Can you ever engage the substance of the article I'm talking about
Ask yourself why you can't
Also, I have no clue if the author of the article I linked is on their editorial staff. Do you?
It’s the exact same reason I don’t engage the “substance” of QAnon followers. I can predict the views on a variety of topics of most anyone y’all post. There’s a reason you can only find info to satisfy your cognitive biases and propagate your chosen echo chamber in these places. It’s quite sad.
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2021/10/11/countering-the-covid-19-psy-ops-unleashed-against-humanity/
Can you guys ever link to a single person that’s not a total nutjob? Clearly not. Ask yourself why that is.
Them being a covid denier or whatever doesn’t invalidate that article though lol
They can be right about one thing and wrong about another
This a flawed argument man
It’s the exact same reason I don’t engage the “substance” of QAnon followers. I can predict the views on a variety of topics of most anyone y’all post. There’s a reason you can only find info to satisfy your cognitive biases and propagate your chosen echo chamber in these places. It’s quite sad.
You've yet to link the author of the piece to their editorial staff. So you don't even have that tenuous argument anymore
You've yet to link the author of the piece to their editorial staff. So you don't even have that tenuous argument anymore
I don’t understand what you’re asking. What are the credentials of the author of the article you posted?
Them being a covid denier or whatever doesn’t invalidate that article though lol
They can be right about one thing and wrong about another
This a flawed argument man
Any publication who’s viewpoints fall along a certain axis or ideology I can essentially wipe my ass with. I knew they would be a COVID psy-op believer or anti-Vaxxer the second I clicked. Same as the other wackjob Mango posted earlier.
I don’t understand what you’re asking. What are the credentials of the author of the article you posted?
The COVID article is by the editorial staff. There is nothing to indicate the author of the Ukraine article is a member of said staff. And the author of the Ukraine article lived in Luhansk for a long period of time, which you would know if you actually read it
So how about you try reading for once and state what it is about the article itself you find disagreeable instead of riding your red herring to the sun
The COVID article is by the editorial staff. There is nothing to indicate the author of the Ukraine article is a member of said staff. And the author of the Ukraine article lived in Luhansk for a long period of time, which you would know if you actually read it
So how about you try reading for once and state what it is about the article itself you find disagreeable instead of riding your red herring to the sun
Are you saying the editorial staff don’t choose which article to post?
Oh he lived in Luhansk, give him the Nobel prize lmao
Y’all are gone
Are you saying the editorial staff don’t choose which article to post?
Oh he lived in Luhansk, give him the Nobel prize lmao
Y’all are gone
What parts of the article do you disagree with? Everything he’s saying is easily found online
And how does the editorial staff selecting the article negate what it has to say just because they (who again, didn’t write the Ukraine article) have some s***ty opinions on an entirely different topic
I only believe what REAL, UNBIASED news outlets like CNN have to say I am very smart
Let’s just go head and censor all independent journalists as a matter of fact, they can’t be trusted anyway. Also someone needs to assassinate Putin, there’s not even freedom of press in Russia!
What parts of the article do you disagree with? Everything he’s saying is easily found online
And how does the editorial staff selecting the article negate what it has to say just because they (who again, didn’t write the Ukraine article) have some s***ty opinions on an entirely different topic
The article is by some literal random posted on a blog that posts other insane conspiracy theories. I wish y’all would honestly go argue with QAnon or Stormfront. It would be illuminating for you.
The article is by some literal random posted on a blog that posts other insane conspiracy theories. I wish y’all would honestly go argue with QAnon or Stormfront. It would be illuminating for you.
Yes, a guy who has witnessed and suffered from violence at the hand of Nazis is the real Nazi. You got it man
Yes, a guy who has witnessed and suffered from violence at the hand of Nazis is the real Nazi. You got it man
What???? Wtf are you talking about
What???? Wtf are you talking about
Well if you read the article you’d know what I’m talking about. Just say you support Putin since you hate independent journalism so much
The article is by some literal random posted on a blog that posts other insane conspiracy theories. I wish y’all would honestly go argue with QAnon or Stormfront. It would be illuminating for you.
So what.
The guy was speaking facts throughout the whole article. Guess it wasnt pro ukraine enough for you
So what.
The guy was speaking facts throughout the whole article. Guess it wasnt pro ukraine enough for you
Thank you harbinger of facts.
I only believe what REAL, UNBIASED news outlets like CNN have to say I am very smart
Let’s just go head and censor all independent journalists as a matter of fact, they can’t be trusted anyway. Also someone needs to assassinate Putin, there’s not even freedom of press in Russia!
The thing is he doesn't share news otherwise it would be easy to point to NYT fabrications or whoever he would cite. He's created a litmus test his own sources would not withstand
The thing is he doesn't share news otherwise it would be easy to point to NYT fabrications or whoever he would cite. He's created a litmus test his own sources would not withstand
I don’t think you understand the difference between reading a variety of different sources and diving deeper vs. linking some random that appeases your preconceived biases and saying “omg, guys, read this guys views, they’re great”
Delusion is hard to see within yourself though. Again, go argue with QAnon or Stormfront or X and note how they bring up your exact types of arguments for their “facts”
I don’t think you understand the difference between reading a variety of different sources and diving deeper vs. linking some random that appeases your preconceived biases and saying “omg, guys, read this guys views, they’re great”
Delusion is hard to see within yourself though. Again, go argue with QAnon or Stormfront or X and note how they bring up your exact types of arguments for their “facts”
You have argued against two different articles that you didn't read yet you are the open minded one. I see. You seem really self-aware and intelligent.
Given that I'm vaccinated and boosted and you linked me an article from this publication arguing against that, I appear to meet your criteria. Of course, you didn't read that article either. You are afraid of opposing viewpoints. They will infest you or something. Very weird person.
Incredible write up
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/02/28/the-hypocrisy-of-a-leftist-no-to-war-that-comes-too-late/
the Russian army is trying to inflict casualties only among the military
the Russian army is trying to inflict casualties only among the military
Here's a Pentagon a***yst saying the same thing
“I know it’s hard … to swallow that the carnage and destruction could be much worse than it is,” the DIA a***yst said. “But that’s what the facts show. This suggests to me, at least, that Putin is not intentionally attacking civilians, that perhaps he is mindful that he needs to limit damage in order to leave an out for negotiations.”
newsweek.com/putins-bombers-could-devastate-ukraine-hes-holding-back-heres-why-1690494
Its crazy cause dude is chilling somewhere away from harm while his country gets pummeled