Apr 13, 2022·1 replyhttps://twitter.com/IAPonomarenko/status/1513946349632376833
TragedyBerlusconiZELENSKY REGIME CRACKS DOWN ON OPPOSITION
- Apr 13, 2022·1 replyScratchin Mamba
ZELENSKY REGIME CRACKS DOWN ON OPPOSITION
he was already under house arrest due to an ongoing criminal procedure
he escaped during the invasion
- Apr 13, 2022TragedyBerlusconi
he was already under house arrest due to an ongoing criminal procedure
he escaped during the invasion
Im sure u know what point i was making there
- Apr 13, 2022TragedyBerlusconi
i mean this is all tenuous and stupid, because some a******s say slava ukraini means the 99% of people who arent evil dont get their culturally important slogan that predates the existence of nazism (excluding heroiam slava)
if we banned everything even slightly used by reactionary bigots we'd have barely anything left
we gonna say 'allahu akbar' is bad because some a******s have said it before committing crimes? no we wont for obvious reasons
Some would argue that shouting your god is greater than others is frowned upon in 2022
Brother Khalqi who is a communist must certainly think so - all gods are equal in 2022
Apr 13, 2022·3 repliesSo a huge majority of Russia supports Putin even after the invasion, if it's trustworthy in a dictatorship ofc
- Apr 13, 2022Y0rn
So a huge majority of Russia supports Putin even after the invasion, if it's trustworthy in a dictatorship ofc
🫡 🪖zZz🪖 🫡
Apr 13, 2022·edited·2 repliesSo, uh, the Ukranian military technically did a false flag chemical attack? Nobody cares? I mean if they get some actual chemical weapons to do one they can start WWIII.
- Apr 13, 2022·1 replyMango· edited
So, uh, the Ukranian military technically did a false flag chemical attack? Nobody cares? I mean if they get some actual chemical weapons to do one they can start WWIII.
- Apr 13, 2022Mango· edited
So, uh, the Ukranian military technically did a false flag chemical attack? Nobody cares? I mean if they get some actual chemical weapons to do one they can start WWIII.
Pretty much what it’s sounding like lol
- Apr 13, 2022·1 replyY0rn
Anything to add? This is funny to you?
- Apr 13, 2022·1 replyMango
Anything to add? This is funny to you?
1. Azov did say that. How serious do you take them? It was only a couple cases. It could've been anything. Besides that, they are under heavy siege. There is always a chance they say there was a chemical attack in the hopes of the West interfering.
2. The USA said there will be consequences. Just like they said for Syria. So that means, nothing will happen as long as Russia isn't dumb enough to attack a NATO country. The use of chemical weapons won't make a difference either. The rest of the world won't start WWIII for Ukraine. You also said WWII.
3. They couldn't investigate it yet, cause Mariupol is under siege. But it seems unlikely. So whether they are telling the truth or not, we won't know anytime soon.
4. You're still only posting from one perspective of this war.
- Apr 13, 2022·2 repliesY0rn
1. Azov did say that. How serious do you take them? It was only a couple cases. It could've been anything. Besides that, they are under heavy siege. There is always a chance they say there was a chemical attack in the hopes of the West interfering.
2. The USA said there will be consequences. Just like they said for Syria. So that means, nothing will happen as long as Russia isn't dumb enough to attack a NATO country. The use of chemical weapons won't make a difference either. The rest of the world won't start WWIII for Ukraine. You also said WWII.
3. They couldn't investigate it yet, cause Mariupol is under siege. But it seems unlikely. So whether they are telling the truth or not, we won't know anytime soon.
4. You're still only posting from one perspective of this war.
1. Azov, the Ukrainian military did say that. Their reporting has been taken at face value many times in this war.
2. Syria is not a nuclear power, and Russia has been clear about their core deterrent regarding NATO escalation/interference.
