perspective if russia expected US/EU to stop buying from them anyway, they may as well do it and sow internal discord/distrust of the US. Especially if there's a US/EU policy coalition forming even more closely than it was before, on Russia's end if they're like okay this is gonna end up with us losing access due to coming escalated sanctions anyway, we may as well create a situation where the avg citizen will likely blame the US and/or simply have further rhetorical recourse for anti-interventionalism. I've been pretty neutral in this thread in general but i do think there's strategic value in doing these things more than people will want to admit.
Except that didn't happen at all, the mainstream is hammering it into the heads that it was Russia. So IDK, seems like a reaction the FSB could have foreseen. Unless of course they are very incompetent
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replykrishna bound
there have been actual scientific papers by emeritus professors questioning what happened in Syria, at least in Douma
https://d3ba7j4nna908t.cloudfront.net/attachments/Attachment+4+-+Computational+Forensic+Analysis+for+the+Chemical+Weapons+Attack+at+Khan+Sheikhoun+on+April+4.+2017_S.pdf
theodore postol literally worked in the pentagon and aided US military research for years and is a decorated scientists institutionally and academically also before you accuse him of being a foreign asset
obviously it's up for wider debate but acting like there's never been any reason to question the situation with assad besides just ideological bias is idiotic
It’s perfectly reasonable to question it given what USG did and proposed to do in the 50s and 60s, but let’s be real, Tucker and them were acting like it was 100% the USA who did it.
- Oct 9, 2022SEGA GOON
Except that didn't happen at all, the mainstream is hammering it into the heads that it was Russia. So IDK, seems like a reaction the FSB could have foreseen. Unless of course they are very incompetent
I'm not saying it was Russia 100%, I can of course see the angle for which the US would do it too. But I'm just saying acting like there's 0 reason Russia would ever do it isn't true. If the US did it, then US & US allies are gonna say Russia did it anyway - if Russia did it, then US & US allies are gonna say it was Russia too. So there's never a scenario where europe is gonna be like "yeah it was actually the US guys, pack it up" even if it was the US. that plausible deniability gives a lot of strategic ambiguity to an enemy esp. because they know people who distrust the authority there are likely to distrust public opinion regardless.
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replyPlankton
It’s perfectly reasonable to question it given what USG did and proposed to do in the 50s and 60s, but let’s be real, Tucker and them were acting like it was 100% the USA who did it.
well yeah, but my point is that just because propagandists of a certain party say certain things doesnt mean the contrary take is always correct. tucker also said once we should hold corrupt pharmaceutical companies and a broken healthcare system responsible for opioid epidemics - bad messenger, sure, but it doesn't mean the opioid crisis doesn't exist. thinking when outcome/messages fall adjacent to a political alignment the outcome must be flawed if the alignment is flawed is one reason the current political landscape in the US is such a mess.
- Oct 9, 2022·1 replykrishna bound
well yeah, but my point is that just because propagandists of a certain party say certain things doesnt mean the contrary take is always correct. tucker also said once we should hold corrupt pharmaceutical companies and a broken healthcare system responsible for opioid epidemics - bad messenger, sure, but it doesn't mean the opioid crisis doesn't exist. thinking when outcome/messages fall adjacent to a political alignment the outcome must be flawed if the alignment is flawed is one reason the current political landscape in the US is such a mess.
That was my point too as well lol. But with the acknowledgement that generally Russia and friends will trend more corrupt and evil than US and friends, so the default assumption is generally that these things aren't false flags, all else being equal.
Oct 9, 2022 
Oct 10, 2022·3 replieswhen y'all think this ends
Oct 10, 2022PlanktonThat was my point too as well lol. But with the acknowledgement that generally Russia and friends will trend more corrupt and evil than US and friends, so the default assumption is generally that these things aren't false flags, all else being equal.
- Oct 10, 2022·2 repliesHaroldsChicken
when y'all think this ends
Putins death may be an upper bound
- Oct 10, 2022·1 replyYuzzy
Putins death may be an upper bound
- Oct 10, 2022·1 replyhttps://twitter.com/Fxhedgers/status/1579344398105849856HaroldsChicken
Fxhedgers
- Oct 10, 2022·1 replyYuzzy
Fxhedgers
they not about it?
- Oct 10, 2022HaroldsChicken
they not about it?
No idea but haven't seen that from anyone else
They are followed by Joscha Bach though
- Oct 10, 2022HaroldsChicken
when y'all think this ends
29/02
- Oct 10, 2022
