If you threaten to expose them if they exposed you then that would also be considered blackmail yes
Nobody considers a code of silence blackmail. Two people agreeing to not talk about a crime knowing they’ll both go down is not what most people would refer to as blackmail.
no you initially said he never blackmailed people.
which he did.
and now youre saying its semantics because u know that was foolish to say
I said there’s no proof that he blackmailed people. And there’s still no proof 45 minutes later. Could he have? Sure, but there’s no proof so there’s no reason to make up fantasy stories
I said there’s no proof that he blackmailed people. And there’s still no proof 45 minutes later. Could he have? Sure, but there’s no proof so there’s no reason to make up fantasy stories
he literally blackmailed people, according to the literal definition of blackmail. its fact he recorded people doing these things.
done deal
Can't believe et ruined nightshift like this
Better thn trashout spamming cat gif
Nobody considers a code of silence blackmail. Two people agreeing to not talk about a crime knowing they’ll both go down is not what most people would refer to as blackmail.
it was more than an “oath of silence” he was secretly recording the crimes they committed together lol
he literally blackmailed people, according to the literal definition of blackmail. its fact he recorded people doing these things.
done deal
Are you on more d****?
Show me evidence he threatened someone with releasing the recordings
If you have a pact of silence the implied request is "don't tell anyone"
If you keep evidence that would make them want to comply with that request
That's blackmail
Are you on more d****?
Show me evidence he threatened someone with releasing the recordings
doesnt need to have any to be blackmail
ur brain damaged from smoking cigs since u were 12
cursed nightshift hours
Poopfeast420
What i miss
et defends jeff epstein, the NY financier
W
If you have a pact of silence the implied request is "don't tell anyone"
If you keep evidence that would make them want to comply with that request
That's blackmail
If the only implied request is neither party tells anyone, that’s not what most people would call blackmail. It’s mutual compliance.
Wordle 1,893 4/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
id play but i saw someone already do it :(
If the only implied request is neither party tells anyone, that’s not what most people would call blackmail. It’s mutual compliance.
Mutual compliance where one side kept evidence that would damn the other side if they were to betray the compliance is blackmail yeah
I thought I said move on
Mutual compliance where one side kept evidence that would damn the other side if they were to betray the compliance is blackmail yeah
It compels the silence to be kept for both, not just the other party. Again, it’s not what most would consider blackmail.
![]()
![]()
My best avi
It compels the silence to be kept for both, not just the other party. Again, it’s not what most would consider blackmail.
Keeping evidence to stop another person from acting on their own free will is blackmail regardless of it it's damning for you as well
Love u as a vz poster
Don’t be like that
If you have a pact of silence the implied request is "don't tell anyone"
If you keep evidence that would make them want to comply with that request
That's blackmail
Is This about Wesley
Is This about Wesley