Drake only started releasing music on YT with CLB I think? he never used to put his music on there except music videos and even music videos he did barely any from like 2014-2018, probably less than 10 (not including fts)
US artists used to avoid releasing on YT because it means they make less money
Not 100% sure but he dropped his previous albums too but only for YouTube Premium members or something
Comparable youtube numbers, Bad Bunny did it in 2 days, Drake in 8 months
https://www.youtube.com/user/DrakeOfficial/videos
https://www.youtube.com/c/BadBunnyPR/videos
Breaking records
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1523346524926668801Clb didnt do this for example
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522885747371655168Second biggest debut
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522962398264668163https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522740268100997124Only been two days, but in a week there would be more numbers to pull up
Bad Bunny being bigger on YouTube doesn't mean he's bigger than Drake globally, when will you get this?
X 100pre was dropped in 2018. This man doing numbers like this with a Spanish only album in America just 4 years into his career is reason enough to start doing Drake number comparisons.
No its not lmao
Dude hasn’t even touched Thank me later numbers multiple albums in
Bad Bunny's dominance is impressive but it's owed a lot in part to Spotify growing a LOT in latin america in recent years, they've gone insane in the last 3~ years with their marketing there. To the point that they've dropped the ball in the US and let Apple Music take over there.
On @thegreatdivine 's point about countries not counting the same, I do think it's stupid how 1 ad stream = 1 premium stream. Same with the price differences. Why should some guy in a poor country of the world paying $3 listening to a Drake song count the same as some dude paying $12? or even worse a person listening on Spotify for free with ads counting the same as 1 paying customer stream.
that's why billboard/riaa weights free streams as 0.3 of a premium one. but Spotify doesn't do that. over the next few years we'll probably see a lot of Latin artists completely dominate these global streaming number stats just because obviously there's a much bigger audience of people
No its not lmao
Dude hasn’t even touched Thank me later numbers multiple albums in
Like Drake wasn't doing 447k the year after he made his mainstream debut lol.
Like Drake wasn't doing 447k the year after he made his mainstream debut lol.
These niggas just can’t avoid trying to bring drake up in these arguments lmao.
Like they don’t know by now to just stop trying to compare every new popping artist to drake
They should try to use j cole as the benchmark or something
Using Drake is the equivalent to saying every new basketball player is the next jordan or lebron
Just setting them up for failure
These niggas just can’t avoid trying to bring drake up in these arguments lmao.
Like they don’t know by now to just stop trying to compare every new popping artist to drake
They should try to use j cole as the benchmark or something
Bad Bunny is a beast on his own but Drake is always the benchmark for success and they're always looking for who they can use to one-up him. It's very weird.
Bad Bunny's dominance is impressive but it's owed a lot in part to Spotify growing a LOT in latin america in recent years, they've gone insane in the last 3~ years with their marketing there. To the point that they've dropped the ball in the US and let Apple Music take over there.
On @thegreatdivine 's point about countries not counting the same, I do think it's stupid how 1 ad stream = 1 premium stream. Same with the price differences. Why should some guy in a poor country of the world paying $3 listening to a Drake song count the same as some dude paying $12? or even worse a person listening on Spotify for free with ads counting the same as 1 paying customer stream.
that's why billboard/riaa weights free streams as 0.3 of a premium one. but Spotify doesn't do that. over the next few years we'll probably see a lot of Latin artists completely dominate these global streaming number stats just because obviously there's a much bigger audience of people
Pretty sure they will start doing promo again for US Spotify once they're done with Latin/Asian countries. I don't even get why so many rap listeners are on AM currently
Bad Bunny being bigger on YouTube doesn't mean he's bigger than Drake globally, when will you get this?
Bro i just cant, y'all are mf obtuse and dont want to see it
All i've been saying is that Drake and Bad Bunny are comparable globally, and the youtube numbers are just one part of it not the whole argument
Pretty sure they will start doing promo again for US Spotify once they're done with Latin/Asian countries. I don't even get why so many rap listeners are on AM currently
They used to pay for a lot of rap exclusives back in the day, for example if i remember right, Compton, Views and Coloring Book were exclusive for some time in AM
They used to pay for a lot of rap exclusives back in the day, for example if i remember right, Compton, Views and Coloring Book were exclusive for some time in AM
Yeah pretty sure Spotify is going to pull similar things in the future
"On @thegreatdivine 's point about countries not counting the same, I do think it's stupid how 1 ad stream = 1 premium stream. Same with the price differences. Why should some guy in a poor country of the world paying $3 listening to a Drake song count the same as some dude paying $12? or even worse a person listening on Spotify for free with ads counting the same as 1 paying customer stream."
