durkio calling scratchin white it's on
you said Bush waged a legitimate war in Afghanistan. That disqualifies you as an informed voice on this issue
He did wage a legitimate war. Terrorists attacked us. He sent troops to where they were. The war was legitimate.
If you want to be a white twitter warrior who's incapable of a serious discussion, save it for another thread where you can't respond to arguments and just make posts for likes. This is supposed to be a serious thread. No peasants allowed.
Reagan funded the Mujahideen to fight the commiea and fighters within that group would eventually become what we now know as Taliban, they created a power vacuum and what a surprise it got filled by the people they funded. This reality was known by the US at the time, they accepted it.
The only reason you won't admit this is because you on Reagan's d***, there's really no "serious discussion" to be had with somebody like you. So why would I.
dont the saudi and iran have a proxy war going on in afghanistan? i'd imagine the saudis asked the US for help but idk what situation they'd benefit the most from
Nah you are probably thinking of Syria.
Afghanistan war started with USA and China (which was anti-USSR at the time) giving money to the fundamentalists there in the late 70s
The Afghan government at the time was pro-USSR
Once the fundamentalist situation got out of control they invited the USSR's military to take care of it
The USSR had other problems and retreated in the late 80s
The government existed for another 3 years and collapsed
Then you had a massive civil war between dozens of factions until the Taliban won
The Taliban ruled for 4 years and then the USA had to do something after 9/11
They also wanted a "unsinkable aircraft carrier" bordering Iran
They won the initial invasion but couldn't nation-build for 20 years
The Taliban already had a lot of power but just cemented it definitely now and took over the country without facing any serious opposition whatsoever
Pakistan and the Taliban work together somewhat, China is pragmatic about the Taliban right now, Russia is scared of dealing with Afghanistan again, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are holding back (Afghanistan has a big Uzbek and Tajik population) for now, India supports the (former) Afghan government and so does NATO under the leadership of the USA
Saudi-Arabia doesn't have so much to do with the situation.
Reagan funded the Mujahideen to fight the commiea and fighters within that group would eventually become what we now know as Taliban, they created a power vacuum and what a surprise it got filled by the people they funded. This reality was known by the US at the time, they accepted it.
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1170600468378202118The only reason you won't admit this is because you on Reagan's d***, there's really no "serious discussion" to be had with somebody like you. So why would I.
Irrelevant. Not even addressing common knowledge
And had they not done this, the region would still be run by terrorists because of previous interventions or another nation funding some insurgent group. Saying reagan not doing this = nothing going on in the region today is insanity.
Also Taliban and ISIS are mortal enemies, anybody who claims they are partners doesn't know what they are talking about. Taliban are Deobandi and ISIS are Salafi. Two different groups. There is a tiny patch of land that ISIS controls in Afghanistan and they are surely s***ting their pants right now because Taliban will probably kill their entire leadership there without flinching.
@safe @op or another mod in this section should change title thread to Bush's term Greater Middle East if he talking about specific countries lol
A mod changed the title of my thread. It was supposed to be a thread about middle eastern wars in general
Irrelevant. Not even addressing common knowledge
And had they not done this, the region would still be run by terrorists because of previous interventions or another nation funding some insurgent group. Saying reagan not doing this = nothing going on in the region today is insanity.
He literally explained to you that the "terrorists" only exist there because the USA and China funded them against the USSR
It was never ran by terrorists until the USA did everything they could to make sure of that
Afghanistan was a secular republic in the 80s
CNN is tearing into Biden rn never thought I’d see the day
If there is one thing liberals and conservatives can agree on, it's funding the military-industrial complex
He literally explained to you that the "terrorists" only exist there because the USA and China funded them against the USSR
It was never ran by terrorists until the USA did everything they could to make sure of that
Afghanistan was a secular republic in the 80s
And Im saying that the terrorists would have been there even if Reagan didn't fund them against the USSR.
He literally explained to you that the "terrorists" only exist there because the USA and China funded them against the USSR
It was never ran by terrorists until the USA did everything they could to make sure of that
Afghanistan was a secular republic in the 80s
the 80s foreign policy with China, USSR, and USA is a mess lmao
The terrorists literally wanted to wipe the Soviet influence out. Niggas think they woulda just stopped trying if the U.S. didnt give them weapons
Irrelevant. Not even addressing common knowledge
And had they not done this, the region would still be run by terrorists because of previous interventions or another nation funding some insurgent group. Saying reagan not doing this = nothing going on in the region today is insanity.
I never said there would be "nothing going on", but there definitely wouldn't be no f***ing Taliban in power you idiot
Claiming that the US provoking the USSR to enter Afghanistan and funding the Mujahideen to overthrow the Republic of Afghanistan didn't drastically change that country's history, that's insanity
The terrorists literally wanted to wipe the Soviet influence out. Niggas think they woulda just stopped trying if the U.S. didnt give them weapons
They wouldn't have won without the world's foremost superpower sending them weapons and know-how
And Im saying that the terrorists would have been there even if Reagan didn't fund them against the USSR.
Being there =/= taking over a country
the 80s foreign policy with China, USSR, and USA is a mess lmao
China has always had retärded foreign policy. They supported Pinochet ffs
you think we shouldn't have pulled out
I might not know everything tho so if I'm wrong I'd like to know lol