Reply
  • Jul 14, 2021
    BnBallinToo

    Sylvie probably f\*\*\*ed up everything, thats how we'll get the 3 spideys in the same universe, thats how we'll get Xmen, thats how we'll get F4...Its over!!

    Someone itt said this already, but this could also be a reason why the Eternals show up

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Q3D

    I'm thinking we might see a good version of Kang too, also Kang isn't a typical villain at all, sometimes he's a straight up anti hero too, it's gonna be such an interesting new direction for these movies and shows man wow.

    I think we will see many versions

    Having this Kang we saw makes more sense in an Ant-Man movie than having a super serious villain if we’re being honest

  • Jul 14, 2021
    Primate

    Still don't get it. What do you mean by 'this time'? When sylvie killed good Kang it created branches in the timeline right? So is Loki in one of those timelines? If so then is the Kang of that timeline now running s\*\*\* at tva? But then how can that be if there's 1 tva?

    Its all the same timeline and TVA. Somewhere, Kang already did the work to take over the TVA but since the TVA exists outside of time it doesn't matter how long it took Kang to do it. He can change and reorganize the entire thing before Loki even notices since he's now managing the entire timeline. Sylvie simply sent Loki back to the TVA but the question remains what happened to her in the Void since Kang presumably takes that over as well

    my interpretation at least

  • Jul 14, 2021

    Real talk though, who we getting as Iron Lad?

  • Jul 14, 2021

    HOLY F***ING S***

  • Jul 14, 2021

    Maybe that’s why the teaser for Eternals showed basically nothing

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    ziggy

    I think we will see many versions

    Having this Kang we saw makes more sense in an Ant-Man movie than having a super serious villain if we’re being honest

    what if the Kang in Ant Man 3 isn't even the Prime Kang oh god I'm so excited

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    5 replies

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Emery Atreides
    · edited

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

    🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Q3D

    what if the Kang in Ant Man 3 isn't even the Prime Kang oh god I'm so excited

    We will keep seeing Jonathan Majors as Kang for at least 5 years. He’s not leaving after Ant-Man. They’re gonna need the Avengers

  • Jul 14, 2021

    Kang will probably die in each movie and a new version will show up in the next

  • Jul 14, 2021
    Emery Atreides

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Q3D

    🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

    I’m trying to think of where she could be otherwise

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    ziggy

    We will keep seeing Jonathan Majors as Kang for at least 5 years. He’s not leaving after Ant-Man. They’re gonna need the Avengers

    so f\*\*\*ing great man, I was really scared they would waste Kang on a single movie, but they made the right choice

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Sonyomom

    Bro get out fam

    Can’t even lie y’all have mostly been good tho

  • mjpplus

    Can’t even lie y’all have mostly been good tho

    Careful fam. We have been accidentally forgetting tags and getting caught up.

    lol you don’t want this spoiled

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Emery Atreides

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

    damn...... yeah she's the loose end to it all cus she was still in the void that Kang would need to take over. He Who Remains saying killing him meant they couldn't run it makes me think otherwise tho idk. Maybe she could have for a period....

  • Jul 14, 2021
    Emery Atreides

    I’m trying to think of where she could be otherwise

    maybe she's gonna go to war against Kang ans Loki will be caught in the cross fire mmmh

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Emery Atreides

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

    I like this Idea but the statue of Kang looked very human, would this mean that she still has a fake animatronic of a fake Kang? Mobius talked about “HE wants it to branch out”

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Q3D

    so f\*\*\*ing great man, I was really scared they would waste Kang on a single movie, but they made the right choice

    so Loki SZN 1, Ant-Man 3, Loki SZN 2

    That’s a start for this character’s story

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ziggy

    I like this Idea but the statue of Kang looked very human, would this mean that she still has a fake animatronic of a fake Kang? Mobius talked about “HE wants it to branch out”

    okay yeah this is what i wanted to respond to you with when you said we weren't focusing on the last convo enough. Mobius knows about Kang and with the new structure they might have more contact with him than they did with the "time keepers"

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Emery Atreides

    so Loki SZN 1, Ant-Man 3, Loki SZN 2

    That’s a start for this character’s story

    I'm thinking we'll see him in Fantastic Four too, it only makes sense since Reed Richard is a possible ancestor of Kang

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Emery Atreides

    HOLD THE F*** ON

    are we all forgetting that sylvie could actually be in control of this new TVA and using Kang’s name as the lie like the time keepers before?

    She could have been calling Loki out on wanting the throne to take the attention away from the fact that she actually wanted it. Sylvie was gaslighting us all

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    YANDHI

    damn...... yeah she's the loose end to it all cus she was still in the void that Kang would need to take over. He Who Remains saying killing him meant they couldn't run it makes me think otherwise tho idk. Maybe she could have for a period....

    I got a feeling we will see the scary version of Kang arrive at that castle just mere moments after she kills him in the first episode of Season 2\. Like they’ll make it clear she just killed him and then suddenly someone walks in and it’s him again

  • Jul 14, 2021
    ziggy

    I like this Idea but the statue of Kang looked very human, would this mean that she still has a fake animatronic of a fake Kang? Mobius talked about “HE wants it to branch out”

    true, good point and MAYBE my only counter to that theory could be her making an illusion of Kang

    But it could just as easily be what we all originally thought.