Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Lou

    there’s no research that can be done that suddenly makes something consistent with evolutionary theory. I don’t mean to assert authority but i have a degree in this s***. I’m gonna contact my molecular genetics and my genomics professor and see what they think

    You have a degree in a Biology field and can't surmise that people would be able to reach new conclusions after conducting a research study? One is a rough guess you discussed with Fauci over email where you quite literally state that you had further a***yses to conduct. The other is literally a published article done 2 months later summarizing your work and methodology.

    Did you even read the article they published in Nature?

    Or is this one of those "STEM degree holder thinks he has the secret sauce to answer any and all of life's problems" because

    Not to mention this study only sought to discredit the belief that COVID19 was manufactured, not that it leaked from a lab.

  • Jun 17, 2021
    Lou
    · edited

    I implore everyone to read the NYMag article written by a long-time FOIA researcher. The idea of an accidental lab leak is wholly apolitical and in no way am I propagating anti-China rhetoric. The article was completely vindicated by the contents of Fauci’s leaked emails almost 6 months later

    It’s long, but it’s worth it. Take the time https://nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholson_Baker

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    Like damn, why cant you guys just be normal and shut up until an investigation is done

    Lol why come in a thread like this just wait till you get your opinion from your chosen authority

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Yuzzy

    Lol why come in a thread like this just wait till you get your opinion from your chosen authority

    BROOOOOOOOOOOO, look at the title.

    How the f*** could I have known this was going to be a thread about COVID19

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    On one side we have
    Emails sent to Fauci in January about a research study they are actively conducting on the origins of the SARS-COV2

    On the other side we have
    An entire published study in an academic journal published in March

    KTT2 Poster Conclusion
    The study is a cover up because some of the emails are redacted in an 800+ email dump that spans for over 3 thousand pages

    And these emails were released via a FOIA request? Nice cover up if all it took was a Government order to blow the lid off the NIH and WHO. Both of whom are government entities that conspired to cover up a lab leak for a virus they apparently helped manufacture.

    Why don't you guys just shut up and wait for an actual investigation into the Wuhan lab? Instead of freestyling dumb conspiracies 24/7/365.

    On one side we have:

    The fact that the virus was questioned by scientists to not fit the evolutionary theory and seemed unnatural. The fact that we still have not found the virus in the wild (which we usually do) and have not found the intermediate animal that would have transferred from bats to humans (which we usually do). The fact that the virus outbreak occurred thousands of miles away from the closest known bat colony, but in the same city as a lab that focused on specifically modifying bat coronavirus so that it could more easily infect humans. The fact that multiple employees of this lab were hospitalized in the winter of 2019, just weeks prior to the outbreak.

    On the other side we have:

    A study that says it is natural, published by people being accused of covering this up.

    If you operate under the assumption of somebody’s guilt or innocence, it become very easy to ignore evidence to the contrary (we’re all doing ITT, including me with this post). I can’t say for sure that it leaked from a lab, you can’t say for sure it didn’t. I agree the investigation should pan out, however I agree with Lou that the investigation shouldn’t be handled by people involved in it

    I just feel like there are too many coincidences to the point that it’s difficult to accept them as being purely coincidence.

  • Jun 17, 2021
    KuntaKinte

    BROOOOOOOOOOOO, look at the title.

    How the f*** could I have known this was going to be a thread about COVID19

    lmaoo ur right actually thread title is terrible I forgot I wasn't in covid thread

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    2 replies

    joe rogan is a f***ing moron (his words) so idc about the video in op but yts have made everything about race since the enlightenment era so it’s real ironic that now they want us to stop talking about it

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    oioioioiioiioiio

    Sounds more like he's condemning a region than a race

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    Like damn, why cant you guys just be normal and shut up until an investigation is done

    they think they smarter than scientists that are investigating this s*** daily lmao

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Theory

    On one side we have:

    The fact that the virus was questioned by scientists to not fit the evolutionary theory and seemed unnatural. The fact that we still have not found the virus in the wild (which we usually do) and have not found the intermediate animal that would have transferred from bats to humans (which we usually do). The fact that the virus outbreak occurred thousands of miles away from the closest known bat colony, but in the same city as a lab that focused on specifically modifying bat coronavirus so that it could more easily infect humans. The fact that multiple employees of this lab were hospitalized in the winter of 2019, just weeks prior to the outbreak.

