Reply
  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    huey p rxcan

    meh i guesss idk about photography maybe i should be on bro’s side since jay a millionaire

    Billionaire lol

    Besides his rapping skills you could argue that these iconic images are what helped launched his career. Back then people bought albums off of album art and the aesthetic without knowing what someone sounds like.

  • Jun 16, 2021
    Bandito

    Billionaire lol

    Besides his rapping skills you could argue that these iconic images are what helped launched his career. Back then people bought albums off of album art and the aesthetic without knowing what someone sounds like.

    yes

  • Jun 16, 2021
    Bandito

    Jay Z has a case if he owns the image rights.

    However, I doubt back in 1996 he had any idea on how important it is to own these images. Plus he had no idea how big he would be. If I'm not mistaking Jay Z didn't own the reasonable doubt matters until recently after purchasing them.

    This is a common fight between photographers and a subject. The photographer has barely any rights unless their contract states they can reuse the images.

    However, sometimes the photographer is protected if the contract clearly states they own the images not selected by the client.

    Nah the photo in question is from August 1998, Jay already had a #3 debut with IML Vol. 1 at that point, he was definitely an established artist

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Bandito

    Jay Z has a case if he owns the image rights.

    However, I doubt back in 1996 he had any idea on how important it is to own these images. Plus he had no idea how big he would be. If I'm not mistaking Jay Z didn't own the reasonable doubt matters until recently after purchasing them.

    This is a common fight between photographers and a subject. The photographer has barely any rights unless their contract states they can reuse the images.

    However, sometimes the photographer is protected if the contract clearly states they own the images not selected by the client.

    Talking out of your ass

    Mannion has ownership over his art

    Just like all the other photographs in his catalogue

  • frenchpress

    i hate ppl who arrogantly assume they own the things they make

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    2 replies

    S*** I just realised Jay-Z haven't used his face on album covers since '07

  • Babaláwo

    I’m on Hov’s side. You not about to be selling images of me, or my likeness now that I’m famous and successful without giving me my cut at least.

    Secondly he could be putting be packaging those pictures of Hov in ways he doesn’t like, or agree with.

    then Jay should have played the game he claims to know so well and got that s*** in writing.

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    Kendrik lama

    S*** I just realised Jay-Z haven't used his face on album covers since '07

    wrong

    this was 2017

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Mac Wit Da Cheese

    You so sure of yourself we’ll see how the court rules

    It does state that Hov has “strict control over whether and how his name, likeness, identity and persona are used,” so we’ll see

    Y’all just don’t know how s*** works and it’s easier to say that. First amendment protects all photographers because they took the pic. The only way the person who the pic is of has rights to the pic can own that pic is by buying that pic. It’s law.

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    fiveprestos

    wrong

    this was 2017

    ? this isn’t the cover

  • Coleman

    ? this isn’t the cover

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    fiveprestos

    wrong

    this was 2017

    Hope you're not serious bro.

  • Jun 16, 2021

    That fanart is hard anyway, I will use it.

  • Jun 16, 2021

    Very wack if true

  • Jun 16, 2021
    Mac Wit Da Cheese

    How does he own the rights? He was paid to take the photos not the other way around.

    If he had paid Jay to model in the pics it’d be different

    Copyright belongs to the creator of the artwork.

  • Jun 16, 2021

    If you owe me ten dollars you aint givin me nine

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Kendrik lama

    Hope you're not serious bro.

    the question is are you serious? this is the cover bro.

  • Jun 16, 2021

    Wait, he really tried to make this a race issue to save face

    Take the L and go Hov

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    edited

    He threw in Black teenager. He was 26. B**** ass.

    Let that man get a bag. Hov always been weird about Reasonable Doubt.

  • Jun 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Mac Wit Da Cheese
    · edited

    F*** that, I paid a photographer to take pics of me he doesn’t get to turn around and sell them for profit

    You were paid for a job I wasn’t hired to model

    EDIT: this is my opinion not my ruling so you guys can stop quoting me with legal advice lol

    You’re putting on a fake ignorant act to look cool. Lame

  • Jun 16, 2021
    neu

    This, the photographer is far from an innocent

    He's selling pictures he took for a price he set? What is exactly wrong here

  • Jun 16, 2021

    Sounds very business man like

  • Jun 16, 2021
    fiveprestos

    the question is are you serious? this is the cover bro.

  • Jun 16, 2021
    neu

    This, the photographer is far from an innocent

    How?

  • Jun 16, 2021
    HURRY UP TWO

    It’s giving Eric Adams what OP?

    virtue signaling towards identity politics only to enforce the power dynamic that is in place

1
...
4
5
6
...
8