He just died? Wow. I didn’t know that. You are telling me now for the first time. He led an amazing life. What else can you say. Whether you agreed or not, he was an amazing man who led an amazing life. I am actually sad to hear that. I am sad to hear that.
@Scratchin_Bandit felt that i know how high you revere deng
“yes, all the food was burned, but no, that’s not why there wasn’t any food left”
They didn't burn all the f***ing food you reprobate imbecile
They didn't burn all the f***ing food you reprobate imbecile
In 1934, an article by Isaak Mazepa, who was the leader of the Ukrainian nationalist movement at the time— he was a former Premier under Petliura in 1918, who was the Ukrainian that led the pogroms— he boasted that in Ukraine, the Right had succeeded,
in 1930 to 1932, in widely sabotaging the agricultural works.
He said, “At first there were disturbances in the kolkhozi, or else the communist officials and their agents were killed. But later, a system of passive resistance was favored, which aimed at the systematic frustration of the Bolsheviks’ plan for sowing and gathering the harvest. The catastrophe of 1932 was the hardest blow that the Soviet Union had to face since the famine of 1921
to 1922. The Ottoman Spring sowing campaigns both failed. Whole tracks were left unsown. In addition, when the crops were being gathered, in many areas, especially the South, 20, 40 or even 50% were left in the fields and was either not collected all or was ruined in the threshing.”
jstor.org/stable/4202897
They didn't burn all the f***ing food you reprobate imbecile
from the article you agreed with on the previous page
As Stalin’s orders to enforce collectivisation were carried out, many Kulaks responded by burning crops, killing livestock and damaging machinery. Millions of cattle and pigs were slaughtered and left to rot. Estimates of the quantity vary between 20% and 35% of all livestock being deliberately killed. The result was a famine. The country struggled to feed itself.
please, if a political party isn’t already paying you to shill your historically inaccurate takes all over this site, find one that will, so you’ll at least be making money while making a complete clown out of yourself.
from the article you agreed with on the previous page
As Stalin’s orders to enforce collectivisation were carried out, many Kulaks responded by burning crops, killing livestock and damaging machinery. Millions of cattle and pigs were slaughtered and left to rot. Estimates of the quantity vary between 20% and 35% of all livestock being deliberately killed. The result was a famine. The country struggled to feed itself.
please, if a political party isn’t already paying you to shill your historically inaccurate takes all over this site, find one that will, so you’ll at least be making money while making a complete clown out of yourself.
Imma need a citation for those statistics
The book why nations fail offers a far better explanation of pretty much everything that ever went wrong for the Soviet Union
In 1934, an article by Isaak Mazepa, who was the leader of the Ukrainian nationalist movement at the time— he was a former Premier under Petliura in 1918, who was the Ukrainian that led the pogroms— he boasted that in Ukraine, the Right had succeeded,
in 1930 to 1932, in widely sabotaging the agricultural works.
He said, “At first there were disturbances in the kolkhozi, or else the communist officials and their agents were killed. But later, a system of passive resistance was favored, which aimed at the systematic frustration of the Bolsheviks’ plan for sowing and gathering the harvest. The catastrophe of 1932 was the hardest blow that the Soviet Union had to face since the famine of 1921
to 1922. The Ottoman Spring sowing campaigns both failed. Whole tracks were left unsown. In addition, when the crops were being gathered, in many areas, especially the South, 20, 40 or even 50% were left in the fields and was either not collected all or was ruined in the threshing.”
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4202897
Does this get addressed in any of J Arch Getty's work? I started Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives lately but am not that far in
I'm sure it's included somewhere
Imma need a citation for those statistics
The book why nations fail offers a far better explanation of pretty much everything that ever went wrong for the Soviet Union
how about a source for your own claims ?
and not one that can be traced back to William Randolph Hearst, aka "If Hitler succeeds in pointing the way of peace and order,
he will have accomplished a measure of good, not only for his own people, but for all of humanity.”
