YANDHI

2y

She’s a major part of the problem and this elder abuse. She encourages it

Just look at the event they did right after where she’s telling him he answered every question well like he’s a toddler

SIGH

2y

Weird thing is Bill Clinton is younger than Trump and Biden

Himothee

2y

Trump went on stage last night and called Biden a Palestinian for pushing for a ceasefire and not letting Israel go all the way.

Trump will either do worse or be equal to Biden. They’re both s***, but acting like Trump would be better is nuts.

Undecided

2y

So is Bush

Choking

2y

i understand Biden there are just concepts u can’t express through words or u look like ur speaking gibberish when ur just on another wave length

allmygirlsdoyoga

2y

I can’t believe they think this is a good idea

WT777

2y

It's pretty crazy how ppl suddenly acting shocked about biden being a senile fossil that may not be fit to run

Just a few days ago his press secretary literally said the clips of him spacing out at juneteenth was ai deep fakes 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

allmygirlsdoyoga

2y

I can’t believe they think this is a good idea

allmygirlsdoyoga

2y

I can’t believe they think this is a good idea

allmygirlsdoyoga

2y

I can’t believe they think this is a good idea

SignedTwice

2y

Trump winning in a landslide lmao

MrMudManMood

2y

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. The decision will likely have far-reaching effects across the country, from environmental regulation to healthcare costs.

By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. But in a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.”

SignedTwice

2y

Trump winning in a landslide lmao

Rockstard

2y

At the end of the day, when you ignore the international online trolls, what voter's mind was changed by this?

MrMudManMood

2y

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. The decision will likely have far-reaching effects across the country, from environmental regulation to healthcare costs.

By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. But in a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.”

Gangy

2y

the swing voters maybe tbh, which is absolutely not nothing

allmygirlsdoyoga

2y

I can’t believe they think this is a good idea

K DOG 99

2y

Landslide is still a over exaggeration imo because I don't think any bright blue states will be impacted, you are gonna lose the swing states potentially, but this ain't gonna be Nixon 1972 or Reagan 1984

Gangy

2y

Well yeah I don’t agree with landslide but this performance flop matters