wey 🇵🇭
UncMCMy best avi
I like the thing @Extraterrestrial added to it
- wey 🇵🇭·1 reply
Tuneout
Was it
- Tuneout 🎨·1 replywey
Was it
no ET is defending epstein
- wey 🇵🇭·1 replyTuneout
no ET is defending epstein
Nothing wrong with defending Artie
·3 replies
BruuiiseesKeeping evidence to stop another person from acting on their own free will is blackmail regardless of it it's damning for you as well
That situation is contextually dependent. Mutually assured destruction isn’t what most would consider blackmail.
If I said to you,
Unless you let me give you a billion dollars, I won’t talk you anymore.
Am I blackmailing you into taking a billion dollars from me? Nobody would call that blackmail even if you can make it fit the definition. It’s the context
- Tuneout 🎨wey
Nothing wrong with defending Artie
- Tuneout 🎨Poopfeast420
That situation is contextually dependent. Mutually assured destruction isn’t what most would consider blackmail.
If I said to you,
Unless you let me give you a billion dollars, I won’t talk you anymore.
Am I blackmailing you into taking a billion dollars from me? Nobody would call that blackmail even if you can make it fit the definition. It’s the context
giving a billion dollars isn’t evidence of something
- ·1 replyPoopfeast420
That situation is contextually dependent. Mutually assured destruction isn’t what most would consider blackmail.
If I said to you,
Unless you let me give you a billion dollars, I won’t talk you anymore.
Am I blackmailing you into taking a billion dollars from me? Nobody would call that blackmail even if you can make it fit the definition. It’s the context
No you aren't keeping evidence that would destroy me to make me want to pay you
That would just be a threat
- wey 🇵🇭·1 replyPoopfeast420
That situation is contextually dependent. Mutually assured destruction isn’t what most would consider blackmail.
If I said to you,
Unless you let me give you a billion dollars, I won’t talk you anymore.
Am I blackmailing you into taking a billion dollars from me? Nobody would call that blackmail even if you can make it fit the definition. It’s the context
Why is my husband black mailing people for a billion dollars on ktt2
- Tuneout 🎨wey
Why is my husband black mailing people for a billion dollars on ktt2
- wey 🇵🇭·4 replies
I’m afraid every time ET and broosie argue
ET makes a point
Bruises explains why it’s not a good point
Et tries to steer the conversation to become more general and larger in scale
- wey
I’m afraid every time ET and broosie argue
ET makes a point
Bruises explains why it’s not a good point
Et tries to steer the conversation to become more general and larger in scale
it's late
he's bored and tired
- ·1 replyBruuiisees
No you aren't keeping evidence that would destroy me to make me want to pay you
That would just be a threat
If I said I’ll release your posts to the public (assume this will embarrass you/impact your life) unless you let me give you a billion dollars.
Is that blackmail? Most people wouldn’t call it
blackmail even if you can make it fit a definition. No one would look at that and say “omg he blackmailed her into taking a billion dollars” - ·1 replywey
I’m afraid every time ET and broosie argue
ET makes a point
Bruises explains why it’s not a good point
Et tries to steer the conversation to become more general and larger in scale
There’s no scale. Contextually, a code of silence isn’t blackmail. Whether there’s evidence or not makes zero difference. One person going to the police and confessing is enough. If that’s not
blackmail, then adding evidence to it isn’t either - ·1 reply
When most people accuse Epstein of committing blackmail, they are referring to him getting favors and money in exchange for his silence. Which has never been proven. Having evidence isn’t blackmail.
- UncMC 🪕·1 replyPoopfeast420
When most people accuse Epstein of committing blackmail, they are referring to him getting favors and money in exchange for his silence. Which has never been proven. Having evidence isn’t blackmail.
The only people who say there is no evidence is the doj/fbi the same people who won’t release to the files
- UncMC 🪕
Anyways, here’s some Naruto
- ·1 replyUncMC
The only people who say there is no evidence is the doj/fbi the same people who won’t release to the files
As opposed to who, twitter?
- UncMC 🪕·1 replyPoopfeast420
As opposed to who, twitter?
As opposed to common sense
The man had an advance surveillance system in every property he owned
Something’s you just put two and two together 
·1 replyWhere did the people go?
- UncMC 🪕·1 replyCutiePieHole
Where did the people go?
You lied to me
- ·1 replyUncMC
As opposed to common sense
The man had an advance surveillance system in every property he owned
Something’s you just put two and two togetherCommon sense isn’t common bro. Like I said, every group that holds a belief of any kind, even s*** you would find insane, will have a common sense reason for what they think.
- Tuneout 🎨·1 replyPoopfeast420
Common sense isn’t common bro. Like I said, every group that holds a belief of any kind, even s*** you would find insane, will have a common sense reason for what they think.
so every insane thing is common sense now
- Poopfeast420
If I said I’ll release your posts to the public (assume this will embarrass you/impact your life) unless you let me give you a billion dollars.
Is that blackmail? Most people wouldn’t call it
blackmail even if you can make it fit a definition. No one would look at that and say “omg he blackmailed her into taking a billion dollars”If there was a reason I really didn't want you to give me money then yeah that would be blackmail