Is it really that deep
Y'all are so weird
Why you care. Charts are supposed to be a measure of what's popular and what people are listening to. People in poor countries have so much less disposable income to spend on music. It doesn't mean they shouldn't count or be counted for less?? A $3 in Colombia is way more of the average person's wage there than $12 in US.
But fr was that seriously a way of saying Bad Bunny's streams in Latin America should count for less in Spotify charts than Drake streams in the US?
Y'all are f***ed up. 1. It's not that deep. 2. Do you realise just how much the economic disparity is between these countries? So their streams count for less because of that? Because they're poor? Such a dumb ass long post if that what u was tryna basically say. I mean that's literally what u did say. Got me heated
But fr was that seriously a way of saying Bad Bunny's streams in Latin America should count for less in Spotify charts than Drake streams in the US?
Y'all are f***ed up. 1. It's not that deep. 2. Do you realise just how much the economic disparity is between these countries? So their streams count for less because of that? Because they're poor? Such a dumb ass long post if that what u was tryna basically say. I mean that's literally what u did say. Got me heated
Well I get it that USA charts are the most "important" cause they create the industry, but I remember a lot of users are not from US exactly lol.
@bejewelry
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1523395989016514560Idk why u tagged me cuz i dont care about sales but cool
Well I get it that USA charts are the most "important" cause they create the industry, but I remember a lot of users are not from US exactly lol.
Bro is seriously upset that people in developing countries streams count in Spotify charts the same as US. He deserves a slap for that dumb s***
Bad Bunny's dominance is impressive but it's owed a lot in part to Spotify growing a LOT in latin america in recent years, they've gone insane in the last 3~ years with their marketing there. To the point that they've dropped the ball in the US and let Apple Music take over there.
On @thegreatdivine 's point about countries not counting the same, I do think it's stupid how 1 ad stream = 1 premium stream. Same with the price differences. Why should some guy in a poor country of the world paying $3 listening to a Drake song count the same as some dude paying $12? or even worse a person listening on Spotify for free with ads counting the same as 1 paying customer stream.
that's why billboard/riaa weights free streams as 0.3 of a premium one. but Spotify doesn't do that. over the next few years we'll probably see a lot of Latin artists completely dominate these global streaming number stats just because obviously there's a much bigger audience of people
Wtf? A stream is a stream bro. You rly think it's ok for artists to chart more based on how rich their fanbase is rather than how many people are actually listening?
Horrible take
Comparable youtube numbers, Bad Bunny did it in 2 days, Drake in 8 months
https://www.youtube.com/user/DrakeOfficial/videos
https://www.youtube.com/c/BadBunnyPR/videos
Breaking records
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1523346524926668801Clb didnt do this for example
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522885747371655168Second biggest debut
https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522962398264668163https://twitter.com/chartdata/status/1522740268100997124Only been two days, but in a week there would be more numbers to pull up
Crazy how they didn't acknowledge that second last tweet.
Most Spotify streams in one day ever
Drake stans itt keep bringing up US numbers even though literally nobody has debated Drake being more successful in the US.
The fact that bad bunny could get outsold by Future in the US but is breaking Spotify streaming records shows his global presence
Drake stans itt keep bringing up US numbers even though literally nobody has debated Drake being more successful in the US.
The fact that bad bunny could get outsold by Future in the US but is breaking Spotify streaming records shows his global presence
There’s only about 40-50 million Spanish speakers in the US compared to 300 million English speakers so you gotta multiply Bad Bunny’s numbers by about 6 to be fair
Bad Bunny's dominance is impressive but it's owed a lot in part to Spotify growing a LOT in latin america in recent years, they've gone insane in the last 3~ years with their marketing there. To the point that they've dropped the ball in the US and let Apple Music take over there.
On @thegreatdivine 's point about countries not counting the same, I do think it's stupid how 1 ad stream = 1 premium stream. Same with the price differences. Why should some guy in a poor country of the world paying $3 listening to a Drake song count the same as some dude paying $12? or even worse a person listening on Spotify for free with ads counting the same as 1 paying customer stream.
that's why billboard/riaa weights free streams as 0.3 of a premium one. but Spotify doesn't do that. over the next few years we'll probably see a lot of Latin artists completely dominate these global streaming number stats just because obviously there's a much bigger audience of people
what are you even arguing 💀💀
Only US streams count on bilboard 200 anyway