    On the other side we have:

    A study that says it is natural, published by people being accused of covering this up.

    If you operate under the assumption of somebody’s guilt or innocence, it become very easy to ignore evidence to the contrary (we’re all doing ITT, including me with this post). I can’t say for sure that it leaked from a lab, you can’t say for sure it didn’t. I agree the investigation should pan out, however I agree with Lou that the investigation shouldn’t be handled by people involved in it

    I just feel like there are too many coincidences to the point that it’s difficult to accept them as being purely coincidence.

    Are you alluding to the same scientists who were literally just communicating ideas via email and then published an article that states that this is something that can be replicated in nature after conducting more research

    Also can you f*** off. This isn't a lab leak vs nature theory conversation. I'm tired of you weird mother f***ers who are so h**** to argue about this s*** because you spent a summer amassing information to use in your weird facebook groups.

    This guy is alleging some cover up by the government but you're interjecting to make some totally different argument.

    Can you go somewhere? I'm not a virologist, I'm going to wait until an investigation is done before I make any claims.

    Also no s*** the conspiracy theorist who is set deep in his confirmation bias is alluding to them covering up a lab leak theory after they specifically state they need to do more research.

    Also did I ever say the virus didn't leak from a lab?

    I'm not even making any arguments against the lab leak theory.

    All I ever do in these threads is
    1. Make fun of you weirdos who got unshackled from your dungeons and started spamming every damn forum online about how "THE LAB LEAK WAS TRUE THE LAB LEAK WAS TRUE" despite no one ever saying that.
    2. People making these bizarre conspiracy theories either about China trying to nuke people with a bioweapon or the U.S. covering up COVIDs origins.

    You guys aren't clowns, you're the whole f***ing circus.

    I literally opened a thread that I thought would be about racism to see Joe "Killer of Carlos Mencia" Rogan and the crazy dude from TheHill talking about COVID19.
    You guys need literal help.

    Also you don't have evidence of s***.

    You're a bad person for literally f***ing reading an email that ends in "We have to do further a***ysis on the subject, our opinions may change afterwards" and then going "Their opinions changed because they're covering it up"???

    They are literally telling you they haven't finished their f***ing study in the email

    You are genuinely a bad person if you go around treating human beings like this. How the f*** do you accuse someone of conspiracy when you're reading an email where they openly state their opinions are liable to change upon further investigation.

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    edited

    Scientists are certainly not infallible, especially not those doing hugely unethical research. They’re human, if they f*** up massively they’re gonna try to cover their asses. They aren’t, by virtue of being scientists, unable to lie or fabricate papers.

    And that proximal origin paper was written and published far too quickly to be properly peer reviewed. It usually takes months to years

    It was purely political so that the media could run those headlines and Fauci could appear to have to fault in the virus research funding, its creation, and its accidental leak

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    You have a degree in a Biology field and can't surmise that people would be able to reach new conclusions after conducting a research study? One is a rough guess you discussed with Fauci over email where you quite literally state that you had further a***yses to conduct. The other is literally a published article done 2 months later summarizing your work and methodology.

    Did you even read the article they published in Nature?

    Or is this one of those "STEM degree holder thinks he has the secret sauce to answer any and all of life's problems" because

    Not to mention this study only sought to discredit the belief that COVID19 was manufactured, not that it leaked from a lab.

    i actually had a friend who told me this s***

    "science doesn't change man, once its done its done they cant just reevaluate the situation"

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    You have a degree in a Biology field and can't surmise that people would be able to reach new conclusions after conducting a research study? One is a rough guess you discussed with Fauci over email where you quite literally state that you had further a***yses to conduct. The other is literally a published article done 2 months later summarizing your work and methodology.

    Did you even read the article they published in Nature?

