i wish someone could just tell him he lost this beef because he couldnt just not reply to the millie bobby brown text
he lost the beef when he decided he needed to have 18 year old kylie jenner standing in the back of his video
he lost the beef when he took hailey bieber on a date at 19 when he knew her for 5 years
lucian didnt bot any of this, NFR didnt make any of this up. He made these choices!
if ur talking about recognize kylie was 17 in that vid
If Drake really cared about getting rid of bots, he would’ve addressed an issue like this a long time ago
He only cares now because it’s effecting him
Real s***
Torts
1. Defamation (if proven false):
* Drake could claim that Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify harmed his reputation by artificially boosting Kendrick Lamar’s song to undermine his credibility.
* Key Elements:
* A false statement presented as a fact.
* Publication to a third party.
* Damage to reputation or finances.1. Business Interference:
Allegations of "payola" and bot usage could qualify as tortious interference with prospective economic advantage if UMG and Spotify's actions disrupted Drake’s business opportunities.
Key Elements:
Intentional and improper interference.
Resulting in harm to Drake’s commercial relationships or earnings.
1. Unfair Competition:
UMG's alleged use of deceptive practices (e.g., bots) to promote Lamar's song could be construed as unfair competition.
Key Elements:
Misleading practices impacting fair market competition.
Financial harm to competitors.
Statutory Violations
1. RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act):
* Drake's Claim: UMG violated RICO by engaging in a pattern of fraudulent activity (bots, payola, false advertising) to artificially inflate Lamar's song's popularity.
* Key Elements:
A) Conducting or participating in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
B) Involves two or more acts of racketeering within ten years.
C) Examples of Racketeering Acts: Wire fraud, mail fraud, or money laundering.1. Deceptive Business Practices (New York Law):
A) Allegation: UMG and Spotify engaged in deceptive practices under New York General Business Law § 349. * Key Elements:
B) Acts or practices that are misleading in a material way.
C) Consumer harm or harm to competitors.
1. Payola (Federal Communications Act):
A) Allegations of UMG using payola (undisclosed payments to promote music) would violate the Federal Communications Act.
B) Key Provisions:
C) Payment for music promotion must be disclosed to listeners.
2. False Advertising:
A) If UMG knowingly promoted Lamar’s song with fraudulent metrics or claims, it may violate laws against false advertising.
B) Key Statutes:
C) Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125): Covers false advertising and misrepresentation in commerce.
Legal Remedies
1. Injunction:
A) Drake could seek a court order to prevent UMG and Spotify from continuing the alleged practices.
1. Damages:
A) Compensatory Damages: Lost revenue from alleged artificial inflation.
B) Punitive Damages: To deter UMG/Spotify from future violations.
1. Declaratory Relief:
A) A declaration that UMG’s actions were unlawful.
Drake's legal team would need to prove these violations through evidence of fraudulent activity (e.g., bot logs, financial records of payola schemes, or a***ytics manipulation). The court will examine whether the actions constituted intentional interference or deception and whether they harmed Drake's reputation or earnings.
Are we really gonna say drakes whole 2010 run was bots? Cuz those were a lot of sold out shows I went to live with bots then man idk lmaoo
Do you genuinely in your heart believe songs like Search And Rescue were real hits
Aside from the hypocrisy of drake.
Is the lawsuit alone valid?
No, the evidence they have is some troll akademiks stream and the fact saying” certified lover boy” to Alexa or whatever played NLU, when those lyrics are literally in the song
If Drake really cared about getting rid of bots, he would’ve addressed an issue like this a long time ago
He only cares now because it’s effecting him
Yall love anti industry when it’s plotted by the industry, but when the boy takin out UMG it’s a problem?
The audience's not dumb
If Drake really cared about getting rid of bots, he would’ve addressed an issue like this a long time ago
He only cares now because it’s effecting him
Woulda signed a certain deal
funny how it goes
It’s insane how people see Drake as the victim in this situation. It’s the exact opposite. He’s mad because UMG didn’t pick sides in this battle.
He’s so used to UMG/Spotify shoving his garbage music onto every playlist/shuffle making it impossible to avoid.
He always manipulates/faking the streaming numbers and now that UMG didn’t bow down to him, he’s suing them.
That’s also why he dumped the 100GB of garbage this summer, just to spite UMG. I really hope UMG ends his career.
15 years. He had a good career
it was nice
“Say Drake, I hear you like em young”
“Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles”
Referencing a Drake album followed by the pedo claim makes it very clear who he’s referring to
Can you tell me the line before “Certified Lover Boy? Certified pedophiles”
He don’t care about pedophilia claims just billboard
That’s brain damage
More snow in his brain than mt Fuji
It’s insane how people see Drake as the victim in this situation. It’s the exact opposite. He’s mad because UMG didn’t pick sides in this battle.
He’s so used to UMG/Spotify shoving his garbage music onto every playlist/shuffle making it impossible to avoid.
He always manipulates/faking the streaming numbers and now that UMG didn’t bow down to him, he’s suing them.
That’s also why he dumped the 100GB of garbage this summer, just to spite UMG. I really hope UMG ends his career.
Bro lol
If Drake really cared about getting rid of bots, he would’ve addressed an issue like this a long time ago
He only cares now because it’s effecting him
That’s the thing.
It’s not that this sort of thing happening is unbelievable.
It’s the song and person drake is deciding to instigate legal action over. Aubrey’s angels pretending like they don’t understand that have brain rot.