Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    he 100% should have taken that plea deal I didn't realize what the plea deal was til we were in the case

    I can’t lie I’m niggas too

  • Dec 30, 2022
    iluvmusic123

    no brother. discharge with gross negligence doesnt necessarily mean anyone was injured.
    witness claims they saw him point the weapon - assault
    witness claims they saw him fire the gun - discharge with gross negligence

    Sean Kelly was his witness who said this. He was the defense witness. Why would ANYONE expect the defense witness who they vetted to say "the defense is guilty"

  • Dec 30, 2022
    NeonNigga23

    I can’t lie I’m niggas too

    like 100% there was no way he was getting out of this without getting deported so I don't even understand how a lawyer talked him into this

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    Why niggas just now using the “this site hates nuance” argument?

    F*** that s***, it was mad niggas convinced Tory was completely innocent, calling Meg all types of b****es and w****s and blaming Roc Nation for Tory’s dumbass actions.

    THATS who niggas is clowning bro.

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    Smacked Voodoo

    Yes, the jury came to their verdict based on 40+ pieces of evidence against Tory that was presented in the case.

    The only "mess" there seemed to be was from bloggers putting out misinformation.

    It wasn’t bloggers, there were lawyers present at the trial saying it was very messy

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    SegaDreamFlash

    Why niggas just now using the “this site hates nuance” argument?

    F*** that s***, it was mad niggas convinced Tory was completely innocent, calling Meg all types of b****es and w****s and blaming Roc Nation for Tory’s dumbass actions.

    THATS who niggas is clowning bro.

    none of them niggas is here they either suspended or gone in the wind

  • Dec 30, 2022
    shaleirose

    It wasn’t bloggers, there were lawyers present at the trial saying it was very messy

    lol at this point they gaslighting

  • Abyss

    Tory needs to release a "If I Did It“ type of book, so we can finally know what really went down

    but he did it tho

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    people are really desperate to extrapolate this case into some weird gender war or psychosexual thing. like the people who keep popping up all over social media and being like THIS PROVES HOW MUCH PEOPLE HATE WOMEN are baiting that s*** just as bad as the tory d***eaters

    Bro I’m not even tryna be that guy but go back to when this trial started.

    Niggas was actively being weird and insulting this woman with s*** that had NOTHING to do with this case.

    These niggas throwing stones and hiding their hands

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    It wasn’t bloggers, there were lawyers present at the trial saying it was very messy

    Must not have been as messy as lawyers are saying if the jury was able to come to a unanimous guilty verdict based on 40+ pieces of evidence

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    none of them niggas is here they either suspended or gone in the wind

    So what, after weeks of d***eating these niggas can still get clowned.

    And some niggas is still here but just pretending like they were neutral the whole time lol

  • Dec 30, 2022
    SegaDreamFlash

    So what, after weeks of d***eating these niggas can still get clowned.

    And some niggas is still here but just pretending like they were neutral the whole time lol

    oh yeah I agree. Only thing I don't agree with is "this was cut and dry the entire time"

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Smacked Voodoo

    Must not have been as messy as lawyers are saying if the jury was able to come to a unanimous guilty verdict based on 40+ pieces of evidence

    Yes because jury verdicts are always accurate representations of a case. Zimmerman says hello

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    iluvmusic123

    no brother. discharge with gross negligence doesnt necessarily mean anyone was injured.
    witness claims they saw him point the weapon - assault
    witness claims they saw him fire the gun - discharge with gross negligence

    I am copying directly from California Law

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    SegaDreamFlash

    Bro I’m not even tryna be that guy but go back to when this trial started.

    Niggas was actively being weird and insulting this woman with s*** that had NOTHING to do with this case.