    Or is this one of those "STEM degree holder thinks he has the secret sauce to answer any and all of life's problems" because

    Not to mention this study only sought to discredit the belief that COVID19 was manufactured, not that it leaked from a lab.

    bro how have you not caught on. the tides are turning. the CIA have been directed by Biden to investigate its origins and they leaked the info abt the Wuhan employees getting a respiratory illness around the time of the leak. The lab leak hypothesis is increasingly mainstream. What do you think they’re gonna conclude? Who would you trust to say it was artificial?

  • Jun 17, 2021
    orangejuice

    i actually had a friend who told me this s***

    "science doesn't change man, once its done its done they cant just reevaluate the situation"

    A lot of people think this

    and this is how they weaponize scientism today

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    KuntaKinte

    Are you alluding to the same scientists who were literally just communicating ideas via email and then published an article that states that this is something that can be replicated in nature after conducting more research

    Also can you f*** off. This isn't a lab leak vs nature theory conversation. I'm tired of you weird mother f***ers who are so h**** to argue about this s*** because you spent a summer amassing information to use in your weird facebook groups.

    This guy is alleging some cover up by the government but you're interjecting to make some totally different argument.

    Can you go somewhere? I'm not a virologist, I'm going to wait until an investigation is done before I make any claims.

    Also no s*** the conspiracy theorist who is set deep in his confirmation bias is alluding to them covering up a lab leak theory after they specifically state they need to do more research.

    Also did I ever say the virus didn't leak from a lab?

    I'm not even making any arguments against the lab leak theory.

    All I ever do in these threads is
    1. Make fun of you weirdos who got unshackled from your dungeons and started spamming every damn forum online about how "THE LAB LEAK WAS TRUE THE LAB LEAK WAS TRUE" despite no one ever saying that.
    2. People making these bizarre conspiracy theories either about China trying to nuke people with a bioweapon or the U.S. covering up COVIDs origins.

    You guys aren't clowns, you're the whole f***ing circus.

    I literally opened a thread that I thought would be about racism to see Joe "Killer of Carlos Mencia" Rogan and the crazy dude from TheHill talking about COVID19.
    You guys need literal help.

    Also you don't have evidence of s***.

    You're a bad person for literally f***ing reading an email that ends in "We have to do further a***ysis on the subject, our opinions may change afterwards" and then going "Their opinions changed because they're covering it up"???

    They are literally telling you they haven't finished their f***ing study in the email

    You are genuinely a bad person if you go around treating human beings like this. How the f*** do you accuse someone of conspiracy when you're reading an email where they openly state their opinions are liable to change upon further investigation.

    Man you are pressed

    Gonna disregard your tantrum and talk to one of the points you actually made in typing all that s***

    Other scientists have recently discussed the plausibility of it being made/leaking from a lab, hit the google if you’re unaware.

    And you’re saying I’m making an entirely different point, when ultimately the entire conversation boils down to the lab leak vs natural occurrence argument. Here’s why:

    If it was a natural occurrence, then there’s nothing to cover up. But if it truly leaked from the lab, then there was a cover up, because the people involved in the research would know the virus that was f***ing up the world was the same one they just engineered lmao. You kinda can’t argue one without the other. And I’m not claiming who particularly would be involved in the cover up, I’m not saying Fauci (although Lou is saying that), for all I know it could be on a much smaller scale rather than a global conspiracy.

  • Jun 17, 2021
    austin_butler_fan4

    they think they smarter than scientists that are investigating this s*** daily lmao

    These people are down bad. This man is literally spamming an article by a novelist with a bachelors in English.

    I can literally find the National Geographic Science Editor with a PhD in Pathobiology tweeting about how that article is BS

    If I have to weigh some English bachelors article on COVID19 vs some literal Science Editor tweeting, I'm going with the PhD Science Editor.