3. There will literally never be evidence of absence. The Syrian gas attacks are still under dispute to this day.
4. My perspective as someone who doesn't want WWIII to occur and also sees no evidence of chemical attack nor a reason to do one just like the Pentagon. This should be everyone's perspective as it stands.
I'm not sure what your issue is? That I put it in too stark of terms?
Apr 13, 2022·1 replyMango1. Azov, the Ukrainian military did say that. Their reporting has been taken at face value many times in this war.
2. Syria is not a nuclear power, and Russia has been clear about their core deterrent regarding NATO escalation/interference.
3. There will literally never be evidence of absence. The Syrian gas attacks are still under dispute to this day.
4. My perspective as someone who doesn't want WWIII to occur and also sees no evidence of chemical attack nor a reason to do one just like the Pentagon. This should be everyone's perspective as it stands.
I'm not sure what your issue is? That I put it in too stark of terms?
The OPCW concluded that there was no verification of the use of chemical weapons in Douma
- Apr 14, 2022·edited·1 replyamericana
The OPCW concluded that there was no verification of the use of chemical weapons in Douma
https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/
The OPCW also concluded there were multiple instances that chemical weapons were used in Syria btw
- Apr 14, 2022·1 replyY0rn
The OPCW also concluded there were multiple instances that chemical weapons were used in Syria btw
i should reiterate. The OPCW suppressed, excluded, and redacted a number of findings that went directly against that narrative, which lead to whistleblowing and the leaked documents i linked.
for example, a member of the council expressing concern over the "introduction of internal bias" wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/document/Internal-OPCW-E-Mail
- Apr 14, 2022·editedMango
1. Azov, the Ukrainian military did say that. Their reporting has been taken at face value many times in this war.
2. Syria is not a nuclear power, and Russia has been clear about their core deterrent regarding NATO escalation/interference.
3. There will literally never be evidence of absence. The Syrian gas attacks are still under dispute to this day.
4. My perspective as someone who doesn't want WWIII to occur and also sees no evidence of chemical attack nor a reason to do one just like the Pentagon. This should be everyone's perspective as it stands.
I'm not sure what your issue is? That I put it in too stark of terms?
1. By who? Even Zelensky said it should be investigated, but didn't name it afterwards anymore. Probably cause even he doesn't take it as serious?
2. It just shows the USA has a big mouth but won't start a world war over chemical weapons, even if used. That Russia has nuclear weapons is another reason why NATO won't interfere directly until Russia attacks a NATO country. So you don't have to be afraid for WW3 at this moment.
3. Then we can't really say it did or didn't happen right? I maybe shouldn't say it's highly unlikely then, cause i can't prove anything. Just like you.
4. WW3 won't happen over Ukraine.
No issue. Just looking at the way you post regarding this conflict. Mostly one sided. It's interesting.
- Apr 14, 2022·1 replyamericana
i should reiterate. The OPCW suppressed, excluded, and redacted a number of findings that went directly against that narrative, which lead to whistleblowing and the leaked documents i linked.
for example, a member of the council expressing concern over the "introduction of internal bias" https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/document/Internal-OPCW-E-Mail/
This is about Douma right? But they also said there were attacks in other cities. If true or not, is difficult to say
- Apr 14, 2022
este video lo hace ver como un maniático
- Apr 14, 2022Y0rn
So a huge majority of Russia supports Putin even after the invasion, if it's trustworthy in a dictatorship ofc
Fart emoji iraq war
- Apr 14, 2022
- Apr 14, 2022·1 replyY0rn
This is about Douma right? But they also said there were attacks in other cities. If true or not, is difficult to say
Difficult to say when it's now on public record that they lied about Douma
- Apr 14, 2022·editedScratchin Mamba
Difficult to say when it's now on public record that they lied about Douma
Didn't even Assad admit he had used them at first? That's why they even became a OPCW member and promised to destroy 'all' of em. Also under the pressure of an American attack
Besides that, not the point i was trying to make. Just wanted to show there won't be a bigger war over the use of chemical weapons