    These niggas throwing stones and hiding their hands

    I’m not saying people aren’t doing that, they obviously are, but there’s been a massive trend separate from that of people either egging it on or being over indulgent in the inverse behavior themselves. Like for sure there are some people who are just being dense or acting like d***s, but not everything is a deeper pathology that requires editorialization

  • Dec 30, 2022
    shaleirose

    Yes because jury verdicts are always accurate representations of a case. Zimmerman says hello

    stop biting the bait

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    4 replies
    krishna bound

    I’m not saying people aren’t doing that, they obviously are, but there’s been a massive trend separate from that of people either egging it on or being over indulgent in the inverse behavior themselves. Like for sure there are some people who are just being dense or acting like d***s, but not everything is a deeper pathology that requires editorialization

    Yea I agree that this case shouldn’t have been a man Vs woman thing but a lot of niggas made it that, especially when her sexual history came out.

    Niggas was deadass tryna use her body count to prove why she didn’t get shot / why niggas ain’t shoot at her.

    What do we call that cuz that s*** was very very strange.

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    I am copying directly from California Law

    Penal Code section 246.3 -
    To be guilty of this offense, you must have intentionally discharged the firearm and done so with gross negligence. Acting with gross negligence means that the conduct exhibited a disregard for human life or the consequences of the act. The offense does not require that there is an actual injury or death, only that the conduct could pose that danger. The tradition of shooting guns in the air on New Years Eve, for example, would be a violation of this law unless the shooting took place in an area where no one else was around.

  • Tubig 🌊
    Dec 30, 2022

    Took one piece out of that list and thought he did something

  • Dec 30, 2022
    SegaDreamFlash

    Yea I agree that this case shouldn’t have been a man Vs woman thing but a lot of niggas made it that, especially when her sexual history came out.

    Niggas was deadass tryna use her body count to prove why she didn’t get shot / why niggas ain’t shoot at her.

    What do we call that cuz that s*** was very very strange.

    Same as those that said "well she lied about sleeping with Tory on Gayle King interview so we can't trust anything she says at all"

  • S*** like that is why imma always clown these corny ass niggas on this site, stand on all the bullshit you was saying when you was so confident or admit that you was bugging.

    But don’t try to gaslight niggas with the “I was always neutral” / “this site hates nuance” s***.

    Y’all really just be Tory stans the way y’all taking pages out old boy book

  • For the trial even started there was niggas still running with the she ain’t even get shot s***, making threads as to why it was fake etc.

    Now we hate nuance

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    SegaDreamFlash

    Yea I agree that this case shouldn’t have been a man Vs woman thing but a lot of niggas made it that, especially when her sexual history came out.

    Niggas was deadass tryna use her body count to prove why she didn’t get shot / why niggas ain’t shoot at her.

    What do we call that cuz that s*** was very very strange.

    The defense only presented that to present Meg as untrustworthy. That’s what happens in these cases, they don’t play fair and try to find literally anything you might’ve done wrong or lied about in the past.

    It’s not a misogynist thing, it was a strategic move by the defense to question Meg’s validity in her claim

  • Dec 30, 2022
    SegaDreamFlash

    Yea I agree that this case shouldn’t have been a man Vs woman thing but a lot of niggas made it that, especially when her sexual history came out.

    Niggas was deadass tryna use her body count to prove why she didn’t get shot / why niggas ain’t shoot at her.

    What do we call that cuz that s*** was very very strange.

    To be fair though this entire case was baiting the editoralization from

    1. Meg saying she originally didn't tell police about the gun because she feared they would kill everyone in the car
    2. Protect Black Woman SNL
    3. Gayle King interview
    4. Bringing up her body count at all
    5. The bullshit of her getting a "black man imprisoned"
    6. Tory dropping like 5 albums about the case in 2 years

    like the rollout of this case was made in a way to create investment and sides. I am not blaming Meg for that because she deserves to speak her truth and Tory team dumb for speaking to blogs and multiple albums

  • Dec 30, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    shaleirose

    The defense only presented that to present Meg as untrustworthy. That’s what happens in these cases, they don’t play fair and try to find literally anything you might’ve done wrong or lied about in the past.

    It’s not a misogynist thing, it was a strategic move by the defense to question Meg’s validity in her claim

    I’m specifically talking about niggas itt brother

Thread was locked by
a moderator