  • Jun 17, 2021

    not saying that I trust the CIA not to place the blame squarely on China as a justification for anti-China foreign policy; my point is that it’s not at all some “fringe” theory anymore

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    2 replies

    All im saying is when Trump banned travel from China to stop COVID niggas called it racist

    When Biden banned travel from India to stop Covid not only did niggas not call it racist, niggas said "Finally" or "About time"

    Racism is just the end all be all to an argument nowadays. No one has any consistency on whats racist and whats not

  • Jun 17, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Theory

    Man you are pressed

    Gonna disregard your tantrum and talk to one of the points you actually made in typing all that s***

    Other scientists have recently discussed the plausibility of it being made/leaking from a lab, hit the google if you’re unaware.

    And you’re saying I’m making an entirely different point, when ultimately the entire conversation boils down to the lab leak vs natural occurrence argument. Here’s why:

    If it was a natural occurrence, then there’s nothing to cover up. But if it truly leaked from the lab, then there was a cover up, because the people involved in the research would know the virus that was f***ing up the world was the same one they just engineered lmao. You kinda can’t argue one without the other. And I’m not claiming who particularly would be involved in the cover up, I’m not saying Fauci (although Lou is saying that), for all I know it could be on a much smaller scale rather than a global conspiracy.


    Lab Leak =/= Virus manufactured in a lab

    You are quite literally making an entirely different point considering I was arguing with the person who alleged that the NIH, WHO, and the USA were all part of a conspiracy to cover up the lab leak

    Also "If conclusion A is right then surely B must be as well"
    This isn't how logic works at all.

  • Jun 17, 2021
    austin_butler_fan4

    i mean heres another argument... if chinese pppl been eating these s***s for ages, how tf it just started infecting niggas? mad weird idk

  • Jun 17, 2021
    Lou

    The mainstream media only talked about the leaked Fauci emails in which he talks about being weirded out his newfound fame and the ppl loving him.

    Nothing about any foreknowledge or coverup - the media is clearly covering their asses

    This wild tbh

  • Jun 17, 2021
    Lou

    bro how have you not caught on. the tides are turning. the CIA have been directed by Biden to investigate its origins and they leaked the info abt the Wuhan employees getting a respiratory illness around the time of the leak. The lab leak hypothesis is increasingly mainstream. What do you think they’re gonna conclude? Who would you trust to say it was artificial?

    I don't care what is mainstream. This isn't an argument

    The Wuhan employees got a respiratory illness circa November. It could literally just be Influenza.

    Well, if no credible scientist is going to confirm that the COVID19 was a manufactured virus leaked from a lab, the I guess we're just going to wait 200 years until the CIA drops the hammer.

    Cuz there is no way I'm listening to people who watch Joe Rogan or a dude with an English bachelors

  • Jun 17, 2021
    KuntaKinte


    Lab Leak =/= Virus manufactured in a lab

    You are quite literally making an entirely different point considering I was arguing with the person who alleged that the NIH, WHO, and the USA were all part of a conspiracy to cover up the lab leak

    Also "If conclusion A is right then surely B must be as well"
    This isn't how logic works at all.

    I’m not agreeing with everything Lou is saying, you were coming across as being very opposed to the idea of it having come from a lab and I was initially replying to that. Now you seem to be agreeing that it’s plausible, you’re just disagreeing that it had a large scale cover up, and I’m not mad at that.

    In my post I said “being made/leaking from a lab”, I agree it doesn’t have to have been man made to have leaked from the lab.

    Whether it was made in the lab or it leaked from the lab, there would have been a cover up on at least some scale to hide this. It could’ve been a single worker in the lab who covered it up. But I don’t see any plausible way that it leaked from the lab and not a single person from the lab put two and two together. That’s the logic behind the idea that a lab leak would indicate a cover up to some extent. And if there was no lab leak, then there would be no need for a cover up.

    And that’s enough Covid talk today, y’all have fun in here

  • Jun 17, 2021
    KuntaKinte

    BROOOOOOOOOOOO, look at the title.

    How the f*** could I have known this was going to be a thread about COVID19

  • Jun 17, 2021

    CIA expected to report back to the president by late August. Interested to hear what they gotta say

1
...
6
7
8
...
14
Thread was locked by
a moderator