Actions have consequences
yeah but not these particular actions
point me to the consequences of him asking for a no fly zone pls?
it wasnt defending, it was just pointing out how y'all Choose when to freak out and be critical despite both sides doin this s***
ironically, i feel like y'all been makin these claims about how people view the West's atrocities a lot recently instead of actually discussing the present conflicts. and in situations like this when the present conflicts are actually discussed, y'all turn a blind eye just like what has been harped on for 100s of pages itt
it wasnt defending, it was just pointing out how y'all Choose when to freak out and be critical despite both sides doin this s***
Me not debating about Putin bad because we agree =\= me thinking Putin good
yeah but not these particular actions
point me to the consequences of him asking for a no fly zone pls?
for him getting a no fly zone.
Both is f***ed. But when Putin says "if NATO joins, it's nuke o clock", wtf we sposed to think when Z says "could NATO shoot down Russian planes"?
I’m asking again though. If Putin attacks a NATO country, is it then OK to go ahead and annihilate the world with nukes? Or stand by then too? When is the line drawn
guess what?
i agree.
if you thought this was a gotcha u are missing my point
Okay lol
this thread is only 4 people arguing fam
Gundam Wing endless Waltz>
only serious argument
for him getting a no fly zone.
yea but that didn't happen though did it?
i said point me to the consequences of him asking for a no fly zone. That's what u guys are crucifying him for right?
“They will kill not just in the direct vicinity of the impact,” said Mick Mulroy, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and CIA officer. “It will suck the oxygen out of the air and out of the lungs of people nearby. It is horrendous.”
Man this is terrifying
I’m asking again though. If Putin attacks a NATO country, is it then OK to go ahead and annihilate the world with nukes? Or stand by then too? When is the line drawn
Attacking a NATO country is something no one would do unprovoked. That's yo ass. And probably everyone else's too
“They will kill not just in the direct vicinity of the impact,” said Mick Mulroy, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and CIA officer. “It will suck the oxygen out of the air and out of the lungs of people nearby. It is horrendous.”
Man this is terrifying
Vacuum bomb?
Attacking a NATO country is something no one would do unprovoked. That's yo ass. And probably everyone else's too
That doesn’t answer my question.
Is there gonna be a SOTU mega thread in politics or no
Nah this the only thread that matter right now
I’m asking again though. If Putin attacks a NATO country, is it then OK to go ahead and annihilate the world with nukes? Or stand by then too? When is the line drawn
if that happened we still likely wouldn't nuke anybody.
MAD means that launching nukes is basically the same as suicide. and last time i checked, the US does not want to get wiped off the map
Attacking a NATO country is something no one would do unprovoked. That's yo ass. And probably everyone else's too
Damn white people really won
it wasnt defending, it was just pointing out how y'all Choose when to freak out and be critical despite both sides doin this s***
Me not debating about Putin bad because we agree =\= me thinking Putin good
im not talkin bout when Putin = bad
i'm talkin bout how he gave a notion towards nukes just two days ago and a group of ppl here were like "psh never freak out about nuclear conflict that Will Not Happen you are being scared and fearmongering and mindcontrolled by the Western Media"
and then zelensky gives a notion towards, not even nukes, but NATO, which does have nukes, so for fairness i'll grant you that he's giving an inclination towards nukes
and that same group of people has been criticizing and complaining and arguing for hours
meanwhile
Putin is the only one of those two people who actually has the immediate capacity to Do anything regarding nukes