Gosh 😹Mar 21, 2025
NixSo, major labels stay out of rap beef. That's a win.
Drake fans think no more mainstream rap beefs is a win because Drake hasn’t won one in 10 years
- Mar 21, 2025·1 replyNix
So, major labels stay out of rap beef. That's a win.
Except it could very well impact music outside of “rap beef” as stated before, even if it didn’t why would giving major labels more power on what lyric gets to stay and what gets omitted being a positive thing?
- Mar 21, 2025·2 repliesmmonay
Read through some of the previous posted tweets and we should be a bit nervous on how this plays out.
There could be some really serious consequences including censorship to the genre as a whole.
It’s pretty easy to see how major labels might not want to take a chance with something like this moving forward, scariest part is that it may not just be from a “rap beef” lens.
oh no how will the labels survives if they cant profit of someone being labeled a certified pdfile on the biggest song of the year
oh no poor labels
its almost like this never has happened before, but UMGs greed and relationships got the best of them. They really are trying to sell it to the masses as something completely normal.
- Mar 21, 2025·edited·1 replymmonay
Except it could very well impact music outside of “rap beef” as stated before, even if it didn’t why would giving major labels more power on what lyric gets to stay and what gets omitted being a positive thing?
Because that would only affect music that's officially released on DSPs
Mar 21, 2025·1 replythekid187oh no how will the labels survives if they cant profit of someone being labeled a certified pdfile on the biggest song of the year
oh no poor labels
its almost like this never has happened before, but UMGs greed and relationships got the best of them. They really are trying to sell it to the masses as something completely normal.
So you’re admitting this song destroyed Drake?
- Mar 21, 2025
Drake fans keep repeating this “oh so you’re supporting the big labels!?” S***
Drake is literally suing them because they weren’t controlling enough. Like what about this is hard to understand
- Mar 21, 2025·1 replynotbrock
So you’re admitting this song destroyed Drake?
something can only be damaging if it straight up destroys you ?
so multiple attempts are fine as long as the bullet doesnt connect with your head? if thats your argument thats weak.
- Mar 21, 2025·2 repliesNix
Because that would only affect music that's officially released on DSPs
Not every artist is drake, a lot of artists sign to a label just so they can get their music into the public eye, would be awesome if it wasn’t the case but that’s just how the industry is built currently.
Explain why it would be a positive thing for these artists to have to face censorship when releasing their music?
- Mar 21, 2025thekid187
oh no how will the labels survives if they cant profit of someone being labeled a certified pdfile on the biggest song of the year
oh no poor labels
its almost like this never has happened before, but UMGs greed and relationships got the best of them. They really are trying to sell it to the masses as something completely normal.
The interesting thing is I’m actually taking a more anti label stance then you are, labels are gonna profit way too much on the music artists release.. we know that.
But why would we ever want to risk censorship on tracks their artists release just because it could be considered a possible risk for a lawsuit?
- Mar 21, 2025thekid187
something can only be damaging if it straight up destroys you ?
so multiple attempts are fine as long as the bullet doesnt connect with your head? if thats your argument thats weak.
It did enough damage worthy of a lawsuit?
Mar 21, 2025·2 repliesmmonayNot every artist is drake, a lot of artists sign to a label just so they can get their music into the public eye, would be awesome if it wasn’t the case but that’s just how the industry is built currently.
Explain why it would be a positive thing for these artists to have to face censorship when releasing their music?
These Drake Stans want to add another step in the approval process for releasing music. That means we gotta wait longer for music. They’re idiots
- Mar 21, 2025Lmfao
These Drake Stans want to add another step in the approval process for releasing music. That means we gotta wait longer for music. They’re idiots
I think they are hyper fixated on the Kendrick drake beef and aren’t really seeing the whole picture.
Unless they are pro censorship, which is fine but don’t pretend it’s a pro artist stance to have.
Mar 21, 2025·6 repliesImagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
Mar 21, 2025Zack From The SixImagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
You’re confusing people being Anti-Drake with being Pro-UMG
- Mar 21, 2025Zack From The Six
Imagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
Using buzzwords because it’s easy to shape it as drake vs industry smh
Mar 21, 2025LmfaoThese Drake Stans want to add another step in the approval process for releasing music. That means we gotta wait longer for music. They’re idiots
drakes going full MAGA
- Mar 21, 2025Zack From The Six
Imagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
Facts
- Mar 21, 2025·1 replyZack From The Six
Imagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
More like imagine the biggest label has to defend artists right to free speech against a rapper
Mar 21, 2025Zack From The SixImagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
rapper?
- Mar 21, 2025·2 repliesFree YoungBoy
More like imagine the biggest label has to defend artists right to free speech against a rapper
Defamation is not protected under free speech
- Mar 21, 2025Zack From The Six
Defamation is not protected under free speech
Good thing this isn’t defamation
Mar 21, 2025·1 replyZack From The SixImagine if you told hip hop fans 15 years ago that so-called hip hop heads would side with the biggest music label against a rapper
Game's gone man
Kier Starmer could use someone this good at political spin
- Mar 21, 2025·1 replyZack From The Six
Defamation is not protected under free speech
I think it’s fair to say this however if you actually believe this, it applies for both artists, there’s no way to say one artist did and the other didn’t without showing bias.
- Mar 21, 2025·2 repliesmmonay
I think it’s fair to say this however if you actually believe this, it applies for both artists, there’s no way to say one artist did and the other didn’t without showing bias.
I've always been against both claims
- Mar 21, 2025·1 replyJohn Mauve
Kier Starmer could use someone this good at political spin
He needs a lot of things and the one he needs the most is to go