Praying for healing and peace for everyone itt except those supporting Israel and pretending like they don't
how about a source for your own claims ?
and not one that can be traced back to William Randolph Hearst, aka "If Hitler succeeds in pointing the way of peace and order,
he will have accomplished a measure of good, not only for his own people, but for all of humanity.”
guilty pleasure WRH fascinating figure to me
only cause of like citizen kane and mank though
and lmao at the quote
Let's keep it real a lot of powerful people were f***in wit A.H. before s*** went down. Unfortunately.
U don't make it that far without people rocking with u. Again unfortunately
And even after the holocaust! The US said the nazis arent that bad come work with us against communism
Let's keep it real a lot of powerful people were f***in wit A.H. before s*** went down. Unfortunately.
U don't make it that far without people rocking with u. Again unfortunately
yes, especially soviets with stalin. molotov–ribbentrop pact was absent for decades in soviet books and poles were killed by nazis in katyn forest
Yall really cant look past the ideology yall have affinity with brehs, whether it be liberalism, communism, conservatism etc
Yall only look from that lense and w bias to things fr
yes, especially soviets with stalin. molotov–ribbentrop pact was absent for decades in soviet books and poles were killed by nazis in katyn forest

yes, especially soviets with stalin. molotov–ribbentrop pact was absent for decades in soviet books and poles were killed by nazis in katyn forest
I'm not familiar with the molotov-ribbentrop pact, nor the katyn forest so I cannot speak on that
But the thing was I was talking about something different than what you brought up. I can't help but feel it's irrelevant.
Like what part of my post would lead you to post what you just did? That's what I'm wondering right now.
I'm not familiar with the molotov-ribbentrop pact, nor the katyn forest so I cannot speak on that
But the thing was I was talking about something different than what you brought up. I can't help but feel it's irrelevant.
Like what part of my post would lead you to post what you just did? That's what I'm wondering right now.
Edit from the memes I get it. u playing ur side as expected.
Carry on

i didn't imply that westeners have no business with nazis. i just said ussr did that too. ussr started as agressor in ww2 and later came out as victim. simple as that
you're really on autopilot with these memes, dweeb
I'm not familiar with the molotov-ribbentrop pact, nor the katyn forest so I cannot speak on that
But the thing was I was talking about something different than what you brought up. I can't help but feel it's irrelevant.
Like what part of my post would lead you to post what you just did? That's what I'm wondering right now.
are you a tankie version of plancton?
are you a tankie version of plancton?
this made me laugh
credit where credit is due
i didn't imply that westeners have no business with nazis. i just said ussr did that too. ussr started as agressor in ww2 and later came out as victim. simple as that
you're really on autopilot with these memes, dweeb
To equivocate the USSR with Nazi Germany is heinous, but as expected with eastern european right wingers
Poland got attacked for taking an entire chunk of Ukraine in the 1918 war prior. For someone who cries about Ukraine all day, you should know this. Galicia was all taken by Poland and the USSR got it back 2 decades later. If not for that, Ukraine would have lost Lviv, a town I am sure is so dear to your heart as a Zelensky enthusiast
To equivocate the USSR with Nazi Germany is heinous, but as expected with eastern european right wingers
Poland got attacked for taking an entire chunk of Ukraine in the 1918 war prior. For someone who cries about Ukraine all day, you should know this. Galicia was all taken by Poland and the USSR got it back 2 decades later. If not for that, Ukraine would have lost Lviv, a town I am sure is so dear to your heart as a Zelensky enthusiast
eastern european right winger
zelensky enthusiast
ussr willing to help ukraine, not to expand their territory and influence
better stick to your memes, dweeb.
Even if holodomor was a genocide and intended. The Soviet Union even under stalin; which was a depraved, totalitarian mess, cannot be equivocated with nazi Germany , who killed many more Ukrainians.
That doesn't mean Soviets should get away with their s***. Timothy Snyder is the best on this topic. Taking aim at both VoC bullshit and tankie apologia.
Putin's russia is fascist.
Timothy Snyder