Jalen Brunson Fan

1y

It’s over bros

Elric

1y

Rich coming from ms. "bambi was f.o.t.y." disney adult

snowboyrari

1y

walk into a door and lose a tooth

st jpeg

1y

What's the upside of having AI unregulated at a state and federal level for 10 years and what are your "personal reasons" for wanting it to be that way? As Palantir collaborates with our govt to further expand its AI-powered surveillance network, elite-owned news orgs start to sideline writers in favor of generated text and misinformation becomes easier to create and disseminate, what is there to gain by letting these companies do whatever they want, even more so than they already are? The explicit desire to replace of human labor cannot be understated either.

word salad

1y

I’m coming from a tech perspective, so AI writing code, developing tools, streamlining process etc. The general problem is our current ‘AI’ is just statistics on steroids, not actual AGI. So there’s no intelligent design. If you want to ask ChatGPT how do I use a python package to do this thing I want to do to my data, it’s pretty helpful. If you want ChatGPT to write your whole a***ysis pipeline it’s going to give you a bunch basically useless code that you can’t debug, or at best incredibly poorly designed code. Now extrapolate this to all the tech sectors we are going to get a bunch of really inefficient tools that no one understands or knows how to fix when they break

snowboyrari

1y

"huhuhuhuhuh you like disney can't complain about dead arabs or the people who kill them"

oxygen is wasted on a lot of yall

Pusha P

1y

No for sure, but putting limits on it will hinder it's growth.

I'm talking like 5 years from now. That s*** will be insane.

Jalen Brunson Fan

1y

It’s over bros

Elric

1y

Why can't you take a joke

I didn't disagree with your point at all

You know I like Disney too jesus

Pusha P

1y

My bad for going so hard... Fair points about Palantir, they sound horrible. But the alternative is some hyper locked down "but what about the copyright!!!" Type s*** where it won't be useful to anyone because "Sorry, I can't do that.". For example it could create a program for you that does the same as what a commercial product does, but then the commercial company sues you for stealing their idea, or unauthorized use. Even though, technically, the code is all original (no code is original...). Then they sue AI company for enabling it, then they're like "fine, we'll make it so it can't do that." Then it just becomes a stupid glorified chat bot that is actually only used for deception and malice. Also, I think that negative backlash for such an authoritarian move could keep them in check to a degree. I think its potential for good is also equal to it's bad, but in these times, I'm willing to take that risk

Plus, we already know corporations can just buy their privileges regardless.

st jpeg

1y

I think its naive to see good intentions in corporate actions, esp from corps that are currently fighting to deregulate their field. Even more so to think backlash would give a corp pause as many of them are clamoring to be a part of the expanded surveillance state like right now, today.

The tech sector has made it its mission to "disrupt" every industry it can and absorbed every bit of people's data within its grasp to do it. Their for-profit product is a database of works from countless writers, scientists, artists, academics and everyday people; something no singular person or smaller scale entity could pull off. So, not only is it their intent to make money in the industries they've pilfered from, often pitched as an "efficient" alternative, they want the process protected by law. The same law system (copyright) they want altered in their favor. Does selling the ability to mimic a particular author's or journalist's writing, the quirks of a visual creative, the fruits of an academic's research distilled to a digestible form, etc truly necessary to achieve their supposed goal of AGI or is it the easiest way to monetize their scrapping of the net? It sure seems like a majority of the advancement is going into doing all of that instead of something actually helpful. All the while, they accelerate our long-running pollution disaster with their short-term thinking.

Also you never answered what you personally would get out of 10 years of unregulated AI development and expansion.

st jpeg

1y

I think its naive to see good intentions in corporate actions, esp from corps that are currently fighting to deregulate their field. Even more so to think backlash would give a corp pause as many of them are clamoring to be a part of the expanded surveillance state like right now, today.

The tech sector has made it its mission to "disrupt" every industry it can and absorbed every bit of people's data within its grasp to do it. Their for-profit product is a database of works from countless writers, scientists, artists, academics and everyday people; something no singular person or smaller scale entity could pull off. So, not only is it their intent to make money in the industries they've pilfered from, often pitched as an "efficient" alternative, they want the process protected by law. The same law system (copyright) they want altered in their favor. Does selling the ability to mimic a particular author's or journalist's writing, the quirks of a visual creative, the fruits of an academic's research distilled to a digestible form, etc truly necessary to achieve their supposed goal of AGI or is it the easiest way to monetize their scrapping of the net? It sure seems like a majority of the advancement is going into doing all of that instead of something actually helpful. All the while, they accelerate our long-running pollution disaster with their short-term thinking.

Also you never answered what you personally would get out of 10 years of unregulated AI development and expansion.

Lu The Ruler

1y

AI will improve significantly over time.

ChatGPT was s*** initially when it to helping troubleshooting/debugging coding problems. It has pretty much replaced stack over flow/googling for answers at this point. FAANG companies are already using AI to take away entry level developer roles

The end is near

Elric

1y

Only wishing minor injuries on people progress

Pusha P

1y

And the advancement of AI will help all aspects of life, from medicine, to DIY, to new discoveries, is what I personally hope for.

For example, imagine being able to ask it how to do a certain job on your car, and then it shows you pictures of exactly everything you need and will be looking at, and then even generates a step by step video. We're not too far off from that. Then imagine that with like any other industry, from carpentry, to engineering. You don't think car manufacturers aren't gonna go crying to the govt about it being unfair that people can actually help themselves?

I agree that it will soon need to be a force that needs to be contained, but I'd rather it be "free" than the government try to "protect" us by making laws that can be bought out anyway.

Jalen Brunson Fan

1y

It’s over bros

Elric

1y

Why can't you take a joke

I didn't disagree with your point at all

You know I like Disney too jesus

Pusha P

1y

And the advancement of AI will help all aspects of life, from medicine, to DIY, to new discoveries, is what I personally hope for.

For example, imagine being able to ask it how to do a certain job on your car, and then it shows you pictures of exactly everything you need and will be looking at, and then even generates a step by step video. We're not too far off from that. Then imagine that with like any other industry, from carpentry, to engineering. You don't think car manufacturers aren't gonna go crying to the govt about it being unfair that people can actually help themselves?

I agree that it will soon need to be a force that needs to be contained, but I'd rather it be "free" than the government try to "protect" us by making laws that can be bought out anyway.