Mar 17, 2025
thegreatdivineIf that's the case, why not let the case go to trial so Drake can also lose there?
that’s a case that could last multiple years, no one is trying to invest those resources from either side lmfao
i have a simple driving charge and my lawyer been getting court pushed back 3 times from 2023 to late 2025 so he can gather evidence for the case to be dropped without trial
- Mar 17, 2025·1 reply
CRACKASTEPPAVEGANDo they really think the judge will be like "Yeah, should've just taken your L bruh."
It's the court of law, and these niggas are moving like it's Jerry Springer
Idk they kinda cooking here
Mar 17, 2025thegreatdivineMan, shut up.
One second, you’re saying you’re done giving your opinion and the next you’re still asking questions.
If you have a genuine interest in how defamation arguments work, I’ll share. It’ll probably help you understand if Drake can move to trial.
But stay consistent love
Mar 17, 2025You gotta love them ktt armchair lawyers
- Mar 17, 2025·1 replyValentine
she tryna get back to real cases not millionaire vs billionaire money battles
We went from, "Did the diss miss the mark?" To "Will she dismiss the case?"
- Mar 17, 2025·1 replythegreatdivine
This is where they set themselves up. The very idea that Not Like Us isn't defamatory, is false. A better case would have been them suggesting that Drake also made defamatory remarks aimed at Kendrick lmao.
They did
- Mar 17, 2025Valentine
man UMG gonna post the video as evidence that Dot was misled by the accusers actions???
- Mar 17, 2025CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN
We went from, "Did the diss miss the mark?" To "Will she dismiss the case?"
Mar 17, 2025thegreatdivineThey never had a solid defense against this s*** because they never imagined Drake would actually sue. That's why the only thing that can do is lazily double down with "he's just mad he lost a rap battle and that's why he's suing us." Definitely a choice when Drake's lawsuit fired off a myriad of other reasons why he's suing lol.
My guess is that the judge rules on it going to trial, if only to see what else Drake's side comes up with to make their case but we'll see.
he is just mad he lost a rap battle and that's why he's suing UMG
- Mar 17, 2025AZNoah
Again, you’re focusing on language that isn’t essential to the legal argument UMG presents to the court.
It’s ok to say you don’t understand the law of defamation. Your focus on red herrings is showing that.
red herring
talk that talk king 🗣️
- Mar 17, 2025
them red herrings only work on a jury
Mar 17, 2025·3 replies
RangerFan9903“Heard that one of them lil kids MIGHT BE Dave frees”
Not the same at all, UMG has public defenders
Right? Drake's lines on Dave Free were actually hyperbolic.
- Mar 17, 2025·1 replyWT777
Idk they kinda cooking here
Would that public petition he signed back then put his case in a bind
- Gosh 😹Mar 17, 2025
PAINMANUMG cooked him but you won’t hear it itt
Literally laughed in his face
- Mar 17, 2025AZNoah
Again, you’re focusing on language that isn’t essential to the legal argument UMG presents to the court.
It’s ok to say you don’t understand the law of defamation. Your focus on red herrings is showing that.
Better Call Noah
- Mar 17, 2025·1 replyAZNoah
Again, you’re focusing on language that isn’t essential to the legal argument UMG presents to the court.
It’s ok to say you don’t understand the law of defamation. Your focus on red herrings is showing that.
Are you a lawyer
- Mar 17, 2025
- Mar 17, 2025·edited·1 replyNix
Right? Drake's lines on Dave Free were actually hyperbolic.
it always getting spun as a defense of UMG is disingenuous
it is an a***ysis of the case not having good legs to stand on based on similar actions by the accused that triggered the entire situation after being warned to stop he continued to prod
good for Drake for standing up for himself AFTER accepting dropping diss songs with heinous rumors, accepting a $400M check from UMG and $100M check from a gambling website, but let’s not keep acting like he wasn’t “the CEO of universal” just less than 12 months ago lol
Mar 17, 2025WT777They did
- Gosh 😹Mar 17, 2025
Drake losing is pointless anyways because the angels will just say “at least The Boy TRIED to take on the system what a martyr”
- Mar 17, 2025·4 repliesValentine· edited
it always getting spun as a defense of UMG is disingenuous
it is an a***ysis of the case not having good legs to stand on based on similar actions by the accused that triggered the entire situation after being warned to stop he continued to prod
good for Drake for standing up for himself AFTER accepting dropping diss songs with heinous rumors, accepting a $400M check from UMG and $100M check from a gambling website, but let’s not keep acting like he wasn’t “the CEO of universal” just less than 12 months ago lol
Remember when Drake fans were telling us about how Drake owns the masters for every artist on UMG
Mar 17, 2025https://twitter.com/meghanncuniff/status/1901653573114671136AZNoahThat unbothered line is SPICY, my goodness
- Mar 17, 2025LickMyBalls
Remember when Drake fans were telling us about how Drake owns the masters for every artist on UMG
even Drake believed it himself
and dropped an entire diss song over it
but word lmfao. now he a martyr - Mar 17, 2025CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN
Would that public petition he signed back then put his case in a bind
it’ll likely be given some weight in the argument that lyrics cannot be taken as factual as UMG is arguing that it’s up to a reasonable listener’s opinion.
However, Drake’s petition was in support of lyrics being used as fact in a criminal context, which isn’t relevant to defamation.
- Mar 17, 2025·1 replyLickMyBalls
Remember when Drake fans were telling us about how Drake owns the masters for every artist on UMG
You literally just made this up lmao.
