Undecided

4y

I dont know where all this CRT s*** is coming from. My wife is a teacher and all it looks like is more work for her.

She works and buys enough classroom supplies for her class. Its taking over my garage.

Mango

4y

Can you ever engage the substance of the article I'm talking about

Ask yourself why you can't

Also, I have no clue if the author of the article I linked is on their editorial staff. Do you?

e t

4y

Any publication who’s viewpoints fall along a certain axis or ideology I can essentially wipe my ass with. I knew they would be a COVID psy-op believer or anti-Vaxxer the second I clicked. Same as the other wackjob Mango posted earlier.

bloom

4y

All I see is a punching bag and a document

KEV

4y

Punching bag? Oh the poor Moscow representative, he was probably forced to say those things

bloom

4y

I’m neither of these things and think his article holds weight. I’m super pro vax. You’re being intellectually lazy

MyBallsAndMyWord

4y

The COVID article is by the editorial staff. There is nothing to indicate the author of the Ukraine article is a member of said staff. And the author of the Ukraine article lived in Luhansk for a long period of time, which you would know if you actually read it

So how about you try reading for once and state what it is about the article itself you find disagreeable instead of riding your red herring to the sun

e t

4y

Again, it’s an article from a total random who’s only stated credentials are apparently being a foreign volunteer of an anti-fascist party. There is not a single source or reference listed to anything he says and the majority of it is clearly designed to evoke an emotional response, rather than focus on facts or explain anything.

The “publication” the article is posted on clearly has no intellectual standards for what it posts based on its COVID and other articles.

Here’s an example of a relevant and well-referenced article:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/welcome-to-surkovs-theater-russian-political-technology-in-the-donbas-war/B06C4BD46E958A48F07C877EFECCB3A0

Scratchin Mamba

4y

So this guy's argument is that if an author wrote an opinion piece in some media outlet, that means they share all the same views of the editorial staff?

So wait.... New York Times.. are you.. are you telling me you support PUTIN?!?

Rigrigo de Paul

4y

you dont have black people in your state, I'm not sure why they'd make a big deal about it there either tbh

PleaseDelete

4y

You never know what you stumble into here itt

e t

4y

Again, it’s an article from a total random who’s only stated credentials are apparently being a foreign volunteer of an anti-fascist party. There is not a single source or reference listed to anything he says and the majority of it is clearly designed to evoke an emotional response, rather than focus on facts or explain anything.

The “publication” the article is posted on clearly has no intellectual standards for what it posts based on its COVID and other articles.

Here’s an example of a relevant and well-referenced article:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/welcome-to-surkovs-theater-russian-political-technology-in-the-donbas-war/B06C4BD46E958A48F07C877EFECCB3A0

Villainous B

4y

Hungary also needs denazifying tbh

Y0rn

4y

Most of Europe including Russia tbh